Em 13-09-2012 20:19, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > Em Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:48:52 -0400 > Steven Toth <st...@kernellabs.com> escreveu: > >> Mauro, please read below, a new set of patches I'm submitting for merge. >> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >>> On Thu August 16 2012 19:39:51 Steven Toth wrote: >>>>>> So, I've ran v4l2-compliance and it pointed out a few things that I've >>>>>> fixed, but it also does a few things that (for some reason) I can't >>>>>> seem to catch. One particular test is on (iirc) s_fmt. It attempts to >>>>>> set ATSC but by ioctl callback never receives ATSC in the norm/id arg, >>>>>> it actually receives 0x0. This feels more like a bug in the test. >>>>>> Either way, I have some if (std & ATSC) return -EINVAL, but it still >>>>>> appears to fail the test. >>>> >>>> Oddly enough. If I set tvnorms to something valid, then compliance >>>> passes but gstreamer >>>> fails to run, looks like some kind of confusion about either the >>>> current established >>>> norm, or a failure to establish a norm. >>>> >>>> For the time being I've set tvnorms to 0 (with a comment) and removed >>>> current_norm. >>> >>> Well, this needs to be sorted, because something is clearly amiss. >> >> Agreed. I just can't see what's wrong. I may need your advise / >> eyeballs on this. I'd be willing to provide logs that show gstreamer >> accessing the driver and exiting. It needs fixed, I've tried, I just >> can't see why gstreamer fails. >> >> On the main topic of merge.... As promised, I spent quite a bit of >> time this week reworking the code based on the feedback. I also >> flattened all of these patches into a single patchset and upgraded to >> the latest re-org tree. >> >> The source notes describe in a little more detail the major changes: >> http://git.kernellabs.com/?p=stoth/media_tree.git;a=commit;h=f295dd63e2f7027e327daad730eb86f2c17e3b2c >> >> Mauro, so, I hereby submit for your review/merge again, the updated >> patchset. *** Please comment. *** > > I'll comment patch by patch. Let's hope the ML will get this email. Not sure, > as it tends to discard big emails like that. > > This is the comment of patch 1/4. >
Patch 2 is trivial. It is obviously OK. Patch 3 also looked OK on my eyes. Regards, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
