Hi Andy, On Tuesday 06 April 2010 13:06:18 Andy Walls wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 08:37 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
[snip] > > Again, I still don't know whether we should do this. It is dangerously > > seductive because it would be so trivial to implement. > > It's like watching ships run aground on a shallow sandbar that all the > locals know about. The waters off of 'Point /sys' are full of usability > shipwrecks. I don't know if it's some siren's song, the lack of a light > house, or just strange currents that deceive even seasoned > navigators.... > > Let the user run 'v4l2-ctl -d /dev/videoN -L' to learn about the control > metatdata. It's not as easy as typing 'cat', but the user base using > sysfs in an interactive shell or shell script should also know how to > use v4l2-ctl. In embedded systems, the final system deployment should > not need the control metadata available from sysfs in a command shell > anyway. I fully agree with this. If we push the idea one step further, why do we need to expose controls in sysfs at all ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
