The smp_operations structure is not over-written, so add const
qualifier and replace __initdata with __initconst.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
---

 arch/arm/mach-qcom/platsmp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-qcom/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-qcom/platsmp.c
index 5cde63a..11847cd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-qcom/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-qcom/platsmp.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void __init qcom_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int 
max_cpus)
        }
 }
 
-static struct smp_operations smp_msm8660_ops __initdata = {
+static const struct smp_operations smp_msm8660_ops __initconst = {
        .smp_prepare_cpus       = qcom_smp_prepare_cpus,
        .smp_secondary_init     = qcom_secondary_init,
        .smp_boot_secondary     = msm8660_boot_secondary,
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static struct smp_operations smp_msm8660_ops __initdata = {
 };
 CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(qcom_smp, "qcom,gcc-msm8660", &smp_msm8660_ops);
 
-static struct smp_operations qcom_smp_kpssv1_ops __initdata = {
+static const struct smp_operations qcom_smp_kpssv1_ops __initconst = {
        .smp_prepare_cpus       = qcom_smp_prepare_cpus,
        .smp_secondary_init     = qcom_secondary_init,
        .smp_boot_secondary     = kpssv1_boot_secondary,
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static struct smp_operations qcom_smp_kpssv1_ops __initdata 
= {
 };
 CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(qcom_smp_kpssv1, "qcom,kpss-acc-v1", 
&qcom_smp_kpssv1_ops);
 
-static struct smp_operations qcom_smp_kpssv2_ops __initdata = {
+static const struct smp_operations qcom_smp_kpssv2_ops __initconst = {
        .smp_prepare_cpus       = qcom_smp_prepare_cpus,
        .smp_secondary_init     = qcom_secondary_init,
        .smp_boot_secondary     = kpssv2_boot_secondary,
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to