Hi Mark,

On 08/19/2015 09:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:23:54AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> On Friday 14 August 2015 11:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:54:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>
>>>> is moved as a child node of syscon, vsel_reg and enable_reg has the
>>>> absolute address because of the address translation that happens while
>>>> creating device from device tree node.
>>>> So avoid using platform_get_resource and use of_get_address in order to
>>>> get only the offset (untranslated address) and populate these in
>>>> vsel_reg and enable_reg.
>
>>> This sounds like we're going in the wrong direction, we're moving from a
>>> more generic API to a firmware specific one.  Why is this a good fix?
>
>> platform_get_resource can be used if we need the absolute address but here we
>> need only the offset.
>
> So substract this address from the start of the resource to get the
> offset?  Or provide a wrapper function in the resource code which does
> that.  

I'd be very appreciated if you have and can share any thought on
How can we get this absolute base address to substract?

Below is what we have in DT:

        l4_cfg: l4@4a000000 {
                        compatible = "ti,dra7-l4-cfg", "simple-bus";
                        #address-cells = <1>;
                        #size-cells = <1>;
                        ranges = <0 0x4a000000 0x22c000>;

        [GS] <=== 0x4a000000 is our top level l4 base address

                        scm: scm@2000 {
                                compatible = "ti,dra7-scm-core", "simple-bus";
                                reg = <0x2000 0x2000>;
                                #address-cells = <1>;
                                #size-cells = <1>;
                                ranges = <0 0x2000 0x2000>;

        [GS] <=== 0x4a002000 is our scm-core base address
        IORESOURCE_MEM: 0x4a002000 : 4A003FFF

                                scm_conf: scm_conf@0 {
                                        compatible = "syscon", "simple-bus";
                                        reg = <0x0 0x1400>;
                                        #address-cells = <1>;
                                        #size-cells = <1>;

        [GS] <=== 0x4a002000 is our syscon base address
        IORESOURCE_MEM: 0x4a002000 : 4A0033FF

                                        pbias_regulator: pbias_regulator {
                                                compatible = "ti,pbias-omap";
                                                reg = <0xe00 0x4>;

        [GS] <=== 0x4a002E00 is our pbias base address
        IORESOURCE_MEM: 0x4a002E00 : 4A002E03
        Here we should use reg_offset=0xE00 as input parameter for regmap APIs.

                                                syscon = <&scm_conf>;
                                                pbias_mmc_reg: pbias_mmc_omap5 {
                                                        regulator-name = 
"pbias_mmc_omap5";
                                                        regulator-min-microvolt 
= <1800000>;
                                                        regulator-max-microvolt 
= <3000000>;
                                                };
                                        };

                                        scm_conf_clocks: clocks {
                                                #address-cells = <1>;
                                                #size-cells = <0>;
                                        };
                                };

As I understood, all of_address APIs/code is designed to parse/translate
addresses in top-bottom direction, and it looks nontrivial to get any kind
of base addresses from driver's side (except of its own address), because
it will require reverse DT parsing in bottom-top direction.
Maybe I missed smth?

-- 
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to