> Thank you very much for the timely help. Your solution did work, but the
> doubt still remains why we should be giving 16384(or 16385bps) when
> 128Kbps will result in 131072bps !!! 16384 is 128x128 !!! :)

128 = 1024 / 8 = 1K / 8
16384 is probably referring to bytes per second, instead of bits per second.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to