On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 09:57:27AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Quite frankly, PnP as a standard sucks. Anything that just reads > > the PnP standard and tries to force that on Linux will be most > > definitely ignored. > Since M$ and Intel have agreed more or less to kill ISA, how much PnP > stuff is really needed in the kernel long term? I guess we should drop support for 386 and 486 too... -Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Zlatko Calusic
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Zlatko Calusic
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Alan Cox
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Gregory Maxwell
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Linus Torvalds
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Linus Torvalds
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis