Linux-Networking Digest #776, Volume #9 Mon, 4 Jan 99 17:14:10 EST
Contents:
Re: Replace NetWare w/Linux? (David Barnes)
RFD: comp.os.linux.security (Erik de Castro Lopo)
named.boot & hosts files - are these correct use of (Mark Worsdall)
Getting rid of IPX & Appletalk during BOOT - How? (Mark Worsdall)
Re: Can ping IP address but not server name??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: After IP Masquerade done ?? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: SAMBA Linux to NT ("Jack J. Woehr")
modprobe error after kernel upgrade (No Spam)
which one to download to install (Miles5)
3c905B running DHCP in Red Hat 5.1 ("Edgar J. Zaragoza")
ppp problem ("Morten Johansen")
ppp problem ("Morten Johansen")
Re: HELP!!! Linux Questions! ("Bertie Price")
Re:Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home (Shane
Bearham)
Re: Re:Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!! ("DG")
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!! ("DG")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Replace NetWare w/Linux?
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 13:36:02 -0500
Samba will handle network logins. I believe I saw a reference to being able
to use profiles w/ Samba as well, but I've never tried to do it myself.
Barnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josh Arnold wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to replace our NetWare server with Linux, however I'm
> not sure if Linux can do what we need. The first thing it needs to do
> is be a fileserver - AFAIK this is no problem w/SAMBA (correct me if I'm
> wrong.) Secondly, we need Windows user login. That is, when our
> Windows machines first boot up they should have to enter a
> username/password to gain network access like our NetWare server
> currently does. This is the part where I'm not sure if Linux can do it
> (at least without extra software, apparently Caldera has some kindof
> "NetWare for Linux"?) Can Linux do this? Also, can Linux do NT things
> like storing user profiles? Thanks.
------------------------------
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.security.unix,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: RFD: comp.os.linux.security
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 19:03:30 GMT
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.os.linux.security
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of a
world-wide unmoderated Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.security. This
is not a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this time.
Procedural details are below.
Newsgroup line:
comp.os.linux.security Security and the Linux Operating System.
RATIONALE: comp.os.linux.security
The number of users of the Linux Operating System has grown
significantly over the last few years. A large number of these new
users are connecting their machines to the internet via modems with
little or no thought about the security of their machines. In
addition, the standard installation procedure of most Linux
distributions results in a machine with maximal capabilities but also
with a number of possible security holes. A search of a usenet
archiving site such as dejanews would quickly find a large number of
linux security discussion threads scattered across numerous existing
newsgroups.
The existing newsgroup comp.unix.security is useful but its
discussion content is aimed more at the unix admistrator level.
Therefore a newsgroup specifically aimed at the home/small business
Linux user would complement rather than replace discussion on
comp.unix.security.
CHARTER: comp.os.linux.security
This newsgroup is dedicated to the discussion of issues related to
establishing and maintaining the security of machines running the
Linux Operating System on all processor architectures.
Discussion of techniques and software for protecting machines against
remote attacks (via a network connection) as well as attacks from
untrusted local users are welcome. Discussion of ways and means of
breaking into Linux machines are not welcome.
The posting of commercial information to this group is permitted only
if the information is directly relevant to security and the Linux
Operating System.
Messages which are cross-posted to or from any advocacy newsgroup are
not welcome. Spamming, ECP and EMP of any sort is absolutely not
tolerated.
END CHARTER.
PROCEDURE:
This is a request for discussion, not a call for votes. In this phase
of the process, any potential problems with the proposed newsgroups
should be raised and resolved. The discussion period will continue
for a minimum of 21 days (starting from when the first RFD for this
proposal is posted to news.announce.newgroups), after which a Call For
Votes (CFV) may be posted by a neutral vote taker if the discussion
warrants it. Please do not attempt to vote until this happens.
All discussion of this proposal should be posted to news.groups.
This RFD attempts to comply fully with the Usenet newsgroup creation
guidelines outlined in "How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup" and "How
to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal". Please refer to these
documents (available in news.announce.newgroups) if you have any
questions about the process.
