On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 17:12 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 05-08-15 14:49:28, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > 3.19.8-ckt5 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let 
> > me know.
> 
> The patch was later reverted so please don't push it to stable.
> 
>                                                               Honza


Thanks very much Jan.  Dropped from 3.19-stable.

 -Kamal


> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> > 
> > commit a2673b6e040663bf16a552f8619e6bde9f4b9acf upstream.
> > 
> > fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can race with
> > fsnotify_destroy_marks() so when fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() drops
> > mark_mutex, a mark from the list iterated by
> > fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can be freed and we dereference free
> > memory in the loop there.
> > 
> > Fix the problem by keeping mark_mutex held in
> > fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked().  The reason why we drop that mutex is that
> > we need to call a ->freeing_mark() callback which may acquire mark_mutex
> > again.  To avoid this and similar lock inversion issues, we move the call
> > to ->freeing_mark() callback to the kthread destroying the mark.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> > Reported-by: Ashish Sangwan <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Lino Sanfilippo <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  fs/notify/mark.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/notify/mark.c b/fs/notify/mark.c
> > index 92e48c7..3e594ce4 100644
> > --- a/fs/notify/mark.c
> > +++ b/fs/notify/mark.c
> > @@ -152,31 +152,15 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked(struct 
> > fsnotify_mark *mark,
> >             BUG();
> >  
> >     list_del_init(&mark->g_list);
> > -
> >     spin_unlock(&mark->lock);
> >  
> >     if (inode && (mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_OBJECT_PINNED))
> >             iput(inode);
> > -   /* release lock temporarily */
> > -   mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
> >  
> >     spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
> >     list_add(&mark->g_list, &destroy_list);
> >     spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
> >     wake_up(&destroy_waitq);
> > -   /*
> > -    * We don't necessarily have a ref on mark from caller so the above 
> > destroy
> > -    * may have actually freed it, unless this group provides a 
> > 'freeing_mark'
> > -    * function which must be holding a reference.
> > -    */
> > -
> > -   /*
> > -    * Some groups like to know that marks are being freed.  This is a
> > -    * callback to the group function to let it know that this mark
> > -    * is being freed.
> > -    */
> > -   if (group->ops->freeing_mark)
> > -           group->ops->freeing_mark(mark, group);
> >  
> >     /*
> >      * __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags(inode);
> > @@ -191,8 +175,6 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked(struct fsnotify_mark 
> > *mark,
> >      */
> >  
> >     atomic_dec(&group->num_marks);
> > -
> > -   mutex_lock_nested(&group->mark_mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void fsnotify_destroy_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
> > @@ -205,7 +187,10 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Destroy all marks in the given list. The marks must be already detached 
> > from
> > - * the original inode / vfsmount.
> > + * the original inode / vfsmount. Note that we can race with
> > + * fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags(). However we hold a reference to 
> > each
> > + * mark so they won't get freed from under us and nobody else touches our
> > + * free_list list_head.
> >   */
> >  void fsnotify_destroy_marks(struct list_head *to_free)
> >  {
> > @@ -406,7 +391,7 @@ struct fsnotify_mark *fsnotify_find_mark(struct 
> > hlist_head *head,
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > - * clear any marks in a group in which mark->flags & flags is true
> > + * Clear any marks in a group in which mark->flags & flags is true.
> >   */
> >  void fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> >                                      unsigned int flags)
> > @@ -460,6 +445,7 @@ static int fsnotify_mark_destroy(void *ignored)
> >  {
> >     struct fsnotify_mark *mark, *next;
> >     struct list_head private_destroy_list;
> > +   struct fsnotify_group *group;
> >  
> >     for (;;) {
> >             spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
> > @@ -471,6 +457,14 @@ static int fsnotify_mark_destroy(void *ignored)
> >  
> >             list_for_each_entry_safe(mark, next, &private_destroy_list, 
> > g_list) {
> >                     list_del_init(&mark->g_list);
> > +                   group = mark->group;
> > +                   /*
> > +                    * Some groups like to know that marks are being freed.
> > +                    * This is a callback to the group function to let it
> > +                    * know that this mark is being freed.
> > +                    */
> > +                   if (group && group->ops->freeing_mark)
> > +                           group->ops->freeing_mark(mark, group);
> >                     fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
> >             }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to