Hello :
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes. CSZ core is pure classical WFQ, but it appeared so expensive
> that I decided to freeze it on stage of "prototype" implemenation.
> Tricky, nice code: it is not to work, but to look at 8)
First of all, I thank you for the response. But one thing I could not
understand is the term "prototype". Is it that the CSZ will not work even
if I enable it in the kernel !!! Or, if I am able to write an interface in
the 'tc', should that allow me to use CSZ properly ? (please excuse me if
I sound uneasy =) )
> Yes. They were planned but were not implemented, because of absence
> of time. Feel free to implement them. Seems, H-FSC really deserves attention.
I would surely want to try a hand on it. Any pointers to understand the
H-PFQ algorithm first ? ;-) (Thanks in advance for that).
>
> Alexey Kuznetsov
>
Regards,
Vinay.
" Some people complain because God put thorns on roses,
while others praise Him for putting roses among thorns."
-------------------------------------------------------------
Vinay V. Kulkarni
Project Assistant, ERNET, ECE Dept., IISc., Bangalore 560 012
Ph : +91-80-334 0855. Fax : +91-80-334 7991
-------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