DISTRIBUTION:
This RFD has been posted to the newsgroups:
news.announce.newgroups,
news.groups,
comp.security.unix,
comp.os.linux.networking,
comp.os.linux.setup
Proponent: Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Mark Worsdall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: named.boot & hosts files - are these correct use of
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 18:31:14 +0000
Hi,
I have 2 machines on my network:-
10.0.1.250 win98
10.0.1.252 jilldando
jilldando is running named and win98 has it's TCP/IP DNS setup as
HOSTNAME win98 and DNS server as 10.0.1.252
I have ensured there is not C:\windows\hosts & C:\windows\lmhosts files
present on win98 (Renamed them *.sam)
I know for such a small network I should use hosts files on win98 &
jilldando but I want to get to grips with named.
So from win98 I hope to be able to enter any of the following and the IP
address will be returned so that the package can connect.
i.e. with ie agent typing the url http://www.shadow.home on win98 will
allow win98 to connect to 10.0.1.252 (jilldando) and so the Apache
server on that machine will then serve those pages. Once I know this is
setup correctly I can check /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf is setup
correctly which I believe it is using VirtualHost
Some resolving is happening, since Apache on win98 is not reporting any
resolving problems when starting up (Yes I am also run Apache 1.3.3 on
win98 as well as on jilldando), but it takes over 5 seconds to resolve.
Should it take this long?
The same happens with telnet jilldando, a wait of 60 seconds. If I
telnet 10.0.1.252 it is instant (Well almost). I cannot however telnet
to jilldando.linux.
NOTE: I want to use named service for local Intranet name resolving
(domain name translation into IP addresses).
/etc/named.boot
;
; a caching only nameserver config
;
directory /var/named
cache . named.ca
primary 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa named.local
primary 10.0.1.250 worsdall.demon.co.uk
primary 10.0.1.252 www.worsdall.home
primary 10.0.1.252 www.shadow.home
primary 10.0.1.252 www.hinwick.home
primary 10.0.1.250 www.shadow.win98
primary 10.0.1.250 www.worsdall.win98
/etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
10.0.1.252 jilldando.linux jilldando
10.0.1.250 worsdall.demon.co.uk win98
/etc/host.conf
order hosts, bind
multi on
/etc/hostname
jilldando.linux
--
Mark Worsdall - Oh no, I've run out of underpants :(
Home:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB site:- http://www.worsdall.demon.co.uk
Shadow:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB site:- http://www.shadow.org.uk
Work:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB site:- http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk
TCP/IP gatewaying http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk/computerDept/
------------------------------
From: Mark Worsdall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Getting rid of IPX & Appletalk during BOOT - How?
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 17:50:54 +0000
Hi, How can I stop this IPX during the BOOT sequence, I do not need IPX
or Appletalk.
Jan 4 00:58:34 jilldando kernel:
Swansea University Computer Society IPX 0.34 for NET3.035
Jan 4 00:58:34 jilldando kernel:
IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
Jan 4 00:58:34 jilldando kernel:
Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
--
Mark Worsdall - Oh no, I've run out of underpants :(
Home:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB site:- http://www.worsdall.demon.co.uk
Shadow:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB site:- http://www.shadow.org.uk
Work:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB site:- http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk
TCP/IP gatewaying http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk/computerDept/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can ping IP address but not server name???
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 15:36:08 GMT
On Sun, 03 Jan 1999 19:44:27 GMT, Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>actually you don;t need the dot
>just hosts will work correctly :)
Not if you're using Notepad.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: After IP Masquerade done ??
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 15:46:35 GMT
On Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:51:12 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin
Martin) wrote:
>In article <757338$sf2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, it says "Joekie"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Can anyone tell me how to configure so that the modem dial when the client
>>from Win95 get access to the Internet and the line drop if nobody get access
>>to the Internet ???
