MT9M001 datasheet says, that the data is ready on the falling edge of the pixel
clock, but the driver wrongly sets the SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING flag. Changing
this doesn't seem to produce any visible difference, still, it is better to
comply to the datasheet.

Reported-by: Sascha Oppermann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
---

Objections?

 drivers/media/video/mt9m001.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mt9m001.c b/drivers/media/video/mt9m001.c
index fa7e509..684f62f 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/mt9m001.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/mt9m001.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static unsigned long mt9m001_query_bus_param(struct 
soc_camera_device *icd)
        struct mt9m001 *mt9m001 = container_of(icd, struct mt9m001, icd);
        struct soc_camera_link *icl = mt9m001->client->dev.platform_data;
        /* MT9M001 has all capture_format parameters fixed */
-       unsigned long flags = SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING |
+       unsigned long flags = SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING |
                SOCAM_HSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH | SOCAM_VSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH |
                SOCAM_DATA_ACTIVE_HIGH | SOCAM_MASTER;
 
-- 
1.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to