Linux-Misc Digest #650, Volume #19 Mon, 29 Mar 99 14:13:15 EST
Contents:
Re: Can't compile kernel (yan seiner)
Help! can't reboot my linux (jofai)
Re: No-Win Modem Situation (Christopher)
Re: am-utils (amd) & smbfs (smbmount) -- automount frustation ("Steven R. Levitt")
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... (David M. Cook)
Re: Help me spend $2,000 on a new Linux-based computer (Allen)
Re: Linux on Compaq ProLian 1850R - any luck? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
RPM Errors on installing GNOME. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: #include <math.h> - problem (Brian McCauley)
Re: Can't compile kernel (Gary Portnoy)
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... (jedi)
Weird Netscape Question (Mykool)
OS support for Proc Temps? (Larry Blumette)
I can't get my SB16 to work (2.0.35 and 2.2.1) (Edwin van Geelen)
Re: ?Corel Netwinder prices? ("Michael Faurot")
GL Quake + 3DFX card. Slooowwww. (Paul Richards)
Migrated to 2.2.x, but "issues" remain (Frampton Steve R)
Re: ICQ auf Linux (ckchan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: yan seiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't compile kernel
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 06:31:32 -0500
The kernel source must be in /usr/src/linux-2.x.x - I just went through this
same problem.
HTH,
Yan
St�phane Huguet wrote:
> I'm a little new to Linux;actually on rh5.2 - kernel 2.0.34 -I've tried
> compiling kernel 2.0.36, 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 : always the same error in make
> dep : the mkdep script can't find the included files (stdio.h...) - Does
> anyone have an idea on why these files have disappeared, and how to
> recover them ?
> Thanks in advance !
------------------------------
From: jofai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Help! can't reboot my linux
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 06:56:04 GMT
Hi:
I still cant get back to boot the Linux since i think the rescue
disk is corrupted. when i load the LILO disk in drive A, the following
shows what the screen display:
Press <return> (or wait 10 seconds) to boot your Red Hat Linux
system from /dev/sda5. If you want to use a rescue disk, type "rescue"
now.
Boot: linux........
Loading Linux.......
Error 0x02
Boot: rescue
Loading Linux.......
Error 0x02
Everytime i type linux or rescue, i give me the Error0x02, i dont
know why, do you know what other method i can do to get the Linux back,
thx for your helping:).
jofai schrieb:
>
> Hi:
> First, i got a Win98 installed in my C drive and everytime i start
to
> boot my system, it will show "LILO boot:" , so i cant access either
Linux or
> Win98 OS. But after i formated my C driver and reinstall the Win98, i
> couldnt see "LILO boot:" anymore and my comp only boot the Win98.
Could
> anyone tell me how to setup so that i can boot my Linux again( its
better
> have a choice like "LILO boot:" ) ? thx!
Win98 had overwritten your MBR. You have to reinstall LILO.
Julius
------------------------------
From: Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: No-Win Modem Situation
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 12:17:06 -0600
Matthias Warkus wrote:
>
> It was the Sat, 27 Mar 1999 15:10:00 -0700...
> ..and James Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Matthias Warkus wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > No. Basically, Winmodems rely on some "real-time" features of Windows
> > > 9x... that is, the ability of a client program to futz with interrupts
> > > and such directly.
> > >
> > > mawa
> >
> > And under Linux, this is quite rightly not allowed, am I right? In that
> > case we really could be in trouble.
>
> Depends on what you mean by "trouble". I don't consider it to be all
> that bad that Linux doesn't support Winmodems, since they are rather
> brain-damaged pieces of hardware which bog down your CPU and which can
> probably even lock your system up if something goes wrong with this
> pseudo-real-time stuff.
>
> mawa
> --
> MicroSoft product, BTW. Real dirty programming.
> -- Henrik Clausen
I figure if linux is growing and winmodems don't work I'm sure that some manufactures
will still make
"real" modems. And not everybody is running windows on "pc type" hardware. I give the
advice. Ask the
salesman if the modem is a winmodem(tm) If it is ask them to not include it and
subtract the cost of the
modem. Take the money and go buy a "real" modem. If the word gets around and people
stop buying them
companys will stop making them. I think that's about all we can do. And also I could
care less even if
somebody DOES write Linux drivers. I still won't use a winmodem(tm). MO.
