On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Paul Gortmaker
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> 
>> > wrote:
>> >> From: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >> Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we
>> >> already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc.
>> >
>> > Hi Linus,
>> >
>> > It seems that linux-next has this copy of the patch as 5663bb27dec1, which
>> > has a stray irq_desc_get_irq_chip in s3c24xx ; (2nd instance of "irq" is
>> > bogus looking.)   I first assumed it was from tglx since it did not have 
>> > any
>> > additional SOB lines, but on further investigation I traced it back to 
>> > sfr's
>> > merge of pinctrl/for-next.
>>
>> Hm, saw this a bit late I guess.
>>
>> Torvalds has merged my trees, is there a problem in mainline
>> that need to be addressed or did this fix itself?
>
> No, it's buggered in Linus tree as well.

OK fixing it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to