On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 15:58, Jules Agee <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm getting more complaints lately from users on my network about spam. > Investigating the complaints reveals they get between five or ten per > day on average. This is about what I expect in my own inbox, and I don't > mind because it's a lot better than it used to be. > > But it seems like people have higher expectations these days, and I'm > wondering if I should consider alternatives to what I'm doing now. > > Right now I'm using postgrey and spamassassin. According to my server > logs, internet MXs make about 1.5 million connections to our server per > week. 90% of those are blocked by greylisting, about 4% are tagged by > SpamAssassin, and the remaining 6% are delivered to users' inboxes > unchanged. > > Are any of you getting better results with another solution? > > -Jules
I use Maia Mailguard, and have few complaints about it. It uses spamassassin underneath the covers, but the web interface allows much better control for the users. Also, do you get regular updates of rules and such? Kurt
