Linux-Misc Digest #698, Volume #20 Sat, 19 Jun 99 15:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: linux on 386 (William Burrow)
New to mutt: problem (Tom Shannon)
Re: Netscape problem w/Apache (Joachim Feise)
Re: NT the best web platform? (William Burrow)
Re: A Capitalists view of freedom (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: Best sound card for use w/ Linux? ("Juztice")
Re: Possible to mount Samba filesys (smbfs) via ordinary 'mount' command? (Rod Smith)
Microcom motem problem with kernel 2.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Red-Hat - Linux? (Timothy Murphy)
bash feature in ksh (Robert Chung)
Re: How can I get screen capture images of installation? (goodman)
Possible to mount Samba filesys (smbfs) via ordinary 'mount' command? (Kenny
McCormack)
compiling gnome question (F. Heitkamp)
Linux + RAM >64M (Thomas Ruedas)
Debian advocates (Salman Ahmed)
Re: bash feature in ksh (Dave Brown)
Re: [help] Could not execute Perl script (Scott Lanning)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest
News (Jeff Szarka)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft Retest
News (Ken Williams)
Need help with 3d Blaster Banshee ("Defra")
Re: How do I create a custom (Menuing) Shell? (NF Stevens)
Re: [help] Could not execute Perl script (Matthew Bafford)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Burrow)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: linux on 386
Date: 19 Jun 1999 16:13:21 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 Jun 1999 14:38:33 GMT,
Stefano Ghirlanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I happen to have an 386 with which I would like to do something useful,
>but mostly play with :-)
A 386 would be fun for that. With typical distributions, you might need
as much as 8 megs on board, but with some trickery, you can shoehorn
Slackware on there with only 4 megs RAM and as small as 40 megs disk.
>My plan is to use it as a loghost for a small network (5-6 machines) so
>that it should only allow syslogd or simlar connections and from these
>machines only. There doesn't need to be any X or fancy stuff or even user
>programs beyond what's needed to examine the logfiles.
You might want to have lots of disk then, and possibly look for the
compressed ext2 filesystem as well -- logs compress real well.
--
William Burrow -- New Brunswick, Canada o
Copyright 1999 William Burrow ~ /\
~ ()>()
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Shannon)
Subject: New to mutt: problem
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 12:15:45 -04-59
I am evaluating mutt with an eye toward switching to it from pine. I
like some of the features like scoring. I also like the fact that
most commands can be carried out by hitting one key. Both of these
features make it very much like slrn (for news reading). Very
functional.
Unfortunately, when I send mail, its getting sent back with the
message "Sender must exist". The From: header is correct
(i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]). However, the Sender: is apparently
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've never had this problem with the half-dozen or so mailers I've
tried in the past. Is there a good way to solve this? I'd rather not
have to edit the sendmail.cf unless absolutely necessary.
I am using a standard Red Hat 6.0 install with DHCP. The server
assigns both an IP number and a host name to go with it.
By the way, I don't consider myself a novice at editing rcfiles, but I
don't think I've ever seen a program that needs a configuration/setup
screen more than this one.
Tom
------------------------------
From: Joachim Feise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.linux.sux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Netscape problem w/Apache
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 09:48:36 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems that your index.html is sent over with the MIME type text/plain
instead of text/html. I remember seeing this when the filename was index.htm and
the configuration file was not set up to use text/html for .htm files.
Netscape's behavior in this case would actually be correct, IE apparently looks at
the content and decides it is html. In addition, IE usually uses HTTP 1.1, while
Netscape uses 1.0.
There is a way to test this, with telnet:
telnet to port 80 on your server, and then type:
GET / HTTP/1.0
Host: hostname of your server
Don't forget an additional empty line at the end.
Now, if this turns out to be the problem, how to fix it? Probably somewhere in
the Apache configuration. But where, I have no idea.
-Joe
Brent Davies wrote:
:
: I really appreciate all of the advice for HTML editors, and I will look into
: them, but my problem with Apache/Netscape still remains.
