On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:

> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> >
> > A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
> > a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
> > of another device in the same power domain, may cause power to be
> > removed from the entire domain.  In that case, the amount of time
> > necessary to runtime-resume the given device (e.g. the MMC
> > controller) is often substantially greater than the time needed to
> > run its driver's runtime resume callback.  That may hurt performance
> > in some situations, because user data may need to wait for the
> > device to become operational, so we should make it possible to
> > prevent that from happening.
> >
> > For this reason, introduce a new sysfs attribute for devices,
> > power/pm_qos_latency_us, allowing user space to specify the upper
> 
> If we're expecting to have more of these knobs, maybe having a pm_qos
> subdir under power will keep down the clutter in /sys/devices/.../power.
> This knob would then be /sys/devices/.../power/pm_qos/pm_qos_latency_us.

If this change does have to be made, I'd propose

.../power/qos/latency...

removing redundancy.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to