Hello! > Which reminds me. > Let me know if this "cheap 63bit atomic increment" works... Well, it should work and it is fast enough. Only why to program in assembly, if you may get even 256 bit counters plus lots of another information including packet/data rates etc. with trivial daemonlet? Actually, 64 bit counters in ipchains are pretty useless redundancy too. Alexey Kuznetsov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- TcpPassiveOpens & /proc/net/dev (linux 2.2.12) Sami Farin
- Re: TcpPassiveOpens & /proc/net/dev (linux 2.2... Alan Cox
- fast 64 bit "atomic" x86 counters Jamie Lokier
- Re: fast 64 bit "atomic" x86 cou... kuznet
- Re: fast 64 bit "atomic" x86... Jamie Lokier
- Re: fast 64 bit "atomic"... kuznet
- Re: fast 64 bit "atomic"... Philip Blundell
- Re: fast 64 bit "atomic&... Jamie Lokier
- Re: fast 64 bit "atomic" x86... Paul Rusty Russell
