On 12/02/15 22:19, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 10, 2015, Miguel Trujillo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 09/02/15 12:37, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>> In case anyone ever wanted to do something for GNU Linux-libre but never >>> felt able to... checking that the links are not dangling, and whether >>> the repositories we point to are still active, would be a very welcome >>> contribution! > >> Hello, I've found this rot links using wget at >> http://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/ > > Thanks. I guess I was not clear as to what the goal was. > > Checking broken links is easy to automate, so don't worry too much about > that. >
I apologize, I did not understand what was needed :P > The harder problem I wanted to address was that of long-unmaintained > repositories that aren't marked as obsolete on our site. > > I'm undecided as to whether to remove them altogether, move them to a > "historical" section, or something else. > > Trying to reach maintainers of each repository to check whether they > just dropped it, or passed them on to someone else who hosts it > elsewhere, that sort of thing. I will review repositories and I will list those obsolete. > > It sure is more work than running a broken-link-checking spider, but I > guess it will have a more positive effect, overall, to visitors of our > site. I don't want visitors to feel like they're visiting an archeology > museum ;-) > +1 :) > Thanks, > Saludos! -- Miguel _______________________________________________ linux-libre mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsfla.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-libre