:
: I am conversing with someone over email, and he asked me to more fully
: describe the problem. I tried to, and I'm copying that text into this
: posting.
:
: Pasted text:
: I have multiple web sites on one server. I am using the VirtualHost
: directive in httpd.conf to accomplish this. This problem exists on
: some, but not all, of the virtual sites. The file srm.conf is correctly
: configured so that the DirectoryIndex files are index.html, index.htm,
: index.shtml, index.cgi. Ok, as for the Apache configuration, that is all
: the relevant info that I can think of. If there's something in Apache that
: you need me to tell you, ask and I'll reply.
:
: Now, when I open Internet Explorer on a Windows machine and attach to the
: web site, it works great. When I open Netscape Navigator on a Win box and
: hit the web site, I get source code. The interesting thing about it is that
: the source code is from the correct index.html page. That would tell me
: that Netscape made a request to access the web site, Apache said, "what URL
: are you looking for", Netscape replied, Apache said, "Ok, you did not
: specifiy a document name, so my srm.conf file says that I should look for
: index.html first. Ah, here it is, Apache passed the file to Netscape.
: Perfect. So why does Netscape display it as source code and not
: graphical!?! It's a little frustrating, though I'm not blaming you.
:
: Anyway, that is about as much detail as I can think of. I'm sure that I
: forgot something. If you want anything more, let me know.
:
: Thanks,
: -B
--
===================================================================
Joachim Feise Ph.D. Student, Information & Computer Science
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===================================================================
Windows 95/NT - 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit
patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit
microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company that can't stand 1 bit
of competition.
Found at: http://www.ugu.com/sui/ugu/show?I=windows&F=1111111111&G=Y
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Burrow)
Crossposted-To: comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: NT the best web platform?
Date: 19 Jun 1999 16:29:14 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 03:21:59 -0300,
Scott MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A My Cdrom can read 24X on the inner section of the disk and 12X on the
>outer. I don't see how hard drives wouldn't be the same. 2.7X faster could
>be created by this fact. I don't belive this was the only factor though.
You are confused. For a constant angular velocity (RPM), the outer
tracks have a higher linear velocity (are faster) than the inner tracks.
If you don't believe this, find an old phonograph (maybe your
grandparents have one) and experiment with small objects on the driving
surface. Or use a bicycle wheel and mark 1cm (1/2") marks on the hub
and the rim.
Most modern hard drives make the most use of the platter by using
uniform bit density (zoned bit recording). CDs are (were) constant
linear velocity drives, so have uniform spacing and higher data rates on
the outer section when driven at constant angular velocity as they are
now (on computers).
--
William Burrow -- New Brunswick, Canada o
Copyright 1999 William Burrow ~ /\
~ ()>()
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: A Capitalists view of freedom
Date: 19 Jun 1999 17:21:21 GMT
On 18 Jun 1999 19:55:59 -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi) writes:
>> (a) power has *not* become "centralised". In any place with a credible
>> democratic elction process, the people are ultimately the decision
>> makers.
>
>the united states seems quite a bit more centralized than it was in
>the 19 century.
I suspect that this has more to do with technology than Military power.
Even the British, French and (earlier) Roman/Greek empires didn't acheive
any effective centraliation, due to technological limitations of their era.
>really onerous. however, we do have more government. the income tax
>(not saying it is evil) is a manifestation of the greater power which
yes, but one could argue that there is not *more* government as a result of the
absence of weapon proliferation. Again, we are stuck with an (isolated)
correlation and no clear conclusion about causality, in that when a society is
in a state of anarchy, there is a more obvious need to own weapons, since the
law enforcement agencies are ineffective ( or nonexistant )
>> (b) distributing "power" between a group of opposing militias is a
>> step towards bringing a country towards civil warfare.
>
>only if offense is more powerful than defense.
could you elaborate ?
--
Donovan
------------------------------
From: "Juztice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Best sound card for use w/ Linux?
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 00:17:20 +0800
hmm... maybe the next release of opensound will support sb live... then get
sb live.
