On Fri, Oct 09 2015, Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> It's hard not to agree with the overall "let's make it more robust if it
> can be done sanely+cheaply+cleanly". I was a bit skeptical about whether
> those three requirements could be met, since we'd have to do
> byte-by-byte traversal of the string, maybe-copying it to the output as
> we go along, but then right-alignment would require us to do a memmove,
> but not before we've done some complicated bookkeeping
> exercise. However, now that I read the source again, it seems that Al
> Viro already did that exercise when he added dentry(). So maybe it's
> doable without a net increase in LOC.
Something like this. The net increase is because I added a
comment. Passes the new printf test suite, but I'm not sure that's
thorough enough yet - still, it's better than nothing. There's also this
small bonus:
$ scripts/bloat-o-meter /tmp/vsprintf.o.{old,new}
add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 178/-245 (-67)
function old new delta
widen_string.isra - 178 +178
string.isra 186 109 -77
dentry_name.isra 358 190 -168
Rasmus Villemoes (3):
lib/vsprintf.c: pull out padding code from dentry_name()
lib/vsprintf.c: move string() below widen_string()
lib/vsprintf.c: eliminate potential race in string()
lib/vsprintf.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
