Add a semantic patch for fixing some cases of checkpatch.pl error:
ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
Signed-off-by: Kris Borer <kbo...@gmail.com>
---
scripts/coccinelle/style/assignment_in_if.cocci | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 scripts/coccinelle/style/assignment_in_if.cocci
diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/style/assignment_in_if.cocci
b/scripts/coccinelle/style/assignment_in_if.cocci
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d9895e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/style/assignment_in_if.cocci
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+// find checkpatch.pl errors of the type:
+// ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
+//
+// Confidence: Moderate
+
+
+// if ( ret = call() )
+@if1@
+identifier i;
+expression E;
+statement S1, S2;
+@@
+
++ i = E;
+ if (
+- (i = E)
++ i
+ ) S1 else S2
+
+
+// if ( (ret = call()) < 0 )
+@if2@
+identifier i;
+expression E;
+statement S1, S2;
+binary operator b;
+@@
+
++ i = E;
+ if (
+- (i = E)
++ i
+ b ... ) S1 else S2
+
+// if ( ptr->fun && (ret = ptr->fun()) < 0 )
+@if3@
+identifier i, i2;
+expression E1, E2;
+constant c;
+binary operator b;
+@@
+
++ if( E1->i ) {
++ i2 = E2;
++ if (i2 < c) {
+- if( E1->i && ((i2 = E2) b c) ) {
+ ...
+- }
++ }
++ }
+
+// if ( (ret = call()) < 0 && ret != 0 )
+@if4@
+identifier i;
+expression E, E2, E3;
+statement S1, S2;
+binary operator b;
+@@
+
++ i = E;
+ if (
+- (i = E)
++ i
+ b
+ ... && E2 && E3 ) S1 else S2
+
+// if ( (ret = call()) < 0 && ret != 0 && ret != 0 )
+@if5@
+identifier i;
+expression E, E2, E3;
+statement S1, S2;
+binary operator b;
+@@
+
++ i = E;
+ if (
+- (i = E)
++ i
+ b
+ ... && E2 && E3 ) S1 else S2
+
+
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
