Hans,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 5:41 PM
> To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Chaithrika U S
> Subject: Re: [PULL] http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-davinci
> 
> Hi Mauro,
> 
> > Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> >> On Thursday 23 April 2009 13:35:02 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:46:00 +0200
> >>> Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Mauro,
> >>>>
> >>>> Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-
> davinci
> >>>> for the
> >>>> following:
> >>>>
> >>>> - v4l: TI THS7303 video amplifier driver code
> >>>>
> >>> +static int ths7303_setvalue(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, v4l2_std_id
> std)
> >>> +{
> >>> +       int err = 0;
> >>> +       u8 val;
> >>> +       struct i2c_client *client;
> >>> +
> >>> +       client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
> >>> +
> >>> +       if ((std & V4L2_STD_NTSC) || (std & V4L2_STD_PAL)) {
> >>> +               val = 0x02;
> >>> +               v4l2_dbg(1, debug, sd, "setting value for SDTV
> >>> format\n");
> >>> +       } else {
> >>> +               val = 0x00;
> >>> +               v4l2_dbg(1, debug, sd, "disabling all channels\n");
> >>> +       }
> >>> +
> >>>
> >>> Hmm... Are you sure that the above check is ok? The standards
> you're
> >>> allowing
> >>> are: PAL/BGDKHI and NTSC (except for NTSC/443). So, standards like
> >>> PAL/N,
> >>> PAL/N', PAL/60, PAL/M will stay away.
> >>>
> >>> If what you want is all standards but SECAM, then the correct
> syntax
> >>> would be something like:
> >>>   if (std & (V4L2_STD_ALL & ~V4L2_STD_SECAM))
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> - Analog Devices ADV7343 video encoder driver
> >>>>
> >>> +#define SD_STD_NTSC            (0x00)
> >>> +#define SD_STD_PAL_BDGHI       (0x01)
> >>> +#define SD_STD_PAL_M           (0x02)
> >>> +#define SD_STD_PAL_N           (0x03)
> >>>
> >>> Hmm... from the comments at the beginning of the .c file, it seems
> that
> >>> the
> >>> hardware supports all standards but SECAM. The above register
> >>> definitions also
> >>> specifies PAL/M and PAL/M as supported standards.
> >>>
> >>> However, by looking at the std_into table:
> >>>
> >>> +static const struct adv7343_std_info
> >>> +       adv7343_composite_std_info[] = {
> >>> +       {
> >>> +               SD_STD_NTSC, 0x1F, 0x7C, 0xF0, 0x21, V4L2_STD_NTSC,
> >>> +       },
> >>> +       {
> >>> +               SD_STD_PAL_BDGHI, 0xCB, 0x8A, 0x09, 0x2A,
> V4L2_STD_PAL,
> >>> +       },
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct adv7343_std_info
> >>> +       adv7343_component_std_info[] = {
> >>> +       {
> >>> +               SD_STD_NTSC, 0x1F, 0x7C, 0xF0, 0x21, V4L2_STD_NTSC,
> >>> +       },
> >>> +       {
> >>> +               SD_STD_PAL_BDGHI, 0x1F, 0x7C, 0xF0, 0x21,
> V4L2_STD_PAL,
> >>> +       },
> >>> +};
> >>>
> >>> Hmm.. on the last table, you are using a FSC = 3,579,545.45 Hz for
> both
> >>> PAL and
> >>> NTSC? This seems wrong to my eyes.
> >>>
> >>> Also, both tables have several supported standards missed.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Mauro,
> >>
> >> Are there TVs in Brazil that are unable to handle standard NTSC-M on
> the
> >> composite or S-Video inputs?
> > Yes. There are models that only handles PAL-M.
> >
> >> There are no encoders in v4l-dvb that do
> >> something special for PAL-M.
> >>
> > Maybe because nobody tested they and reported an issue? Before I
> started
> > working on this,
> > most drivers were broken with PAL/M: saa7113, cx88, ivtv, ...
> 
> To be fair, it is very hard to implement something you cannot test
> yourself, and most people can only test PAL/NTSC.
> 
> >> All just check against 525 vs 625 line standards.
> >> And I can't imagine that that will cause problems for Brazilian TVs.
> >>
> > If you don't encode with PAL/M, then some TV sets won't work. Also,
> even
> > on TV sets that supports multiple standards, sometimes we need to
> > disable autodetection of NTSC, because this is broken on some TV
> sets.
> > I've personally experienced this trouble with two TV sets, including
> a
> > brand-new LCD1080p TV set I bought this year. On some conditions, if
> you
> > let auto NTSC/PAL-M enabled, it miss-detects the color carrier, and
> > changes to the other standard (missing the colors) for some seconds,
> and
> > then returns back. So, you have moments with colors and moments
> without.
> >
> > It should also be noticed that there are several devices (TV sets,
> DVD
> > players, etc) manufactured abroad that people assumes that PAL/M
> color
> > carrier is equal to NTSC (AFAIK, the same occurs with PAL/Nc). Since
> the
> > color carriers are somewhat different, this produces a very annoying
> > effect: the color image will present a static image as a image with
> > colors moving, since there will be a frequency shift between the
> > horizontal frequency rate and the pixel sampling rate (that are
> derived
> > from the color carrier on several decoders), causing color detection
> > misleading at the pixels. So, the pixels at the boundary of a shape
> have
> > their colors oscillating.
> 
> Very interesting. I honestly thought that all TVs everywhere (except
> perhaps very old ones) would be able to handle 'standard' PAL or NTSC
> on
> their Composite and S-Video inputs.
> 
> >
> >> I think these drivers should just use V4L2_STD_525_60 and
> >> V4L2_STD_625_50,
> >> just like saa7127 does.
> >>
> > I have no device here with saa7127, so I'm not sure how this works
> with
> > other standards.
> 
> Currently it does only PAL and NTSC. Although it can do SECAM it is
> never
> actually enabled.
> 
> > But, expecially on encoding, you should be able to
> > produce the right standard. I can't see it producing a right standard
> if
> > you just use V4L2_STD_525_60 and V4L2_STD_625_50 with s-video.  At
> least
> > on one place, you should say to the encoder what should be the color
> > carrier frequency and if it will encode with PAL, NTSC or SECAM.
> >
> >
> > By the way, what's the rationale of not allowing the driver to encode
> on
> > all supported formats?
> 
> Generally, not being able to test all the possible standards. Or not
> being
> aware of this problem at all :-). I agree that this driver should be
> enhanced to support more standards.
> 
> Chaithrika, can you take a look at this based on Mauro's input?
> 
Hans,

I will look into this soon after I am done with my current tasks.

Thanks,
Chaithrika

> Regards,
> 
>         Hans
> 
> --
> Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG
> 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to