On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 05:47:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:17:54AM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > I already said questions, opinion and concerns but anything is not clear
> > > until now. Only clear thing I could hear is just "compaction stats are
> > > better" which is not enough for me. Sorry.
> > >
> > > 1) https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/15/33
> > > 2) https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/21/2
> >
> > Could you please stop perverting the facts, I did answer to that:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/21/753.
> >
> > Apart from that, an opinion is not necessarily something I would
> > answer. Concerns about zsmalloc are not in the scope of this patch's
> > discussion. If you have any concerns regarding this particular patch,
> > please let us know.
>
> Yes, I don't want to interrupt zbud thing which is Seth should maintain
> and I respect his decision but the reason I nacked is you said this patch
> aims for supporing zbud into zsmalloc for determinism.
zram
Sorry for the typo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
