Purely cosmetic, but the complex "if" condition looks annoying to me. Especially because it is not consistent with OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN check which adds another if/continue.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> --- mm/oom_kill.c | 18 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index b6b8c78..c189ee5 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -583,14 +583,18 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p, * pending fatal signal. */ rcu_read_lock(); - for_each_process(p) - if (p->mm == mm && !same_thread_group(p, victim) && - !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) { - if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) - continue; + for_each_process(p) { + if (p->mm != mm) + continue; + if (same_thread_group(p, victim)) + continue; + if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) + continue; + if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) + continue; - do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true); - } + do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true); + } rcu_read_unlock(); mmput(mm); -- 2.4.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