Chris
------------------------------
From: "Steven R. Levitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: am-utils (amd) & smbfs (smbmount) -- automount frustation
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:04:33 GMT
I realize now, that I didn't make it clear that my WinNT shares physically
reside on another PC on my peer-to-peer network. Sorry.
I don't want to run a NFS server on the NT machine, so I can't mount the
shares automatically via fstab. Instead, I'm using the smbfs utility, and,
of the 3 automount utilities I know of, it seems that only the amd utility
is capable of dealing with the smbmount command. If not for that, I would
be flying with either autofs or automount.
Is there anything else you can think of?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>I ignore all about Samba stuff. Are you sure you need autofs to mount
>them ? Can't you just add a few lines for them in your /etc/fstab
>file?
>
>Anyway I work with autofs (very easy to configure) with a 2.2.4 kernel
>(autofs support is valid since 2.0.3x kernels but for these it is jus
>experimental).
>
>My /etc/auto.master file :
>
>/mnt /etc/auto.removable --timeout 3
>
>It indicates autofs that it has to listen every action on the /mnt
>directory, that the file containing the mount descriptio is in
>/etc/auto.removable, and that it can automatically unmount the fs
>after 3 second of inactivity (it allows you to change the cdrom or
>your floppy).
>
>And my /etc/auto.removable file:
>
>cdrom -fstype=iso9660,ro :/dev/cdrom
>fd0 -fstype=auto :/dev/fd0
>
>It indicates to mount the local /dev/cdrom when someone accesse the
>/mnt/cdrom directory (the other option are the same than mount's).
>
>Something important : RH is configured for amd by default. To
>configure autofs you have to change all occurences of the K08autofs
>for S72autofs, and S72amd to K08amd in the /etc/rc.d/rc{3,4,5}.d
>directories.
>
>Manu
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David M. Cook)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 07:36:04 GMT
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:10:30 +1200, Stuart Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Think non technical for a change. Linux is a great operating system if you
>are technically minded - which I assume all of us in this NG are ;) - but
>for ordinary small business owners, it is a complete mystery. At least
>Windows NT looks like something they know, and they don't have to learn
>command line syntaxes for doing basic admin tasks.
This is where things like the Cobalt Qube come in, providing essentially a
network appliance running Linux. These things are even easier to set up
than an NT box.
Dave Cook
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Help me spend $2,000 on a new Linux-based computer
Date: 29 Mar 1999 07:41:10 GMT
On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:25:56 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I've gotten the go-ahead from my better half (read: my wife) to spend
>around 2K on a new system. I'd like to hear _specific_ success and/or
>horror stories on systems and peripherals that have worked and not
>worked with Linux. My prequisites:
>
>400mhz CPU
easy enough- $50 on pricewatch will get you a bare Celeron 266 that with good
heatsinking ($20), BX chipset motherboard ($100), and PC100 SDRAM will easily
run 400 Mhz for years with no troubles. I'd recommend the 300A @ 450 Mhz
though, (it costs a few $ more, though, @ $ 67ish)
>96mb RAM
Why only 96 Mb? 128 Mb CAS 3 PC100 is about $170?
>8mb video card
Matrox AGP G200 8 Mb ($85) has great 2-D performance and driver support, though
you will need to upgrade at least to Xfree86 version 3.3.3.1 for it and most of
the newer cards...
>19" monitor
Last time I checked those were running about $450-500?
>sound card, speakers
SB16 is still one of the best supported and performing cards available for what
most people use PC sound for ($25-30)--speakers could be $10 or less
>4GB hard drive
Not cost effective anymore. Get at least something like a Maxtor 8.4 Gb ($135)
for about the same price you'd be able to get the 4 Gb one at www.tjt.com
>CD-ROM
Any old ATAPI 4x or higher will do fine... ($50 for a 44x generic)
>
>Bonuses:
>DVD
don't bother with it yet for Linux, and you may wish to wait for windows too if
you were going to dual boot--DVD-RAM is out now, and by the time the prices fall
to reality, there may be driver support for Linux too
>Color printer
make sure it's not a proprietary Windows only printer
>Tape backup
What job are you doing that you may need this? Could not a CD-RW do this job
also? The best tape drives are quite expensive, and the cheaper ones may cause
you much more hairloss, especially if your were trusting any mission-critical to
them... also see DVD-RAM section
>Dual CPUs
Not really much more expensive if you were doing something that will make use of
it? Many good dual boards will also have usable on-board peripherals too,
lowering your costs further. You could even do Dual-Celerons on the cheap if
you were technically inclined to to the surgery neccessary.... Write or post
for more info if interested.
