On Wednesday 25 May 2011, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> Instead of sharing sdhci-pxa.c, use sdhci-mmp2.c specificlly for mmp2.
> sdhci-pxa.c is used to share among pxa serious, like pxa910, mmp2, etc.
> The platfrom difference are put under arch/arm, while is not easy to
> track.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-pxa/include/plat/sdhci.h | 43 ++++-
> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 11 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-mmp2.c | 303
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxa.c | 303
> --------------------------------
> 5 files changed, 349 insertions(+), 313 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-mmp2.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxa.c
Yes, looks good for the most part. I was rather confused by the fact that the
old
and new file are both 303 lines, so I assumed they would be identical, when they
are really completely different.
There is a little room for simplification, I think:
> +static unsigned int mmp2_get_ro(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + /* Micro SD does not support write-protect feature */
> + return 0;
> +}
You shouldn't need to provide an empty get_ro function, the
default is that there is no write-protect.
> +static void mmp2_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct sdhci_pxa *pxa = pltfm_host->priv;
> +
> + if (clock)
> + mmp2_soc_set_timing(host, pxa->pdata);
> +}
The mmp2_soc_set_timing() function is only called here, so you can easily
merge the two into one, starting with
if (!clock)
return;
> +static int __devinit sdhci_mmp2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
> + struct sdhci_pxa_platdata *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct sdhci_host *host = NULL;
> + struct sdhci_pxa *pxa = NULL;
> + int ret;
> + struct clk *clk;
The probe and release functions for mmp2 and pxa910 are almost identical.
I'd suggest you leave them in sdhci-pxa.c as a library, and export them
using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Then you can call them from the respective
probe functions, e.g.
static struct sdhci_mmp2_ops = {
.set_clock = mmp2_set_clock,
.set_uhs_signaling = mmp2_set_uhs_signaling,
.get_ro = mmp2_get_ro,
};
static int __devinit sdhci_mmp2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
unsigned int quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_ADMA
| SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL
| SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR
| SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_SIZE
| SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_ADMA_SIZE
| SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_ENDATTR_IN_NOPDESC;
return sdhci_pxa_probe(pdev, quirks, sdhci_mmp2_ops);
}
> + pxa = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sdhci_pxa), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pxa) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + pxa->ops = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sdhci_ops), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pxa->ops) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
I think you really shouldn't allocate the sdhci_ops dynamically.
In fact, it would be much better if we were able to mark them
as const in all drivers.
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int sdhci_mmp2_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t
> state)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + return sdhci_suspend_host(host, state);
> +}
> +
> +static int sdhci_mmp2_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + return sdhci_resume_host(host);
> +}
> +#else
> +#define sdhci_mmp2_suspend NULL
> +#define sdhci_mmp2_resume NULL
> +#endif
Similarly, I think it would be good if sdhci-pltfm.c would simply
export these functions so you could refer to them in your driver.
There is no need to have identical copies in each variant.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
