On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Paul Gortmaker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Jiang Liu <[email protected]> > >> > >> Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we > >> already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc. > > > > Hi Linus, > > > > It seems that linux-next has this copy of the patch as 5663bb27dec1, which > > has a stray irq_desc_get_irq_chip in s3c24xx ; (2nd instance of "irq" is > > bogus looking.) I first assumed it was from tglx since it did not have any > > additional SOB lines, but on further investigation I traced it back to sfr's > > merge of pinctrl/for-next. > > Hm, saw this a bit late I guess. > > Torvalds has merged my trees, is there a problem in mainline > that need to be addressed or did this fix itself?
No, it's buggered in Linus tree as well. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
