Hi all, We are beginning to have raw bayer image sensor drivers in the mainline. Typically such sensors are not controlled by general purpose applications but e.g. require a camera control algorithm framework in user space. This needs to be implemented in libv4l for general purpose applications to work properly on this kind of hardware.
These sensors expose controls such as - Per-component gain controls. Red, blue, green (blue) and green (red) gains. - Link frequency. The frequency of the data link from the sensor to the bridge. - Horizontal and vertical blanking. None of these controls are suitable for use of general purpose applications (let alone the end user!) but for the camera control algorithms. We have a control class called V4L2_CTRL_CLASS_CAMERA for camera controls. However, the controls in this class are relatively high level controls which are suitable for end user. The algorithms in the libv4l or a webcam could implement many of these controls whereas I see that only V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE might be implemented by raw bayer sensors. My question is: would it make sense to create a new class of controls for the low level sensor controls in a similar fashion we have a control class for the flash controls? -- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi jabber/XMPP/Gmail: sai...@retiisi.org.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
