On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Sedat Dilek wrote:

> > This however:
> >
> > [   24.824639] hardirqs last  enabled at (7913): [<ffffffff8192a2b2>] 
> > _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x32/0x60
> > [   24.824646] hardirqs last disabled at (7914): [<ffffffff81120e37>] 
> > del_timer_sync+0x37/0x110
> >
> > combined with the stacktrace above, doesn't still make too much sense; IRQ
> > disable/enable is properly paired in del_timer_sync() and timer base lock
> > locking.
> >
> > Could you look into the generated assembly whether the sequence
> >
> >         local_irq_save(flags);
> >         lock_map_acquire(&timer->lockdep_map);
> >         lock_map_release(&timer->lockdep_map);
> >         local_irq_restore(flags);
> >
> > in del_timer_sync() hasn't been optimized in some damaging way?
> >
> 
> I am looking into my CLANG objdump...
> 
> $ egrep -nr 'save|restore|acquire|release'
> objdump-Dr_kernel-workqueue_o_CLANG-3-7.txt | egrep 'irq|map'
> 5718:                   4601: R_X86_64_PC32     
> _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore-0x4
> 5766:                   4699: R_X86_64_PC32     _raw_spin_lock_irqsave-0x4
> 6173:                   4bd9: R_X86_64_PC32     _raw_spin_lock_irqsave-0x4
> 6265:                   4d05: R_X86_64_PC32     
> _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore-0x4
> 
> ...this is what I have.
> 
> Does that help?

It doesn't. I am asking for disassembly of del_timer_sync() (that's in 
kernel/time/timer.o).

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to