>
>Notes:
>I don't play video games, so 3D video doesn't mean anything to me.
>I'm open to build-my-own or buying from Micron, Gateway, Dell, etc.
>
You seemed to miss the most important parts of the specs--- What do you want
this machine to be capable of doing? You could put all that hardware together,
and not even load an OS on it if you just wanted bragging rights to say that you
had it... :-))
I've built many machines on the 300A Celeron platform (all running at 450 Mhz)
that were Linux compatible for less than $1200, had only 64 Mb Ram, 17"
monitor, 8.4 Gb hard drive, and otherwise exceeded your requirements, and though
I built these for customers who wanted to run Windose (-$100 w/o), nearly all
you ask for could still be done for less than $1600 easily, but your application
and needs should dictate where the extras should go.
Allen
(email addy; user ID portion has a numeral one in place of word
onespoiler, and of course, delete the bogus secondary domain of nospam.)
PC/hardware Guru, and Linux Newbie
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Linux on Compaq ProLian 1850R - any luck?
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:50:15 GMT
Hi
The driver for 10/100 on 1850R is tlan. Insert the tlan module after
installation. Linux does not recognize this card during installation. As
mentioned below give this command "insmod tlan" and execute netconf and
configure the network card. This will put u on the net.
Regards
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"C. David Wilde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have several 1850R's here, and I have never seen one of the embedded
netowrk
> cards on them work. All of our systems are running NT, and we have added PCI
> 10/100 NIC's to them because NT will not see the embeded for shit, and as much
> as I hate to say it, it is a pretty brainless operation to get NT to see a
NIC,
> unlike linux. My advice is to get a PCI NIC and disable the POS that comes on
> the board.
>
> Dave
>
> BTW - Can you get the link light on the front of the box to come on?? I can
by
> going into the F10 setup. The light will turn on, but as soon as you reboot
it
> will turn off again. Beats the hell out of me. If anyone knows let me know.
> Thanks
>
> Lee Sharp wrote:
>
> > John Sinnott wrote in message <7csvlt$iap$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
> > |Has anyone managed to get Linux up and running on the ProLiant 1850R? I
> > |know it is possible, since Compaq is now shipping these boxes configured
> > |for Linux. The only problem I am having is getting the embedded 10/100
> > |UTP NIC that comes with the box working. Is there a compatible driver
> > |available, or do I need to just purchase another NIC for one of the PCI
> > |slots?
> >
> > I believe the 1850R also ships with the TLAN <TI ThunderLAN> on the 850R.
> > A DejaNews search will show a multitude of posts soundly cursing that chip.
> > You need to do an "insmod tlan duplex=2" and run netconfig after install, if
> > you have that chip. Look in the box to be sure, as they changed in the
> > production run to an Intel Fats Ether Card at one point.
> >
> > Lee
> >
> > --
> > SCSI is *NOT* magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is
> > necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. *
> > Black holes are where God divided by zero. - I am speaking as an individual,
> > not as a representative of any company, organization or other entity. I am
> > solely responsible for my words.
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.rpm,redhat.rpm.general
Subject: RPM Errors on installing GNOME.
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:52:24 GMT
I am running RH5.1 on a Wintel PC. I am trying to install the GNOME
desktop manager. I have the relevant rpm files as detailed at www.gnome.org.
On installation, I am encountering errors. I am logged in as 'root'. I have
attempted installation using both of "rpm -Uvvh *.rpm" and "rpm -ivvh *.rpm".
My feeling is that the problem is due to my lack of knowledge of rpm.
Here is a typical example:
D: Header + Archive: 98136
D: Expected size: 569988
error: enlightenment-0.15.3-5.i386.rpm
Q1. Should the above two numbers match?
Q2. If so, why do they not match?
Q3. What should be my next course of action?
Any help offered will be gratefully received.
Steve.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.lang.c,gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: #include <math.h> - problem
Date: 29 Mar 1999 18:49:11 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Summit) writes:
> [I've crossposted this followup -- beware!]
>
> In article <7dip9p$vf5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I'm learning C on a Linux system with gcc 2.7...
> > When I try to calculate sin (x) the compiler says:
> > undefined reference to 'sin'
> > although I wrote
> > #include <math.h>
> > at the beginning.