Deryk Barker wrote in message <7kcdqo$erp$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>David Fox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi) writes:
>:
>: > On Wed, 16 Jun 1999 04:49:03 GMT, Gravot wrote:
>: > >prefaced with a "win"? I am especially curious about sound cards. Is
>: > >there any one card that is more suitable than the rest? If so, what is
>: > >the reasoning? Any favorites?
>: >
>: > Creative labs ISA cards are a snap to set up on linux. And you get to
put a
>: > useless ISA slot to use (-;
>:
>: But they don't sound particularly good (music-wise) if that is
>: something you are concerned about.
>
>I'm glad you mention that, because I'm looking to get a sound card
>that will allow me to digitize analogue signals (e.e. tapes) so that I
>can put them onto CD.
>
>Anyone recommend a card with decent sounding *input* facilities too?
>
>--
>|Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept. | Music does not have to be
understood|
>|Camosun College, Victoria, BC, Canada| It has to be listened to.
|
>|email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|
>|phone: +1 250 370 4452 | Hermann Scherchen.
|
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Possible to mount Samba filesys (smbfs) via ordinary 'mount' command?
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:08:43 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Posted and mailed]
In article <7kghgn$q72$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenny McCormack) writes:
> I have Samba working fine and can mount drives on my 9x/NT boxes from
> Linux using smbmount. However, it would be nice if it could be done
> using ordinary 'mount', using the normal mount syntax - and,
> eventually, to be done via entries in the /etc/fstab file.
I've been casually looking for something like this for some time, with no
luck. I did recently run across the following in the smbmount man page:
: To mount an smb file system, I suggest using the option -c
: for smbmount to pass the mount command. For example, use
: smbmount "\\server\tmp" -c 'mount /mnt -u 123 -g 456'
: to mount the tmp share of server on /mnt
This did work for me. I've not yet tried to combine this with user
permissions in the /etc/fstab file to see if this might allow normal users
to do it. Perhaps a suid root script could do it, though....
--
Rod Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith
NOTE: Remove the "uce" word from my address to mail me
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Microcom motem problem with kernel 2.2
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 15:45:25 GMT
Previously I had no problem with the modem using network manager
or kppp to connect to internet.
Now that I upgraded to RH6.0 (from 5.2) I cant get connectet at correct
speed.
I have always had the speed set to 57000 bps, and the modem still
connected in 33600 bps. Now after the upgrate the modem connection is
terrible slow, about 200bytes/sec.
Can it be that the new kernel have a problem with my microcom deskporte
S modem, or are all modems treated the same way ?
Has anyone had this problem, and know of a solution ?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Murphy)
Subject: Re: Red-Hat - Linux?
Date: 19 Jun 1999 17:39:03 +0100
Tom Alsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>why do so many people say Red Hat is /not/ really Linux?
I never heard anyone say that.
In any case, it is a very silly remark.
Ignore it.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Chung)
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.admin,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: bash feature in ksh
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:22:10 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Somehow typing partial file name and then typing TAB key automatically
prints full file name in bash but not in ksh. For example, typing
".prof" and TAB prints out ".profile" in bash. I am wondering what
switch turns this on in bash, and if it is possible to do the same in
ksh. Thank you in advance.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 11:03:20 +0900
From: goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How can I get screen capture images of installation?
nlucent wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Linuxers.
> >
> > I have installed Red Hat Linux 5.2 on my sistem. I need snapshot
> images
> >
> > of install screens.
> > During installation, no capture utilities can be loaded.
> > How can I get screen capture images of installation?
> >
> > Please help me.
> > Thank you for answer in advance.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> You could try installing it in vmware, then take screen shots of that.
> www.vmware.com
>
> Nick
> --
> The opinions expressed are my own, and are not
> necessarily endorsed or shared by my employer.
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Thank you , Problem solved!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenny McCormack)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Possible to mount Samba filesys (smbfs) via ordinary 'mount' command?
Date: 19 Jun 1999 11:46:15 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have Samba working fine and can mount drives on my 9x/NT boxes from
Linux using smbmount. However, it would be nice if it could be done
using ordinary 'mount', using the normal mount syntax - and,
eventually, to be done via entries in the /etc/fstab file.
