On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Christoph Mause wrote:
> My interpretation of the problem with the peakrate is that it doesn't
> make much sense to allow a peakrate which is nearly the same as the rate
> you want to have. That's what a peakrate is for to allow slightly higher
> rates than the usual rate.
>
But rate can be average rate per session, similar to voice traffic, which
has somewhere around 40% on period for interactive and 75-85 % for non
interactive. Then rate and peakrate are different in such cases.
Maybe somebody might give a better explanation than this !!
--
Vinay.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Vinay V. Kulkarni
Project Assistant, ERNET, ECE Dept., IISc., Bangalore 560 012
Ph : +91-80-360 0855. Fax : +91-80-360 7991
-------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]