>
> Bjoern: you need to use the -lm flag at the end of the command
> line when compiling. You might also want to get ahold of a copy
> of the comp.lang.c FAQ list. It answers this question of yours
> (question 14.3), so it just might answer your next question, too.
>
> Linux and gcc folks: I know I've asked this before, but why can't
> this be fixed in glibc? In 1978 on the PDP-11, there might have
> been good reason to leave the math functions out of libc.a, but
> surely we could afford to place them there today, especially
> since the ANSI C standard says they're just as standard as the
> rest of the standard library functions. As it is, gcc+glibc
> (and therefore C under Linux) is unnecessarily noncompliant,
> unless you argue that "gcc ... -lm" is the standard invocation.
I agree. I accept that "gcc ... -lm" *is* the standard but we've
rolled "nls", "socket", "resolv" and so on into "c" why not "m" too?
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:14:46 -0500
From: Gary Portnoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't compile kernel
St�phane Huguet wrote:
> I'm a little new to Linux;actually on rh5.2 - kernel 2.0.34 -I've tried
> compiling kernel 2.0.36, 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 : always the same error in make
> dep : the mkdep script can't find the included files (stdio.h...) - Does
> anyone have an idea on why these files have disappeared, and how to
> recover them ?
> Thanks in advance !
You need to install the glibc-devel rpm. Look on the CD.
-Gary-
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jedi)
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.setup,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,micorosft.public.outlook
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:05:35 -0800
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 17:51:02 +0300, Alexander I. Butenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I finally explain that I mean that it's ANYWAY more easier to install NT
>than Linux for a novice user.
...not for any task that has it's complexity 'built in'
regardless of GUI (or not).
>David Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:7dn8fq$ntm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> In article <#H7f6dVe#GA.267@cppssbbsa03>,
>> "Alexander I. Butenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Well,, I'd beter think that there is a Server for the client, not
>> > vice-versa. And one more - the question was about the OS for the home.
>MOst
>> > hom eusers can't even properly configure Win98, so the most correct
>answer
>> > about the Server was not linux but WIndows NT. Anyway I do not wasn to
>> > continue this flame as most of this group members seem to gain nothing
>from
>> > it.
>>
>> If most people can't even set up win98 at home, what hope have they with
>NT?
>>
>> If you want to see how easy it is to set up a home network, with IP
>> masquerading, firewalls etc. I would reccommend John Sery's book 'Linux
>> Network Toolkit' (IDG) which comes with all the software you need to get
>it
>> going. Starts off with simple networks and works up to workgroup size
>complex
>> ones.
>>
>> ..d
>
--
"I was not elected to watch my people suffer and die |||
while you discuss this a invasion in committe." / | \
In search of sane PPP docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com
------------------------------
From: Mykool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Weird Netscape Question
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:25:37 -0500
All of a sudden when I start netscape (ver 4.51), a page comes up. You
might say, that's not weird thats normal. No, I have it set to open up
with a blank page. I've changed it to open a specific page and I get
the same thing. It keeps opening one of freshmeat's ftp pages. I've
gone as far as deleting netscape and my .netscape and restarting from
scratch. Can anyone help me? Thanks.
--
Michael Barnhill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte294f
ICQ 13526262
------------------------------
From: Larry Blumette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OS support for Proc Temps?
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:10:42 -0500
Maybe this has been brought up before. I appologize if so.
Is there built in support for monitoring the processor temperatures and fan
speeds in Linux? If so how do you enable it? Does this have anything to do with
DPMI in the BIOS?
My dual P-Pro system (PR440FX) supports these functions but I am unsure as to
how to use them.
Thanks for your help in advance and sorry about all the questions. I'm new to
this arena.
-larry
------------------------------
From: Edwin van Geelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: I can't get my SB16 to work (2.0.35 and 2.2.1)
Date: 29 Mar 1999 12:45:53 GMT
Hi,
I can't get my Soundblaster 16 to work. I've tried it with kerbel 2.0.35,
which didn't work (couldn't find /dev/audio, although I'd switched the option
on) and now with kernel 2.2.1 it doesn't work either.
For the parameters, I queried Windows NT diagnostics, which gave met IRQ 10,
DMA 1 and I/O address 0x220. Windows doesn't say anything about the MTU
address or second DMA channel (nor does my Soundblaster manual), which I set
respectively to 0x300 and 5.
Kernel 2.2.1 doesn't seem to have an option for the /dev/audio device anymore,
so I can't set that.
