Linux-Networking Digest #812, Volume #9 Fri, 8 Jan 99 01:13:42 EST
Contents:
Re: ISA/PCI Networking (Rdunzl)
Re: routing problem (Vincent Zweije)
Re: How to Determine if ifwadm is installed? (Jim Richardson)
Re: Telneting as "root" (Rob Wiltbank)
Re: Shadow + NIS + Solaris (Thorsten Kukuk)
Re: IBM PCI Token Ring (Paul Norton)
Re: to anyone trying to get the second b channel to connect under linux ("Bob Fahey
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]")
Re: Masquerading and Novell shares (patrick thempel)
Re: IP connection (patrick thempel)
Re: still having ppp problems. (patrick thempel)
Re: modemdriver under linux? (patrick thempel)
Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: 3Com Megahertz 3CCFEM556BI and RedHat 5.2 - almost there (?) ("d4d")
amd (automount daemon) configuration (Giovanni Organtini)
Re: browsing a samba share in security=user (Dan Falk)
Re: Load Balancing web servers... (Bernd Eckenfels)
Re: Connect 2 NIC's to one Samba server? (Shaun Lipscombe)
Re: ADSL (Dan Falk)
Re: Multihomed Network Timeouts ("Scott Brause")
Re: Forgot something - Linux Samba Domain Controller Server Problem
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Rdunzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: ISA/PCI Networking
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 09:04:56 -0600
Jim Finney wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I cannot get my Linksys ISA 10mb lan card to be recognized by the
> RedHat5.1 installation program. I am trying to install it in a 100mHz
> Compaq and it is telling me that it "cannot find the device anywhere on
> the system". I have tried several different IRQ and I/O settings but
> have not had success. The card is recognized and works OK under Windows
> 98. It is an older machine with an ISA/PCI bridge in it. It supposedly
> will accept both ISA and PCI cards.
I have one, a PCI board. I had to tell the system it was ISA or it
wouldn't work. Then I just gave the install program the IRQ and it found
it. It wouldn't take with both IRQ and I/O or simply I/O settings.
--
First rule of intelligent tinkering - save all the parts
------------------------------
From: Vincent Zweije <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: routing problem
Date: 7 Jan 1999 14:19:12 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Stifter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Reformatted. Please don't word wrap diagrams, and keep text within
76 columns.]
|| I have the following situation:
|| | |--------------| |--------|
|| | eth1 / a.b.c.1 | linux 2.0.35 | eth0 / a.b.c.224 | router |
|| |-----------------| firewall |-------------------| |-----internet /
|ISP
|| | | masquerading | |--------|
|| | | -------------|
|| ethernet
|| a.b.c.*
|| (without a.b.c.224)
|| |
|| * infos:
|| from my ISP, I got 16 IP's, a.b.c.224 - a.b.c.239. I decided to use the
|| whole C-net a.b.c.*, but to masquerade all other than a.b.c.224 - .239
|| (e.g. a.b.c.50 goes into the internet with a.b.c.224, with a different
|| port...)
Your [sic] not using reserved IP addresses will give you two problems:
(1) The true owners of the masqueraded addresses will not be reachable.
This might be a real problem, as they are no doubt with the same ISP.
(2) The true owners of the masqueraded addresses will be very unhappy
with you when packets leak out unmasqueraded.
|| * problem:
|| I have to route all a.b.c.* except one IP (a.b.c.224) to eth1, a.b.c.224
|| to eth0, and the default as well to eth0.
You don't have to route a.b.c.224 at all, because it's the firewall's
own address. You do have to route the internal address of the router
via eth1, but that's probably not in your a.b.c.224/16 network. Even if
it were, it would not be a problem, because the most specific route
(longest netmask) has priority.
|| - how do I configure with ifconfig eth0 and eth1 ?
If you insist on keeping your current setup:
ifconfig eth0 a.b.c.224 netmask 255.255.255.240 broadcast a.b.c.239 up
ifconfig eth1 a.b.c.1 up
Just in case, use proxyarp on eth1 to pick up a.b.c.224 packets there.
|| - how do I set up the routing (with route) ?
route add -host <routerip> dev eth0
route add -net a.b.c.0 dev eth1
route add default gw <routerip>
Firewall rules left as an exercise to the reader. RTFM.
