On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Grant Likely <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> >> >> Since commit a43f2cbbb009f96 ("leds: leds-gpio: Make use of device property >> API") it is no longer possible to register multiple gpio leds without passing >> the 'label' property. >> >> According to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt: >> >> "Optional properties for child nodes: >> - label : The label for this LED. If omitted, the label is >> taken from the node name (excluding the unit address)." >> >> So retrieve the node name when the 'label' property is absent to keep the old >> behaviour and fix this regression. >> >> Reported-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]> > > (Assuming that creating a fwnode_get_name() function turns out to be a > non-starter.)
Thanks, Grant. Maybe we should go with this v2 patch initially to fix the regression and then we could consider introducing fwnode_get_name() in a future patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