Does anyone have any experience with this? Are there other configuration files
to consider (I didn't find anything in any HOWTO's)?
Thanks,
Edwin
------------------------------
From: "Michael Faurot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ?Corel Netwinder prices?
Date: 29 Mar 1999 07:13:29 GMT
Rod Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I didn't save the pricing pages I saw, but I do recall that all the
: models I checked out were over $1000, mostly in the $1500-$2000
: range. Equivalent x86 PCs would probably go for about $200-$700
: less. I'm pretty sure these were all US dollars, but if they were
: Canadian dollars, it would make the Netwinder much more economically
: competitive.
Is it just me, or does anyone else think these things are silly at
this price? For that matter, is everyone too busy thinking, "Gee,
this is neat, something else that can run Linux" to realize this is
just expensive proprietary hardware hiding underneath Linux (and a
somewhat proprietary distribution of Linux at that)?
If these things were about half the cost of a low-end PC, I could see
the attraction, but at these prices I can't see where there's a market
for these things in either the consumer or business sectors.
With a PC you can get replacement parts just about anywhere at commodity
prices and use any of the various x86 distributions of Linux. With these
Netwinders you'll be stuck with having to go back to the manufacturer
for parts as well to get updates to the Linux distribution.
--
==============================================================================
Michael | mfaurot | "I'm in Pittsburgh. Why am I here?"
Faurot | phzzzt.atww.org | -- Harold Urey, Nobel Laureate
------------------------------
From: Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: GL Quake + 3DFX card. Slooowwww.
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 20:01:40 +0100
Reply-To: Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I've just got GL Quake to work with RH 5.2 but the speed is rubbish. My
3DFX card is a Voodoo Graphics Diamond Monster 3D. The same game under
Win95 is much faster. The only difference I can see is that when
loading, GL Quake under linux says the GL Vendor is Mesa and under Win95
it says Voodoo. Any ideas why it's so slow?
--
Paul Richards (aka. Pauldoo)
EMAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTTP www.dunvegan1.demon.co.uk/paul/
ICQ# 14106503
=================================
Where do you want to crash today?
------------------------------
From: Frampton Steve R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Migrated to 2.2.x, but "issues" remain
Date: 28 Mar 1999 17:53:13 GMT
Hello:
I've finally made the jump to kernel 2.2.x, using the RPM's available on
the linux-mandrake site. I seem to be having a few little problems,
however, and I was hoping someone on this list may have seen and solved
similar ones when migrating to the latest kernels. They are:
- Upon booting the (custom-built) kernel, the system gets to "Checking
module dependancies" and then hangs. I tried deleting the module-info
file that was in the /boot directory, but to no avail. Fortunately, I
can press ctrl-c here and the boot process continues. *Why* is this
happening, and is it possible to build a new module-info file?
- The boot process whines about possibly insecure privs on my /dev/hdb4
swap partition, suggesting I chmod it to a different value. Er...I've
never chmod'ed a block device before! How is that possible??
- Once the boot process completes (with a few "OK" messages and a few
"FAILED" messages -- caused, I'm assuming, by my aborting the module
dependency checking), the only partition that is mounted is my '/' one.
I have to mount the others by hand, even though my /etc/fstab file is
intact.
- None of the scripts in /etc/rc.d/init.d have run. It is necessary for
me to execute them manually, and then execute /etc/rc.d/rc.local after.
This obviously is related to the mounting problems above.
I'm sure there'll be other questions but hopefully I can get these ones
resolved without too much difficulty. Any advice appreciated!
==============< LINUX: The choice of a GNU generation. >==============
Steve Frampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://qlink.queensu.ca/~3srf
------------------------------
From: ckchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: ICQ auf Linux
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 18:28:07 +0800
micq too
Matthias Warkus wrote:
> It was the 29 Mar 1999 15:39:38 +0200...
> ..and Desmond Coughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Josh Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I'm not sure what you are asking, but I have a feeling this will help :-)
> > >
> > > Do a search on www.freshmeat.net for Licq
> > >
> > > Licq is an ICQ client that runs great in linux. There's also a bunch of others
>there you can find by
> > > just searching for ICQ. The Java version just sucks, I wouldn't suggest anyone
>use it.
> >
> > Just wondering : is there a Linux ICQ that doesn't need to X ?
>
> Yes, zicq and a couple others.
>
> mawa
> --
> Q: How does a spoilt rich girl change a light bulb?
> A: She says, "Daddy, I want a new apartment."
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
