Am 03.02.2010 21:52, schrieb Devin Heitmueller:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Ringel <stefan.rin...@arcor.de> wrote:
>
>> signed-off-by: Stefan Ringel <stefan.rin...@arcor.de>
>>
>> --- a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-cards.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-cards.c
>> @@ -221,12 +239,13 @@ struct usb_device_id tm6000_id_table [] = {
>> { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x6600), .driver_info =
>> TM6010_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_900H },
>> { USB_DEVICE(0x6000, 0xdec0), .driver_info =
>> TM6010_BOARD_BEHOLD_WANDER },
>> { USB_DEVICE(0x6000, 0xdec1), .driver_info =
>> TM6010_BOARD_BEHOLD_VOYAGER },
>> { USB_DEVICE(0x0ccd, 0x0086), .driver_info =
>> TM6010_BOARD_TERRATEC_CINERGY_HYBRID_XE },
>> { },
>> };
>>
>> /* Tuner callback to provide the proper gpio changes needed for xc2028 */
>>
>> -static int tm6000_tuner_callback(void *ptr, int component, int command,
>> int arg)
>> +int tm6000_tuner_callback(void *ptr, int component, int command, int arg)
>> {
>>
> Why was the static removed from this declaration? What could possibly
> be calling this from outside the module? And if there were something
> that needed it, the declaration would have to be moved to a header
> file so it could be included elsewhere (which should be in this same
> patch).
>
> Just to be clear, the fact that I am going through these patches
> should not be taken personally - I'm just trying to give you some
> advice on what you need to do to ensure the patches can be accepted
> upstream and be reviewed with minimal cost to the other developers.
>
> Devin
>
>
1. It broke by building.
2. callback for dvb frontend (tm6000-dvb.c) so can the tuner a reset
send if it goes in DVB mode (it must reload the firmware)
--
Stefan Ringel <stefan.rin...@arcor.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
