On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 19:56 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Obviously in the current place the 'else' keyword is redundant, 
> though it seems
> quite correct when we check if nval is in allowed range.
> 
> Reattach the condition branch there.

Rafael, it would be nice to have these fixes in 4.3 as well if you have
no objections.

One comment below.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/property.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> index 7836e2e..a28752c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> @@ -528,13 +528,14 @@ int acpi_dev_prop_read(struct acpi_device 
> *adev, const char *propname,
>  
>       if (!val)
>               return obj->package.count;
> -     else if (nval <= 0)
> -             return -EINVAL;
>  
>       if (nval > obj->package.count)
>               return -EOVERFLOW;
> +     else if (nval <= 0)
> +             return -EINVAL;
>  
>       items = obj->package.elements;
> +

This…

>       switch (proptype) {
>       case DEV_PROP_U8:
>               ret = acpi_copy_property_array_u8(items, (u8 *)val, 
> nval);
> @@ -552,8 +553,7 @@ int acpi_dev_prop_read(struct acpi_device *adev, 
> const char *propname,
>               ret = acpi_copy_property_array_string(items, (char 
> **)val, nval);
>               break;
>       default:
> -             ret = -EINVAL;
> -             break;
> +             return -EINVAL;

…and this seem left overs. If you wish I can resend this patch without
them.

>       }
>       return ret;
>  }

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to