>
>Yep. I never got diald to work, but dial-on-demand is built in to the
>current pppd (which is NOT the one that is distributed with the kernel, for
>some reason no one has ever explained very well!).
>
>I collected and edited some posts to this group on the combined subjects of
>pppd dial-on-demand and IP masquerade and saved them at this address:
>
><http://www.nic.com/~cannon/Linux/>
This is magnificent. Thank you.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 09:02:22 -0700
From: "Jack J. Woehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SAMBA Linux to NT
Hmm ... Well, I'm logged on NT under the same name as one of the
accounts on my Linux box ...
"R.A. Wilson" wrote:
>
> I'm not an expert on SAMBA, but I do have it running on
> my home LAN okay. The only time I have experienced the
> problem you describe is when the name of the person
> logged onto the Windows box does not match the name of
> the person who owns the home directory on the Linux box.
> maybe you could try "synchronizing" the names?
>
> r.a.wilson
> =================================================================
>
> On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
>
> > I've got SAMBA on RedHat 5.1 working, I can list files
> > on the NT machine from Linux okay. But NT can't connect
> > to any of the shares on Linux. NT keeps telling me that
> > the user is not allowed to connect from that workstation.
> >
> > I've read the FAQ and tried every trick in the SAMBA
> > configuration I can think of. Any tips, please? TIA.
--
Jack J. Woehr # The Drug War is Race War
PO Box 51, Golden, CO 80402 # The Drug War is Class War.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] # The Drug War is Civil War.
http://www.well.com/~jax/rcfb # Arrest the War on Drugs.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (No Spam)
Subject: modprobe error after kernel upgrade
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 15:19:53 GMT
After upgrading my RH5.1 box from kernel 2.0.34 to 2.0.36 using the RH
RPM's, I've started getting the following error on bootup and
shutdown;
modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-6
This error first shows after ipforward is turned off and then
reappears after the eth0 interface is enabled. The strange thing is
that earlier in the boot sequence the message "Finding module
dependancies....done" appears after the root partition is remounted.
Can someone please give me some clues as to where to look and what I
may need to do to fix this error. The box seems to be working okay
but I don't like mysterious errors.
TIA,
Scott.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miles5)
Subject: which one to download to install
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 15:45:55 GMT
hello,
I had found a site that got redhat for download, but there got so many
directories and I don't know which one to download, please, can
someone show me the way,I would like to download the whole
installation directories, so please point out,
and, the site is
http://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat
Thanks
------------------------------
From: "Edgar J. Zaragoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,rec.models.railroad,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: 3c905B running DHCP in Red Hat 5.1
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 09:36:56 -0600
Hi,
I am trying to bring my 3com 3c905B ethernet card up to run
with DHCP in Red Hat 5.1. However, in /var/log/messages, I
am seeing an entry by the dhcp client daemon saying "no
DHCPOFFER messages".
I then turned on the debugging option on the driver,
the following fhowed up after I typed dmesg.
Can anyone help me debug this? It seems like the driver
is trying to send packets, but after a number of tries,
it sets the card to promiscuous mode and then it seems
like the driver just went down w/ all the packets still
in its transmit queue.
Thanks in advance for your advice.
Winston
*************************************************************
ss ANSI SCSI revision: 02
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
Trying to unmount old root ... okay
Adding Swap: 130500k swap-space (priority -1)
Detected scsi tape st0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 3, lun 0
sysctl: ip forwarding off
Swansea University Computer Society IPX 0.34 for NET3.035
IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
3c59x.c:v0.99 4/7/98 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
loading device 'eth0'...
eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xd000, 00:10:5a:5d:48:4e, IRQ 5
Internal config register is 1800000, transceivers 0xa.
8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/10baseT interface.
Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
eth0: Initial media type 100baseTX.
eth0: vortex_open() InternalConfig 01c00000.
eth0: vortex_open() irq 5 media status 8080.
eth0: Filling in the Rx ring.
eth0: Media selection timer tick happened, 100baseTX.
eth0: Media 100baseTX is has no link beat, 8080.
eth0: Media selection failed, now trying 10baseT port.
eth0: Media selection timer finished, 10baseT.
eth0: Media selection timer tick happened, 10baseT.
eth0: Media 10baseT has link beat, 88c0.
eth0: Media selection timer finished, 10baseT.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 0.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 2 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 1.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 2 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 2.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 1 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
ARP: arp called for own IP address
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 3.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 2 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 4.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 1 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
ARP: arp called for own IP address
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 5.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 1 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
ARP: arp called for own IP address
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 6.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 2 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 7.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 1 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 8.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 2 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 9.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 2 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 10.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 1 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 11.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 1 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 12.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 2 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Trying to send a packet, Tx index 13.
eth0: interrupt, status e201, latency 1 ticks.
eth0: In interrupt loop, status e201.
eth0: exiting interrupt, status e000.
eth0: Setting promiscuous mode.
eth0: vortex_close() status e000, Tx status 00.
eth0: vortex close stats: rx_nocopy 0 rx_copy 0 tx_queued 14.
------------------------------
From: "Morten Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp problem
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 16:40:34 +0100
We're trying to link two computers with a serial cable
using the pppd
One is running Red Hat Linux 4.2 and the other one Red Hat Linux 5.2
what is wrong with this: (!?)
pppd -detach lock crtscts [localip]:[remoteip] /dev/modem 38400 &
i have no getty installed
routing is not an issue here
isn't the ppp0 device supposed to show up when i run ifconfig ?
help is greatly appreciated
Morten Johansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Morten Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp problem
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 16:40:34 +0100
We're trying to link two computers with a serial cable
using the pppd
One is running Red Hat Linux 4.2 and the other one Red Hat Linux 5.2
what is wrong with this: (!?)
pppd -detach lock crtscts [localip]:[remoteip] /dev/modem 38400 &
i have no getty installed
routing is not an issue here
isn't the ppp0 device supposed to show up when i run ifconfig ?
help is greatly appreciated
Morten Johansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Bertie Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,linux.dev.scsi,linux.dev.net
Subject: Re: HELP!!! Linux Questions!
Date: 4 Jan 1999 20:48:49 GMT
Linux can be networked by installing and configuring SAMBA.
This works very well.
Steve K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Help!
> I have some questions on linux
> first, can you network linux & 95/98 systems?
> second, why does linux come up with errors using my AHA-1542B SCSI card?
> third, How do you tell the free space left on the drive?
>
> any help is greatly appreciated
>
> Steve Krippner
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: Shane Bearham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re:Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 03:10:42 +1100
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> LISTEN HERE, SH**FACE !!! I AM POSTING A PROBLEM TO WHICH I WANT A
> SOLUTION, NOT IRRELEVANT BULLSH** !!! GOD KNOWS WHEN YOU'LL GET THAT
> THROUGH YOUR MF BRAIN !!! BESIDES, NOT EVERYONE IS LIKE YOU, PAYING
> FOR EVERY THING !!! I'M SURE THERE HAVE BEEN PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO HAVE
> BEEN ABLE TO DO IT WITHOUT HAVING TO PAY !!! I READ YOUR ENTIRE SH**
> POST-REPLY BY THE WAY AND ALL YOU GIVE IS NOTHING BUT IRRELEVANT
> BULLSH** !!! HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO KEEP TELLING A DUMBF*** LIKE
> YOU THAT I AM NOT INTERESTED IN OTHER UNIX/LINUX OPERATING SYSTEMS !!!
> SINCE NOTHING GETS THROUGH YOUR HEAD, HERE'S MY ADVICE TO YOU: EAT MUD
I perceive you to be a person with much pirated software
but that is not relevant
I also believe you like to do things the hardest way possible
!!!! you could print out the source code and hand assemble it onto the computer in
question
!!!!!!
I have a question or two to ponder...... which you DON'T have to answer of coarse.
