On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Dennis wrote:
> At 04:47 PM 9/7/99 -0400, Jeff Mcadams wrote:
> >Thus spake Dennis
> >>At 11:10 AM 9/7/99 +0000, you wrote:
> >>>I know bonding dial out asynch PPP is possible but can bonded DSL be
> >>>done ? (Not all DSL is close enough to a CO for high speeds, ergo 2
> >>>bonded low speed is desirable.)
> >>thats pretty funny. you are overselling your bandwidth by 20 times on
> >>DSL and then you want to bond channels to get 20% (instead of 10%) of
> >>the line speed!
> >Uhm...he was referencing distance from the CO for the speed limitations,
> >not oversell of bandwidth. Careful about jumping to conclusions.
> My point was is that he is not going to get anywhere near the line speed
> (regardless of what it is), so adding another load to the already
> overloaded wire will just worsen the load.
Your reply makes no sense at all. He's not adding another load to the same
wire. He's adding another circuit to another pair of wire.
You have some pretty weird preconceived notions about what DSL is or how
it works.
FWIW we are happy cranking 2mbps and 8mbps over DSL, no problem with
"load" (whatever you mean by that).
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]