On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > You could boot dos (or freedos or whatever suits you) > ^^^^^^^^ > > Have the autoexec.bat run isapnptools > > and then loadlin linux. > > To play the devil's advocate: non-Intel machines (e.g. my CHRP box) may have > ISA boards, too. Note that all commercial vendors I know of that really try to support all ISA boards n non-intel platforms use a simple x86 emulator in order to be able to run the BIOS code on the card at bootup. Linux does it on alpha, for example. It doesn't have to be a complete x86 emulator, and in the Linux/alpha case it isn't, but thinking that you can avoid running the board BIOS is wishful thinking. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Linus Torvalds
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Linus Torvalds
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Zlatko Calusic
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Zlatko Calusic
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Zlatko Calusic
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Alan Cox
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Gregory Maxwell
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Linus Torvalds
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Linus Torvalds
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis
- Re: de4x5.c patch against 2.1.117 Dan Hollis