Q. How much does it cost for your net connection per month ???????
Q. How much do you pay for Data/Phone charges
A Linux CDROM ( any flavour) costs a megere $3 to $15 here (Australia )
I now have purchased 6 such sets so far ( different releases/versions ), damn I'm
broke......
I even purchsed a Red Hat 5.2 CD for $15 of which I'm personally not that fond of but
non the less I have it... I don't consider that a loss either.....
I have foresight that I will indeed purchase many more in the future
I hate to have to say this....
But, GO BACK TO WINDOZE.....
it seems you will be happier there
At least you can get your free software, after buying the blanks to burn it onto
oh and the $200-$400 you probably paid (well maybe ) for burner as well.
My opinions are my own and not in any way representitive of that of my company..
--
+-----------------------------+----------------------------+
| Xtreme Systems Technologies \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Working towards the future. | +61-41-496-2569 |
| www.xtremetech.com.au \ ICQ 353180 |
+---------------------------------+------------------------+
2:44am up 23:38, 8 users, load average: 0.16, 0.17, 0.17
------------------------------
From: "DG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Re:Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home
but am stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 20:54:03 GMT
And here's my reply suggestion to you: EAT S*** AND GO F*** YOURSELF !!!
Shane Bearham wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
>>
>> LISTEN HERE, SH**FACE !!! I AM POSTING A PROBLEM TO WHICH I WANT A
>> SOLUTION, NOT IRRELEVANT BULLSH** !!! GOD KNOWS WHEN YOU'LL GET THAT
>> THROUGH YOUR MF BRAIN !!! BESIDES, NOT EVERYONE IS LIKE YOU, PAYING
>> FOR EVERY THING !!! I'M SURE THERE HAVE BEEN PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO HAVE
>> BEEN ABLE TO DO IT WITHOUT HAVING TO PAY !!! I READ YOUR ENTIRE SH**
>> POST-REPLY BY THE WAY AND ALL YOU GIVE IS NOTHING BUT IRRELEVANT
>> BULLSH** !!! HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO KEEP TELLING A DUMBF*** LIKE
>> YOU THAT I AM NOT INTERESTED IN OTHER UNIX/LINUX OPERATING SYSTEMS !!!
>> SINCE NOTHING GETS THROUGH YOUR HEAD, HERE'S MY ADVICE TO YOU: EAT MUD
>
>I perceive you to be a person with much pirated software
>but that is not relevant
>
>I also believe you like to do things the hardest way possible
>!!!! you could print out the source code and hand assemble it onto the
computer in question
>!!!!!!
>
>I have a question or two to ponder...... which you DON'T have to answer of
coarse.
>Q. How much does it cost for your net connection per month ???????
>Q. How much do you pay for Data/Phone charges
>
>A Linux CDROM ( any flavour) costs a megere $3 to $15 here (Australia )
>
>I now have purchased 6 such sets so far ( different releases/versions ),
damn I'm broke......
>I even purchsed a Red Hat 5.2 CD for $15 of which I'm personally not that
fond of but
>non the less I have it... I don't consider that a loss either.....
>
>I have foresight that I will indeed purchase many more in the future
>
>I hate to have to say this....
>But, GO BACK TO WINDOZE.....
>it seems you will be happier there
>
>At least you can get your free software, after buying the blanks to burn it
onto
>oh and the $200-$400 you probably paid (well maybe ) for burner as well.
>
>
>
>
>
>My opinions are my own and not in any way representitive of that of my
company..
>
>--
>+-----------------------------+----------------------------+
>| Xtreme Systems Technologies \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
>| Working towards the future. | +61-41-496-2569 |
>| www.xtremetech.com.au \ ICQ 353180 |
>+---------------------------------+------------------------+
>
>
> 2:44am up 23:38, 8 users, load average: 0.16, 0.17, 0.17
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "DG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but
am stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 20:55:15 GMT
Very funny, dips*** !!!
Richard Stevens wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Go to a store and buy a redhat Distribution CD for a few bucks!
>
>That shuould help
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
