Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags {
> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3 = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) 2,
> /* Provide indication device is assigned by a Virtual Machine Manager */
> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_ASSIGNED = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) 4,
> + /* Get VPD from function 0 VPD */
> + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_VPD_REF_F0 = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 8),
> };
>
> enum pci_irq_reroute_variant {In this hunk I happened to notice the change in how these values are assigned. Should the new value remain (1 << 8) or should it fall in line with the older implementation and simply be 8? Or should it be 256? It depends on which kind of consistency you prefer for the backport. -- Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