Is this possible?
"man mount" says this on the subject:
Mount options for smbfs
Just like nfs, the smb implementation expects a binary
argument (a struct smb_mount_data) to the mount system
call. This argument is constructed by smbmount(8) and the
current version of mount (2.6c) does not know anything
about smb.
.... which seems to say, "You're on your own in getting this to work".
I can do: smbmount //machine/service /mnt -U someuser -I machine
but when I do: mount -t smbfs //machine/service /mnt
it doesn't work. The question is: How to pass those other args to
mount that smbmount needs?
Please help...
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (F. Heitkamp)
Subject: compiling gnome question
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 19 Jun 1999 17:56:01 GMT
I've been compiling Gnome from the CVS trees and I have a
couple questions. I've noticed that some of the packages
look for db2html. I've found a script called that somewhere
that seems to work. It in turn calls a program called jade,
that I also seemed to find, along with some other tool kit
called sp. What I want to know is where the required tools
are and what they are actually called. Is the db2html from
some package? Is there a way to find out what the names of
all the packages available from the CVS server are called?
I've been able to get some of them by trial and error, but
it would be nice if there was a list.
Fred
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 20:16:43 +0200
From: Thomas Ruedas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux + RAM >64M
A colleague of mine wants to get a new computer with 128MB RAM and needs
to know if there is a problem for Linux to address more than 64M. I seem
to remember having read that it is necessary to recompile the kernel
after an appropriate change if one wants to run Linux with more 64M, but
I'm not sure and I didn't find a reference to the problem now.
Any comments? The colleague has one of the newest Red hat releases.
Thanks,
--
============================================
Thomas Ruedas
Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics,
J.W. Goethe University Frankfurt/Main
Feldbergstrasse 47 D-60323 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Phone:+49-(0)69-798-24949 Fax:+49-(0)69-798-23280
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geophysik.uni-frankfurt.de/~ruedas/
============================================
------------------------------
From: Salman Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.debian.user,alt.os.linux
Subject: Debian advocates
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:20:39 -0400
I am currently using RedHat 5.2 (kernel 2.0.36) and now want to make
a switch to another distro. After comparing all the distros, it seems that
Debian fits the bill for me.
I'd like to get some more information from Debian users before I make
the switch :
(1) Is there a version of Debian that comes with a 2.2.x kernel ? The
Debian website says that 2.1 comes with the 2.0.36 kernel and I do
want to make the switch to a 2.2.x kernel.
(2) How easy is it with Debian to upgrade from the 2.0.36 kernel to
one of the 2.2.x kernels ? I have avoided so far trying to upgrade my
RH 5.2 kernel 2.0.36 to one of the 2.2.x ones because of horror stories
from other people about problems with glibc 2.1 and the new egcs.
(3) When is the next stable release of Debian going to be released ?
(4) What does Debian offer to the power user over a distro like say
RH ?
I would really like to hear people's positive and negative experiences with
Debian, and also arguments in favor of switching to Debian.
My system configuration is :
Celeron 300A (at 300MHz)
128 MB Ram
Quantum 10.2 UDMA HD
Creative Labs 36x CD-ROM
SoundBlaster PCI 128 sound card
Acer 56k internal ISA modem
Matrox Millenium G200 video card
ADI MicroScan 6P monitor
Will the hw mentioned above pose a problem for Debian ?
Thanks for any information.
--
Salman S. Ahmed
ssahmed AT interlog DOT com
Remove the "nospam." portion from my email address
to reply to this message.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Brown)
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.admin,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: bash feature in ksh
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 19 Jun 99 17:55:12 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Chung wrote:
>
>Somehow typing partial file name and then typing TAB key automatically
>prints full file name in bash but not in ksh. For example, typing
>".prof" and TAB prints out ".profile" in bash. I am wondering what
>switch turns this on in bash, and if it is possible to do the same in
>ksh. Thank you in advance.
