On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Thierry Vignaud
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 19 September 2012 02:30, Lucas De Marchi
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Fixing this in hash implementation or hash comparison function is the
>>> wrong thing to do. As you noticed, the hash is used for other things
>>> too.
>>
>> I've just made a quick fix. Could you please send me your modules.order,
>> modules.alias, modules.dep together with the affected modules (only
>> the names are ok). Bonus points for you if you use this information to
>> actually create a test in the testsuite :-)
>
> Here they're.
> The module that we failed to detect properly was cciss.
> see https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5833

Sorry, I couldn't really test this. Did the patch I sent solve the issue?


Your modules.order seems to have been tweaked afterwards because it
contains the compressed module names. The patch I sent tries to solve
this by indexing the modules by their uncompressed names.

Lucas De Marchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to