Em 13-10-2011 20:19, Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Benjamin Larsson <benja...@southpole.se> 
> wrote:
>> On 10/13/2011 07:48 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Antti Palosaari <cr...@iki.fi> wrote:
>>>>> You were close:  em2884, drx-k, xc5000, and for analog it uses the
>>>>> afv4910b.
>>>> Then it should be peace of cake at least for digital side.
>>> I don't think we've ever done xc5000 on an em28xx before, so it's
>>> entirely possible that the xc5000 clock stretching will expose bugs in
>>> the em28xx i2c implementation (it uncovered bugs in essentially every
>>> other bridge driver I did work on).
>>>
>>> That, and we don't know how much is hard-coded into the drx-k driver
>>> making it specific to the couple of device it's currently being used
>>> with.
>>>
>>> But yeah, it shouldn't be rocket science.  I added support for the
>>> board in my OSX driver and it only took me a couple of hours.
>>>
>>> Devin
>>>
>>
>> Eddi De Pieri has patches for the HVR-930C that works somewhat. The
>> hardware in that stick is the same.
>>
>> MvH
>> Benjamin Larsson
> 
> While the basic chips used are different, they are completely
> different hardware designs and likely have different GPIO
> configurations as well as IF specs.

The IF settings for xc5000 with DRX-K are solved with this patch:
        http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7932/

Basically, DRX-K will use whatever IF the tuner uses.

I've sent to Eddi to get some feedback, but he never returned back.

> 
> Devin
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to