Hope this helps. Vincent.
--
Vincent Zweije <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "If you're flamed in a group you
<http://www.xs4all.nl/~zweije/> | don't read, does anybody get burnt?"
[Xhost should be taken out and shot] | -- Paul Tomblin on a.s.r.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Richardson)
Subject: Re: How to Determine if ifwadm is installed?
Date: 8 Jan 1999 03:53:59 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 07 Jan 1999 04:14:32 GMT,
John P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sayeth...:
bash> which ipfwadm
which will tell you if it is installed _and_ it is in your path.
If you are using Redhat, or another system with rpm.
bash> rpm -q ipfwadm
will tell you if the rpm database shows it is installed.
Debian has a similar system, but I am unfamiliar with it.
You could also just type the command and see what happens :)
oh,
bash> man ipfwadm
will bring up the man pages (if installed.)
>Yup! Seems my fingers didn't work on the "p" key that day <g>.
>I was searching for ipfwadm though and since I'm new to Linux, I
>wasn't sure how to determine if the program was installed.
>
>John
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Giovanni Gigante) wrote:
>
>>
>>>>How do I determine if ifwadm is installed in RH5.1?
>>
>>Excuse me, but wasn't it "ipfwadm" the right name?
>>
>>No wonder you can't find it... :))
>>
>>Giovanni Gigante
>
--
Jim Richardson
Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
WWW.eskimo.com/~warlock
Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.
------------------------------
From: Rob Wiltbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Telneting as "root"
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 04:29:14 +0000
A.G. wrote:
> I have just configured two ethernet cards to connect two linux machines.
>
> I can remotely telnet to any of the machines, but not as root to either.
> Just as a regular user.
>
> Is this normal or I have misconfigured smth?
>
> Thanx a lot!
>
> A.G.
Disabled.
An alternative method for this is to create another account, logging in
under that and typing: su
You then supply the root password and you have root access.
Rob
------------------------------
From: Thorsten Kukuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Shadow + NIS + Solaris
Date: 7 Jan 1999 15:07:27 GMT
Hello,
Maciek Uhlig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pam_unix_auth module runs as root. It issues getpwnam and gets the
> CORRECT password from NIS (i.e. from passwd.adjunct.byname map). Then it
> issues seteuid and changes uid to logging user id in order to get the
> user password in case of NIS+ running. However it's not the case and the
> second getpwname gets INCORRECT password as ##user from passwd.byname map
> because ordinary user can not see passwd.adjunct.byname map. Obviously
> the salt is then incorrect and pam_unix_auth returns with PAM_AUTH_ERR.
> This is the reason why Michael Kriss observed "NIS match" and "NIS no such
> map" for passwd.adjunct.byname. For the first time he was root, for the
> second time he was ordinary user only.
> So, if you want to get shadow + NIS + Solaris passwd.adjunct running you
> have to modify your pam_unix_auth.c and don't let it issue seteuid call.
> As a quick hack you could comment out "NIS+" support from the source code.
> Don't forget to compile and install pam_unix_auth.so :-))
Yes, somebody has changed my patch for pam_unix_auth to do so a stupid
thing. If I find the time, I will make a correct patch for it. It is
wrong to make this always, only if you get a *NP* back as password,
you should do a seteuid call.
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.pages.de/~kukuk/
Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
------------------------------
From: Paul Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IBM PCI Token Ring
Date: 07 Jan 1999 08:06:15 -0800
JAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way to make contact with these splendid fellows? I'd like
> to ask them where they'll announce the release of their drivers.
> Also, in my experience, it helps such people being more productive
> when fools like myself keep panting down their necks with impatient
> questions ;-)
The ibmtr extensions will be ready before LANStreamer, though I'm
kinda working on both in parallel. I can't give any kind of
"release date" as that depends on the amount of time I can
spend on the drivers and is somewhat nondeterministic. Especially
with the pre-2.2.0 testing going on, which must take priority
right now.
------------------------------
From: "Bob Fahey [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: to anyone trying to get the second b channel to connect under linux
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 21:59:40 -0500
AOL ALERT, ALERT, ALERT
run will robinson, run!
