On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:39:10PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Why? Greg is against ioctl interface so it will be reworked, by besides > > that what is wrong with the concept of binding msi-x interrupt to > > eventfd? > > It's not the binding. Managing msi-x just needs more than the puny > 2 ioctls to get # of vectors and set eventfd. > > It interacts in strange ways with reset, and with PM, and ...
Can we please drop this thread right now. The proposed patches are not acceptable as-is, and everyone knows that. The developers are going to go off and redo things and propose a new set of patches, let's see what the result is of that work and we can take it from there. Random complaints about this existing patch is not useful at all anymore, there's nothing needed to convince anyone about anything here. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
