Hi,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:39:32PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 08-07-2011 1:33, Ido Yariv wrote:
>
> >The DA850 supports an optional wl12xx based expansion board, adding WLAN
> >& BT capabilities. The wl12xx is a 4-wire, 1.8V, embedded SDIO WLAN
> >device with an external IRQ line and is power-controlled by a GPIO-based
> >fixed regulator.
>
> >This patch adds support for the WLAN capabilities of this expansion
> >board.
>
> >Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv<[email protected]>
> >---
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig | 31 +++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 128
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 9 ++
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/mux.h | 10 +++
> > 4 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
> >index c0deaca..1a9149c 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
> >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
> >@@ -192,6 +192,37 @@ config DA850_UI_RMII
> >
> > endchoice
> >
> >+config DA850_WL12XX
> >+ bool "DA850 wl12xx expansion board"
> >+ depends on MACH_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM
> >+ ---help---
> >+ Say Y if you want to use a wl12xx expansion board connected to the
> >+ DA850 EVM.
>
> If I don't mistake, this expansion board is rather used with AM180x EVM?
I'm actually not sure about the compatibility between the two, so yes,
it might be a good idea to rename the configuration option and
description.
[...]
> >+config DA850_WL12XX_FREF_19_2
> >+ bool "19.2MHz"
> >+config DA850_WL12XX_FREF_26
> >+ bool "26MHz"
> >+config DA850_WL12XX_FREF_38_4
> >+ bool "38.4MHz"
> >+config DA850_WL12XX_FREF_52
> >+ bool "52MHz"
> >+config DA850_WL12XX_FREF_XTAL_26
> >+ bool "XTAL 26MHz"
> >+config DA850_WL12XX_FREF_XTAL_38_4
> >+ bool "XTAL 38MHz"
>
> Could you add emoty lines between items?
Sure.
[...]
> >+static int da850_wl12xx_fref = -1;
> >+
> >+static int __init setup_da850_wl12xx_fref(char *fref)
> >+{
> >+ if (!strcmp(fref, "19.2"))
> >+ da850_wl12xx_fref = WL12XX_REFCLOCK_19;
> >+ else if (!strcmp(fref, "26"))
> >+ da850_wl12xx_fref = WL12XX_REFCLOCK_26;
> >+ else if (!strcmp(fref, "38.4"))
> >+ da850_wl12xx_fref = WL12XX_REFCLOCK_38;
> >+ else if (!strcmp(fref, "52"))
> >+ da850_wl12xx_fref = WL12XX_REFCLOCK_52;
> >+ else if (!strcmp(fref, "XTAL26"))
> >+ da850_wl12xx_fref = WL12XX_REFCLOCK_26_XTAL;
> >+ else if (!strcmp(fref, "XTAL38.4"))
> >+ da850_wl12xx_fref = WL12XX_REFCLOCK_38_XTAL;
> >+ else
> >+ pr_info("da850_wl12xx_fref is invalid. Valid options: "
> >+ "19.2, 26, 38.4, 52, XTAL26 or XTAL38.4\n");
> >+ return 0;
> >+}
> >+__setup("da850_wl12xx_fref=", setup_da850_wl12xx_fref);
>
> Why then also have a Kconfig 'choice' for that?
We could choose a default value arbitrarily, but AFAIK there isn't a
good one. The two currently available expansion boards use different
reference clocks, so one of them will not work out of the box.
Having it configurable by a boot argument can be handy when switching
between expansion boards during development. Naturally, it's not a must.
> >+static void wl12xx_set_power(int slot, bool power_on)
> >+{
> >+ static bool power_state;
> >+
> >+ pr_debug("Powering %s wl12xx", (power_on ? "on" : "off"));
>
> Parens not needed around ?:.
Sure, will be fixed.
>
> >+ if (power_on) {
> >+ /* Power up sequence required for wl127x devices */
> >+ gpio_set_value(DA850_WLAN_EN, 1);
> >+ mdelay(15);
> >+ gpio_set_value(DA850_WLAN_EN, 0);
> >+ mdelay(1);
> >+ gpio_set_value(DA850_WLAN_EN, 1);
> >+ mdelay(70);
>
> Perhaps msleep()?
Sure, will be fixed.
