Hi David,

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:13 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:16 AM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> And remember about checkpatch.pl which was hardly content with the patch.
>>>>
>>>> Only because checkpatch looks at the _new_ lines, and doesn't compare the
>>>> styles of the old and new lines.
>>>
>>> You really should fix the line you are changing to use tabs, please respin
>>> with this in mind, thanks.
>>
>> As that would add more to the TAB/space mess^H^H^Hix, I prepended a
>> patch to fix all whitespace errors.
>
> I implicitly asked you not to do this, now things are more difficult
> and your original change will take longer to integrate.

Sorry, I didn't get that message. I was puzzled by your request to correct
the whitespace of the lines I touched only, which causes them to stand out
in a block of old non-compliant whitespace.

> Becuase now it isn't a patch set I can easily just apply quickly in
> the current merge window, and it's therefore a series you'll have to
> resubmit later when the merge window closes and the net-next tree
> opens up again.

Nevermind, it's not urgent nor critical. I will resubmit for the next merge
window.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to