Felix Dominguez wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>i read a document somewhere (sorry i forget the url)
>that stated "Multilink PPP is only compatible with PAP"
>
>so if you isp doesnt support PAP well your not SOL but ill tell you one
>thing simple text authintacation is not gonna work
>if you cant to connect both b-channels
>
>if you have a 3comImpactIQ setup it up under windows95/98 for 64kbs per
>channel and multilink enabled
>if you dont have windows its ats60=64s80=1
>
>s60=64 sets your rate to 64kbps
>and
>s80=1 enables Multilink PPP
>
>i hope this helps someone
>i spent 18 hours searching for a lot of info and trying out many ideas and
>thats what works...
>
>again in summary
>
>Im using PAP as my authintacation protocol
>i setup my 3comImpactIQ in windows so my init string is just AT&FH0
>and to dial atd#######
>
>good luck to all
>its been fun
>felix
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: patrick thempel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Masquerading and Novell shares
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 12:03:48 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hup
this seems to be a lot in one step -
try breaking down in smaller steps, i.e. try to connect to the novell-server
from your box via the modem first, see if she can map the novell-drives from
your machine, etc...
Brian J King wrote:
> I just recently set up IP masquerading on my Linux box to share my modem
> with my girlfriend's laptop. I'm running the developmental kernel,
> 2.2.0-pre4 and using ipchains to set it up. What I would like to do is to
> set up masquerading so that my girlfriend can sit down on her laptop, do a
> Novell login to a specific server, tree, and context and her windows
> machine will automatically 'mount' the networked drives in that context.
>
> I know I need to get ipx set up first, but can I tell if it is working by
> using something like ifconfig, or not. Will I need to find out actual
> addresses of the Novell servers she is trying to log into and put them in
> some sort of routing table or not? ANy help would be appreciated. I'm not
> too sure where to start or how to walk through this one....
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian King
------------------------------
From: patrick thempel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP connection
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 12:39:30 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi wolfgang,
does your isp provide you with a dns-server?
try ping something ( e.g. www.yahoo.com) see if this gets resolved
if all else is ok, maybe you need to set the configuration in netscape ( where
depends on which version u use)
Wolfgang Grossbauer wrote:
> Hi folks,
> since a few days I'm fiddling on my LINUX internet connection, but it still
> does not work.
> The system is a SuSE 5.3 and "/etc/ppp/ppp-up" connects to my provider and
> it looks good.
> But how dow I get Netscape started? Currently I starx the windowsmanager
> (vwm2 or so) and the start Netscape.
> All I get is that there is ".... no DNS entry", but the /etc/hosts,
> /etc/resolv.conf are set up properly.
> Below is the ifconfig-output of the ppp0 when the ppp connection to the IP
> is up.
>
> ppp0 Link encap:Point-Point Protocol
> inet addr:195.70.98.160 P-t-P:195.70.98.193 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>
> Thanks for help,
> Wolfgang Grossbauer
------------------------------
From: patrick thempel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: still having ppp problems.
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 12:47:55 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seems the error messages are to-the-point
recompile your kernel and add support for ppp and iso9660
both seem not to be included in your boot-disk-kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Thanks for your help already, but still no luck.
> O.K this time I'll supply more info.
>
> I'm booting from a boot disk.
> kernel version: 2.0.34 may 8th '98.
> error message pppd: system lacks kernel support for PPP.
> ppp version :ppp-2.3.3
>
> O.K I've tried to understand what it says in the README.linux file in
> docs/ppp-2.3.3/ but to no avail.
>
> I can get a conection using minicon but I get a no carrier error.
>
> Any Surggestions?
>
> Also another small (sorry not networking) problem. I can't get my cdrom to
> work. Using fstool when I try and mount it I get a message saying no
> /dev/hdc in mtab or fstab ? My fstab has /dev/cdrom .
> If I add /dev/hdc with /mnt/cdrom I gat an error saying: fs type iso9660 not
> supported by kernel.
>
> Thanks again in advance for your help.
>
> Paul Eastman
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: patrick thempel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modemdriver under linux?
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 12:59:11 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i use one of those as well -
didn't need no driver, though-
just edit your pppconfiguration-files ( i'm using kppp and put 115200 as speed
in there)
Hans-Juergen Seifen wrote:
> I've a 3Com U.S Robotics 56K. I use it under Linux. It works as a low speed
> modem with 9800 Bps. Where can I find the correct driver for linux? Can you
> help me?
