On 25/08/2015 10:50, Feng Wu wrote: > Define two weak arch callbacks so that archs that don't need > them don't need define them. > > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <[email protected]> > --- > virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > index d7a230f..f3050b9 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > @@ -256,6 +256,16 @@ static void irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct > kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd) > write_seqcount_end(&irqfd->irq_entry_sc); > } > > +void __attribute__((weak)) kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop( > + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) > +{ > +} > + > +void __attribute__((weak)) kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start( > + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) > +{ > +} > + > static int > kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args) > { >
This would belong into the patch that adds CONFIG_KVM_HAVE_IRQ_BYPASS (and the functions should be under "#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_HAVE_IRQ_BYPASS"). Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
