Commit-ID:  bf6445631c6f00882b25516a174d5073ce0c6f81
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/bf6445631c6f00882b25516a174d5073ce0c6f81
Author:     Peter Senna Tschudin <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:08:53 +0200
Committer:  Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:31:52 -0300

perf tools: Bool functions shouldn't return -1

Returning a negative value for a boolean function seem to have the
undesired effect of returning true. Replace -1 by false in a
bool-returning function.

The diff of the .s file before and after the change (for x86_64):

  3907c3907
  <     movl    $1, %ebx
  ---
  >     xorl    %ebx, %ebx

while if -1 is replaced by true, the diff is empty.

This issue was found by the following Coccinelle semantic patch:

  <smpl>
  @@
  identifier f;
  constant C;
  typedef bool;
  @@
  bool f (...){
  <+...
  * return -C;
  ...+>
  }
  </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Fleming <[email protected]>
Cc: Milos Vyletel <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
---
 tools/perf/util/util.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/util.c b/tools/perf/util/util.c
index 7acafb3..c2cd9bf2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/util.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/util.c
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ bool find_process(const char *name)
 
        dir = opendir(procfs__mountpoint());
        if (!dir)
-               return -1;
+               return false;
 
        /* Walk through the directory. */
        while (ret && (d = readdir(dir)) != NULL) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to