> Thanks Hans
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Date: 8 Jan 1999 04:03:16 GMT
David Shepherd wrote:
> Whilst this obnoxious person has been winding everyone up, there has
> been mention of what his ISP would think of his antics. Assuming he uses
> an ISP. I just pointed my browser at www.hdtv.com and it turns out to be
> a company called Image Circuits, consulting engineers specializing in
> the design of digital video systems. There is no mention of providing an
> Internet Service, so it would appear that he is an employee. Perhaps
> the management of Image Circuits would be interested?!
No, that's just a forgery. I traced him back through dejanews. The kid's
name is Dilip Rajan. His real email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Dominion University (ODU-DOM)
128 Hughes Hall 4900 Hampton Blvd.
Norfolk, VA 23529-0227
US
His older email address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The College of William & Mary (WM-DOM)
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
His known aliases include:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are not untracable Dillip!
------------------------------
From: "d4d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,comp.sys.laptops
Subject: Re: 3Com Megahertz 3CCFEM556BI and RedHat 5.2 - almost there (?)
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 22:33:38 -0600
This sounds exactly like the same problem I am currently having with my
3c575a on my Dell Latitude running Redhat 5.2. I have not applied the
patches as Filip has - however, by using the "procedure" as described by
Filip (fumbling is more appropriate) I was able to get the nic working
once - until the next restart. Cardctl sees the card. I have futzed w/ the
/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 script, the /pcmcia/network.opt script, and
ifconfig until I am blue-in-the-face-and-pulling-aout-my-hair! Any clues?
David Hinds wrote in message <76u621$i1u$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>tmf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>:
>: I have gathered some experience with the Tecra 8000 and the 3Com
>: Megahertz 3CCFEM556BI, but I'm not
>: that far that I got it actually working... :-(
>
snip
>:(I can't quite
>: recall the exact "procedure", I remember stopping the network, unloading
>: the modules, do a "cardctl
>: eject; cardctl insert" and restarting the network, but I never managed
>: to bring the network back to
>: life again later).
>
>Some people have reported success using procedures like this.
That is all in how you define "success".
Jeff
------------------------------
From: Giovanni Organtini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: amd (automount daemon) configuration
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:23:18 +0000
Hi,
I'm trying to use amd to automount few remote filesystems on one of my
linux boxes. Even if it should be straightforward I could not succeed,
there should be some lack in the documentation.
I want to see a filesystem named /home/ly belonging to a computer called
pcaccos on anothre computer called pcdrmon. Then I added the following
line to /etc/exports:
/home/ly pcaccos(rw)
and I tested I could mount it with the usual mount command on pcdrmon:
mount -t nfs pcaccos:/home/ly /mnt/other
Then I wrote the amd.conf file as:
home/ly rhost:=pcaccos;rfs:=/home/ly;type:=nfs;fs:=${autodir}/${key}
When I run amd without parameters it reads the file and say:
AMDCONF: parse error on line 0 (section null)
Of course I checked that the right file is read adding lines on top of
the file and checking that the parse error on line message changes
accordingly. And, of course, there is no way to see the filesystem nor
in the /home/ly nor in its real mounteing position /a/home/ly.
Does anybody knows the answer?
Thank you.
Giovanni
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 00:19:01 -0500
From: Dan Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: browsing a samba share in security=user
I would try setting (in smb.conf) :
encrypt passwords = yes
passwd program = /bin/smbpasswd
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
NOTE: I used RH 5.2
then use the smbpasswd program to create the smbpasswd file. I think there
is a way to import/convert your /etc/passwd file. This worked for me :^)
However, I believe there may be some problem with my pam_pwdb.so module that
is used in my /etc/pam.d/samba file (if none of this module stuff makes
sense to you, don't worry its probably a corrupt file on my part :^( ).
Check your /var/log/messages file for authentification errors.
Hope this helps!
-Dan Falk
George Shaunfield wrote:
> I got the same message from an NT Workstation machine after switching
> Samba to security=user. The problem was that NT was trying to use
> encrypted password (it never asked for the logon). The solution that I
> used was to edit the Registry and tell it to enable plain text password.
> In this folder of the registry:
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\system\CurrentControlSet\Services\rdr\parameters\
>
> add this DWord entry:
>
> EnablePlainTextPassword: 1
>
> I understand another approach might be to tell Samba to use encrypted
> passwords. Maybe someone else can provide the details on this.
