I've noticed that fixed_phy_register() ignores its 'irq' parameter instead of
passing it to fixed_phy_add(). Luckily, fixed_phy_register() seems to always
be called with PHY_POLL for 'irq'... :-)
Fixes: a75951217472 ("net: phy: extend fixed driver with fixed_phy_register()")
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com>
---
The patch is against DaveM's 'net.git' repo.
drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: net/drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c
===================================================================
--- net.orig/drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c
+++ net/drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ struct phy_device *fixed_phy_register(un
phy_addr = phy_fixed_addr++;
spin_unlock(&phy_fixed_addr_lock);
- ret = fixed_phy_add(PHY_POLL, phy_addr, status, link_gpio);
+ ret = fixed_phy_add(irq, phy_addr, status, link_gpio);
if (ret < 0)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
