> Thank you very much for the timely help. Your solution did work, but the > doubt still remains why we should be giving 16384(or 16385bps) when > 128Kbps will result in 131072bps !!! 16384 is 128x128 !!! :) 128 = 1024 / 8 = 1K / 8 16384 is probably referring to bytes per second, instead of bits per second. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Prob. with TBF Vinay V.Kulkarni
- Re: Prob. with TBF Christoph Mause
- Re: Prob. with TBF Vinay V.Kulkarni
- Re: Prob. with TBF Rui Prior
- Re: Prob. with TBF Christoph Mause
- Re: Prob. with TBF Vinay V.Kulkarni
- Prob. with TBF Vinay V.Kulkarni
- Re: Prob. with TBF Christoph Mause
