Le 5 nov. 08 à 12:10, Finn Thain a écrit :
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote:
+#define swim_write(base, reg, v) out_8(&(base)->write_##reg, (v))
+#define swim_read(base, reg) in_8(&(base)->read_##reg)
+
+/* bits in phase register */
+
+#define SEEK_POSITIVE 0x070
+#define SEEK_NEGATIVE 0x074
+#define STEP 0x071
+#define MOTOR_ON 0x072
+#define MOTOR_OFF 0x076
+#define INDEX 0x073
+#define EJECT 0x077
+#define SETMFM 0x171
+#define SETGCR 0x175
+
+#define RELAX 0x033
+#define LSTRB 0x008
+
+#define CA_MASK 0x077
+
+/* Select values for swim_select and swim_readbit */
+
+#define STEP_DIR 0x070
+#define STEPPING 0x071
+#define MOTOR_ON 0x072
MOTOR_ON is defined twice. Are STEP & STEPPING the same?
In fact, I took this from swim3 driver.
Values used here (with swim_select() and swim_readbit()) are closely
linked with values defined for phase register.
But I think it is a good idea to rename them.
+#define ELAX 0x073 /* also eject in progress */
+#define READ_DATA_0 0x074
+#define TWOMEG_DRIVE 0x075
+#define SINGLE_SIDED 0x076
+#define DRIVE_PRESENT 0x077
+#define DISK_IN 0x170
+#define WRITE_PROT 0x171
+#define TRACK_ZERO 0x172
+#define TACHO 0x173
+#define READ_DATA_1 0x174
+#define MFM_MODE 0x175
+#define SEEK_COMPLETE 0x176
+#define ONEMEG_MEDIA 0x177
+
+/* Bits in handshake register */
+
+#define MARK_BYTE 0x01
+#define CRC_ZERO 0x02
+#define RDDATA 0x04
+#define SENSE 0x08
+#define MOTEN 0x10
+#define ERROR 0x20
+#define DAT2BYTE 0x40
+#define DAT1BYTE 0x80
+
+/* bits in setup register */
+
+#define S_INV_WDATA 0x01
+#define S_3_5_SELECT 0x02
+#define S_GCR 0x04
+#define S_FCLK_DIV2 0x08
+#define S_ERROR_CORR 0x10
+#define S_IBM_DRIVE 0x20
+#define S_GCR_WRITE 0x40
+#define S_TIMEOUT 0x80
+
+/* bits in mode register */
+
+#define CLFIFO 0x01
+#define ENBL1 0x02
+#define ENBL2 0x04
+#define ACTION 0x08
+#define WRITE_MODE 0x10
+#define HEDSEL 0x20
+#define MOTON 0x80
There extra tabs are still here.
Yes, sorry, I correct this (again...).
+ break;
+ default:
+ swim_base = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (dev->id == 0 && base)
+ swim_base = (struct swim *)base;
+
+ if (swim_base == NULL)
+ return -ENODEV;
I think dev->id is always 0?
Yes, but as platform driver allows to have several instance of
platform device I though if we suppose we have several SWIM we should
use the module parameter only with the first one.
I can remove this if you think it is useless.
Thank you for your comments.
Regards,
Laurent
----------------------- Laurent Vivier ----------------------
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."
- Alan Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