>
> George Shaunfield
> AccounTron
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > When attempting to browse a samba share in security=user, I get
> >
> > "This user is not authorized to logon from this station."
> >
> > Anyone have any ideas why? Browsing works perfectly in security=share.
> > I have a legitimate guest account.
> >
> > Herry
> >
> > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Load Balancing web servers...
Date: 7 Jan 1999 16:20:04 GMT
Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do agree that you would need to do some calculations to determine
> where, specifically, your laod is, and how much it is.
And then there are load balancing solutions like ONE-IP, Fake or Erlang/OTP
With Eddie. Look for the next Freefire Bulletin for all the Details. Will be
here in the middle of the month.
Greetings
Bernd
--
Bernd Eckenfels - The Freefire Project -
http://sites.inka.de/lina/freefire-l/index.en.html
------------------------------
From: Shaun Lipscombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,linux.samba,comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Connect 2 NIC's to one Samba server?
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 09:38:30 +0000
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward should enable forwarding.
you can check the current status by using cat
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward.
Under redhat, this can also be configured by /etc/sysconfig/network with
the option FORWARD_IPV4=true. You have told the NT machine to use
192.168.1.1
as its gateway haven't you? otherwise the NT machine won't know how to
route to the
class C, that it is not connected to, namely 192.168.2.0.
If this fails post you ifconfig output here.
Kevin Meek wrote:
>
> I am trying to build a server using RHL 5.2 and Samba to replace
> our Netware 3.11 server. I'd like to use two network interface
> cards; a 3C905 100Mbs and a 3C509 10Mbs. The intent would be to
> connect the 3C509 to a hub and the 3C905 to a single PC using a
> direct cable (can't afford a high-speed hub or NIC's for the
> entire system right now, but would like one machine with a high
> bandwidth access). The 3C509 was automatically recognized during
> the install process, and I was able to activate the 3C905 through
> lilo.conf and conf.modules, then adding it as eth1 using Network
> Configurator. 3C509 = 192.168.1.254, 3C905 = 192.168.2.254.
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth0
> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth1
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
>
> /etc/hosts
> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
> 192.168.1.254 linux.engravers.com linux
>
> I enabled Network Packet Forwarding in the Network Configurator
> Routing tab. My NT workstation can ping and connect to Samba
> shares when it's IP address is 192.168.1.1 and connected to the
> 3C509 via the hub. But it can only ping the 3C905 when it's IP
> address is 192.168.2.1 and directly connected - Samba server is
> not browsable. I was told that enabling IP forwarding would
> somehow connect the second NIC to my Samba server, but apparently
> I'm still missing something...and obviously I don't understand
> how to address and route these things despite reading every how-to
> and dejanews article I can find. Before I give up and resign
> myself to using a single NIC, I'd appreciate any advice you have!
>
> Thanks in advance...
--
(o_
(o_ (o_ //\
(/)_ (/)_ V_/_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 00:38:08 -0500
From: Dan Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ADSL
It's easy!! no drivers except for a NIC, which Cincinnati Bell gave me:-)
Cincinnati Bell sent a guy out to set it up. They would only install it
(the NIC which is connected to the 675) into a windoze machine. Setting it
up in Linux is as easy as setting up the NIC. I know that there are
several ways you provider can setup their systems. In my case, I have to
log into a "zoomtown" and then into the ISP. Interestingly, the login is
web-based! If this is the case with your provider ... look for a login
script!! The whole web-based login is stupid. Also, if your interested in
using it over a network ... it ROCKS!! Use IP forwarding and GO. I am
watching the real video Impeachment trial of clinton on one machine and
typing this on another. ITS FAST ... REAL FAST. However, my service goes
out all the time ... they beta tested with a different configuration and
hardware. If you are going to rely on this service for internet ... make
sure it is stable!!
Have fun,
Dan Falk
Eric wrote:
> I am looking into using the 'Megabit' service that US West offers .
> Are there any special
> considerations for setting this up on when running Linux 2.0.34 on a
> 686 machine?
