On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 14:12:25 -0400 Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > I do understand the feeling here :( > > But I do hope that you reconsider your position here. We had such a great > experience with the drm-ras using the netlink and I was really hoping that > we could just reproduce the same experience here. > > Netlink is such an incredible API. > > Would it help if I take the maintainership of this drm-fabric netlink > along with the drm-ras one, ensuring the same consistent and clean usage?
Hard call, I have nothing to complain about with the drm-ras work. Purely worried about the time :( Well, that, and DRMs general love of Rust which seems to be about 10x less development efficient for us.. Let's start by feeding this + the spec into your LLM https://github.com/masoncl/review-prompts/blob/main/kernel/subsystem/netlink.md
