On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:50:20PM +0100, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:29:11AM +0100, Javi Merino wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:33:40PM +0100, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > The code in question is called outside of standard driver > > > probe()/remove() callbacks and thus will not benefit from use of devm* > > > infrastructure. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> > > > > We added the devm* calls because Eduardo asked for them in the review. > > I don't have a strong opinion regarding this, I'll leave the decision > > to Eduardo. > > I tried to look for his reasons, if any, but even in earliest posted > versions use devm* for allocating memory
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/45000/focus=45265 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/46064/focus=1722858 He didn't give reasons and I didn't ask for them. He insisted on it so I just added it across the board. Cheers, Javi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