> I have selected an ISP which provides ADSL service, and am scheduled to
> be hooked up
> with US West at the end of the month. Have not run across any
> documentation or pointers to drivers at this point. I do not receive the
> 'modem' from them for another 3 weeks, but I would
> be interested in hearing from anyone who has set up this service.
>
> Any suggestions appreciated, besides 'RTFM', since I am not aware of
> one.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Jet
>
> J. Eric Thompson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Scott Brause" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multihomed Network Timeouts
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 11:49:38 -0500
I managed to figure out my problem for any that travel down this path. The
problem was (now rather obvious) that I had the DNS servers on the subnet
for which I killed the link. I didn't suspect this as the problem since I
was telneting in by IP address rather than name. However evidentally linux
is querying the DNS even if it does not need to reslove the query.
Scott
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.samba,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Forgot something - Linux Samba Domain Controller Server Problem
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 05:41:26 GMT
I should add -- I can't log on as any user other than root to the Samba
domain.
What have I done wrong?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi. I've got a linux box acting as a samba domain controller.
> >
> > I can access this samba system using smbclient from the local machine as
long
> > as I use the root account.
> >
> > I can change the samba passwords for any of the users on this machine.
> >
> > However, if I try to do anything while logged in as any of those other
users,
> > I get an access denied message.
> >
> > If I try to log in to this machine using samba from a windows 95 box using
> > microsoft networking, I get a domain password wrong or access to logon
server
> > has been denied unless I use the root account equivalent.
> >
> > I'm using a pretty vanilla Samba set up here, mostly what came bundled with
> > verion 1.9.18r7.
> >
> > I can SEE the samba shares from anywhere. It's just that I can't seem to log
> > in.
> >
> > I have WINS support enabled, as well asa full DNS, and DNS proxy set up to
> > resolv netbios names seeing as I'm running TCP/IP throughout, but then
again,
> > I've had this problem even before I started using DNS proxy for Netbios name
> > resolution.
> >
> > If anyone can give me an smb.conf file that can be used for a domain
> > controller, that I can play with, that they know works for them, I would
> > greatly appreciate it.
> >
> > Barring that, if you can tell me where to look in my smb.conf, I'd be more
> > than happy to try anything.
> >
> > smb.conf follows:
> >
> > [global]
> > debuglevel=1
> > workgroup=INTERNAL
> > server string=Win95 Server
> > hosts allow=192.168.2. 127. 192.168.1.
> > printcap name = /etc/printcap
> > load printers=yes
> > guest account = guest
> > log file=/var/log/samba/log.%m
> > max log size=50
> > security = server
> > encrypt passwords = no
> > smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
> > update encrypted = yes
> > username map = /etc/smbusers
> > socket options = TCP_NODELAY
> > interfaces=192.168.2.2/255.255.255.0 192.168.1.3/255.255.255.0
> > 127.0.0.1/255.255.255.254
> > remote browse sync = 192.168.2.255 192.168.1.255
> > remote announce = 192.168.2.255 192.168.2.1 192.168.1.255 192.168.1.2
> > local master = yes
> > os level = 33
> > domain master = yesdomain master = yes
> > preferred master = yes
> > domain logons = yes
> > logon script = %U.bat
> > logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U
> > wins support = yes
> > dns proxy = yes
> > preserve case = yes
> > short preserve case = yes
> > default case = lower
> > case sensitive = no
> > protocol = NT1
> > mangle case = yes
> > mangled names = yes
> > share modes = yes
> > locking = yes
> > strict locking = yeslock directory = /var/lock/samba
> > null passwords = true
> >
> > #============================ Share Definitions
==============================
> > [homes]
> > comment = Home Directories
> > browseable = no
> > writable = yes
> >
> > [netlogon]
> > comment = Network Logon Service
> > path = /home/netlogon
> > guest ok = yes
> > writable = no
> > share modes = no
> >
> > [Profiles]
> > path = /home/profiles
> > browseable = no
> > guest ok = yes
> >
> > [printers]
> > comment = All Printers
> > path = /var/spool/samba
> > browseable = yes
> > public = yes
> > # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print
> > guest ok = yes
> > writable = no
> > printable = yes
> >
> > # This one is useful for people to share files
> > [tmp]
> > comment = Temporary file space
> > path = /tmp
> > read only = no
> > public = yes
> >
> > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
> Maybe you could try to add write list = @theUsers
>
> ger
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