> >+static void da850_wl12xx_init(void)
> >+{
> >+ int ret;
> >+
> >+ ret = davinci_cfg_reg_list(da850_evm_mmc_wl12xx_pins);
> >+ if (ret)
> >+ pr_warning("da850_evm_init: wl12xx/mmc mux setup failed:"
> >+ " %d\n", ret);
> >+
> >+ ret = da850_register_mmcsd1(&da850_mmc_wl12xx_config);
> >+ if (ret)
> >+ pr_warning("da850_evm_init: wl12xx/mmc registration failed:"
> >+ " %d\n", ret);
>
> If these fail, does it makse sense to continue? I doubt it...
Right, will be fixed.
>
> >+ if (gpio_request(DA850_WLAN_EN, "wl12xx_en") ||
> >+ gpio_direction_output(DA850_WLAN_EN, 0))
>
> Use gpio_request_one() instead of this pair.
>
> >+ pr_err("Error initializing the wl12xx enable gpio\n");
> >+
> >+ if (gpio_request(DA850_WLAN_IRQ, "wl12xx_irq") ||
> >+ gpio_direction_input(DA850_WLAN_IRQ))
>
> Same here.
Sure, will be fixed.
> >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> >index 133aac4..bfe9b71 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> >@@ -525,6 +525,13 @@ static const struct mux_config da850_pins[] = {
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, MMCSD0_DAT_3, 10, 20, 15, 2, false)
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, MMCSD0_CLK, 10, 0, 15, 2, false)
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, MMCSD0_CMD, 10, 4, 15, 2, false)
> >+ /* MMC/SD1 function */
> >+ MUX_CFG(DA850, MMCSD1_DAT_0, 18, 8, 15, 2, false)
> >+ MUX_CFG(DA850, MMCSD1_DAT_1, 19, 16, 15, 2, false)
> >+ MUX_CFG(DA850, MMCSD1_DAT_2, 19, 12, 15, 2, false)
> >+ MUX_CFG(DA850, MMCSD1_DAT_3, 19, 8, 15, 2, false)
> >+ MUX_CFG(DA850, MMCSD1_CLK, 18, 12, 15, 2, false)
> >+ MUX_CFG(DA850, MMCSD1_CMD, 18, 16, 15, 2, false)
> > /* EMIF2.5/EMIFA function */
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, EMA_D_7, 9, 0, 15, 1, false)
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, EMA_D_6, 9, 4, 15, 1, false)
> >@@ -583,6 +590,8 @@ static const struct mux_config da850_pins[] = {
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, GPIO3_13, 7, 8, 15, 8, false)
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, GPIO4_0, 10, 28, 15, 8, false)
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, GPIO4_1, 10, 24, 15, 8, false)
> >+ MUX_CFG(DA850, GPIO6_9, 13, 24, 15, 8, false)
> >+ MUX_CFG(DA850, GPIO6_10, 13, 20, 15, 8, false)
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, GPIO6_13, 13, 8, 15, 8, false)
> > MUX_CFG(DA850, RTC_ALARM, 0, 28, 15, 2, false)
> > #endif
>
> >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/mux.h
> >b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/mux.h
> >index 5d4e0fe..a7e92fc 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/mux.h
> >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/mux.h
> >@@ -857,6 +857,14 @@ enum davinci_da850_index {
> > DA850_MMCSD0_CLK,
> > DA850_MMCSD0_CMD,
> >
> >+ /* MMC/SD1 function */
> >+ DA850_MMCSD1_DAT_0,
> >+ DA850_MMCSD1_DAT_1,
> >+ DA850_MMCSD1_DAT_2,
> >+ DA850_MMCSD1_DAT_3,
> >+ DA850_MMCSD1_CLK,
> >+ DA850_MMCSD1_CMD,
> >+
> > /* EMIF2.5/EMIFA function */
> > DA850_EMA_D_7,
> > DA850_EMA_D_6,
> >@@ -916,6 +924,8 @@ enum davinci_da850_index {
> > DA850_GPIO3_13,
> > DA850_GPIO4_0,
> > DA850_GPIO4_1,
> >+ DA850_GPIO6_9,
> >+ DA850_GPIO6_10,
> > DA850_GPIO6_13,
> > DA850_RTC_ALARM,
> > };
>
> Please modify these 2 files a sperate patch. Maybe even 2
> patches: one for MMC1 pins and one for GPIO pins...
Sure, will be fixed.
Thanks for your review,
Ido.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