>
The Korn shell implements this (somewhat less conveniently) if you have
command-line editing feature turned on, i.e. "set -o vi". To
do file-name completion, hit the <Esc> key, then the "\" key.
--
Dave Brown Austin, TX
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Lanning)
Subject: Re: [help] Could not execute Perl script
Date: 19 Jun 1999 17:27:05 GMT
Vu N Dang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: [Sat Jun 19 07:31:24 1999] [error] [client 215.173.45.31] (2)No such
: file or directory: exec of /home/httpd/cgi-bin/setup.cgi failed
: I already change the permission of all the .cgi to 755
: Notice: if the setup.cgi is the output of the compiling a .c file
: then it is just okey. It failed if setup.cgi is a perl script only.
What's the first line of your perl script, and where's your perl
interpreter (`which perl`)? Maybe you have
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
when it should be
#!/usr/bin/perl
or something like that.
Also, make sure you have the '#!' part right; it's easy to make
a typo.
--
Scott Lanning: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://physics.bu.edu/~slanning
"It showed a lady, with a fur cap on and a fur stole, sitting upright
and holding out to the spectator a huge fur muff into which the whole
of her forearm had vanished!" --From Franz Kafka's Metamorphosis
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Szarka)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft
Retest News
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:15:55 GMT
On 19 Jun 1999 16:34:59 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Lee) wrote:
:>Wow, this was a beautiful piece of FUD I missed.
:
:
:What FUD? How do you think BO got to be so popular with the Windows set?
Because morons on IRC and usenet opened up attachments thinking "gee,
this is gonna be neato". I have never used a mail/news program tat
opened attachments automatically (except JPEG's that they view inline)
Show me some proof OE does that....
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Williams)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: Mindcraft
Retest News
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:22:13 GMT
In article <6EGa3.299$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Scott MacDonald"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Open source code and
>> > 20 years of release time have been helpful. Meanwhile, Windows and NT
>> > have been used for networking for but a few years and it's pretty clear
>> > that this is going to continue for quite some time. MS won't get sued
>> > over it, they'll make a killing selling fixes instead. Or perhaps
>people
>> > will start to realize the costs and move on.
>>
>> They don't sell fixes - they are free.
>>
>Win 98 was a fix for Win95 don't try to tell me they don't sell them.
Wrong, 98's sole purpose on earth is to force IE4/5 upon every user possible.
IE is the most important peice of software ms has right now. The fact that MS
was able to bloat 98 up some more to make people buy faster machines(typical
purchase cycle) was just a bonus. I don't think they cared about the money on
this one. Not at all.
------------------------------
From: "Defra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Need help with 3d Blaster Banshee
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:19:54 +0200
I've got a 3d Blaster Banshee under linux but it doesn't work. Can anybody
help me?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (write by mail please)
Thanks
Good work with Linux!!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NF Stevens)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: How do I create a custom (Menuing) Shell?
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:38:14 GMT
"John Rappold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Our VMS system allows lets certain groups of users telnet into a custom
>shell that has a menuing system....they can cursor to items to start an app
>or press a number.
>
>Can someone point me in the right direction on how to setup something like
>this in Linux? I'm a newbie.
>
Set the default shell for the user, either by using chsh or by
editing /etc/passwd directly.
Norman
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Bafford)
Subject: Re: [help] Could not execute Perl script
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:07:55 GMT
Once upon a time (19 Jun 1999 11:55:32 GMT), Vu N Dang was attempting to
figure out Ilya's new Perl regex features, and accidently sent the
following to comp.os.linux.misc:
: [Sat Jun 19 07:31:24 1999] [error] [client 215.173.45.31] (2)No such
: file or directory: exec of /home/httpd/cgi-bin/setup.cgi failed
: [Sat Jun 19 07:31:24 1999] [error] [client 215.173.45.31] Premature
: end of script deaders: /home/httpd/cgi-bin/setup.cgi
: I already change the permission of all the .cgi to 755
Check the shebang line.
: Thank you very much in advance
HTH,
: VD.
--Matthew
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
