Linux-Networking Digest #865, Volume #9 Wed, 13 Jan 99 03:13:55 EST
Contents:
Re: bizarre problem w/ Impact IQ/UUNet (Dave Klingler)
Re: 386 and cable modem (bill davidsen)
WEIRD modem probs under RHL 5.1 ("musician")
Re: Permitting users to start PPPD (Franklin Rouse)
Re: HELP: Setting up a DIAL-IN PPP SERVER on my Linux box?? (Matt Kressel)
PostgreSQL setup problems ("Doug Hardman")
File and Samba Write Permissions ("Fulton B. Gonzalez")
Need help with PPP (Invalid protocol error) (Roteus)
Re: Q: Network Linux and OpenDOS ? (Mike)
Re: PostgreSQL setup problems (Jon Barnett)
Re: Help! Connection refused!! (Derek Shaw)
speed within SubNet (Joe McCorkle)
Token ring (Eigil Bjorgum)
ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Invalid argument ("waxhead")
Re: IP Masquerading and MSIE (Dirk Thomalla)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Klingler)
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.isdn
Subject: Re: bizarre problem w/ Impact IQ/UUNet
Date: 12 Jan 1999 09:45:40 -0700
Amazingly enough, the Windows-only technician at UUNet tech support just
told me I wasn't entitled to know whether UUNet's routers used sync or
async PPP. He also said they only had one other customer that used Unix,
and that "nobody at UUNet knows kermit." Sigh.
So does anybody out there use Linux with UUnet?
Dave
In article <77f0tf$a55$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dave Klingler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <77d13e$kh4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>d. k. henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I have a similar problem trying to get Impact IQ- ISP - Linux Debian working
>>and
>>localized it to the ppp driver and my ISP. My ISP has synchronous PPP, so
>>even though
>>the Impact IQ is setup to handle the asynch-synch PPP conversion ( like it
>>does correctly under WinNT) it fails to do so. This was after numerous
>>emails with others having the same problem and several ppplogs. Good luck,
>>if I ever find the time away from work, I will re-write the PPP daemon to
>>handle ISDN. I cannot get Debian to re-write the ppp daemon, maybe you can
>>get Redhat to do so :P
>
>Oh, that's bad. That's also interesting, because I *know* there are
>people out there running ISDN with various Unices, Brian Lavender (who has
>graciously attempted to help me with my problem) being one of them. I had
>the same problem attempting to dial in with my NeXT at 38400.
>
>UUNet uses an Ascend TNT router. Could the incompatibility have anything
>to do with that? What does your ISP use? Maybe we can get to the bottom
>of this.
>
>Thanks!
>Dave
>
>> >Dave Klingler wrote in message
><77b349$gr7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>>Hi folks. I've got a bizarre problem with a 3com Impact IQ that's keeping
>>>me from getting anywhere on an overdue contract.
>>>
>>>Basically, I've got a Redhat 5.1 Intel box with a Lavaport 16650 serial
>>>card in it talking to the 3Com at 230400, although the baud rate doesn't
>>>seem to matter. I've also tried talking to the Impact with my NeXT Cube,
>>>which is currently acting as my router via an analog modem.
>>>
>>>My ISP is UUNet, and I've purchased an unlimited account with them. I
>>>believe the local dialup is an Ascend TNT. The Impact has 3.2 firmware.
>>>
>>>I'm using Kermit to talk to the Impact, just to experiment and get my init
>>>strings right. I dial in to UUNet and get a 64k connection, but nothing
>>>happens after that. I can "+++" back to the modem and send more AT
>>>commands, but I never get anything back from UUNet. The B1 channel light
>>>comes on and stays lit for a little while, but I can't seem to do anything
>>>else.
>>>
>>>===========
>>>The bizarre part is that so far as I can tell, the SD light isn't even
>>>flickering when I send characters.
>>>===========
>>>
>>>What's a little upsetting is that Friday afternoon I was able to log in to
>>>UUNet four times in a row using Kermit, but I didn't yet have the ppp
>>>daemon up and running on the Linux box. That night I got back to it and
>>>it's been as I described above ever since.
>>>
>>>My s71 register is set for async-sync PPP conversion, my s60 is set for
>>>64k. I'm using a known-good cable that supports flow control, and Kermit
>>>knows to use RTS/CTS. I've also experimented with using chat, and the
>>>output seems to show the same thing happening.
>>>
>>>To eliminate the Lavaport as a possibility, I swapped the ISDN modem with
>>>my analog modem after storing the correct hardware settings in EEROM. I
>>>got the same results on the other computer with the modem as the only
>>>common element, calling UUNet and my present ISP.
>>>
>>>Anyone have any tips? This is my first sortie with ISDN and I'm beginning
>>>to wonder whether there's something wrong with the modem itself.
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance for any help!
>>>
>>>Dave Klingler
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: 386 and cable modem
Date: 13 Jan 1999 05:24:52 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Josh Rusko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I want to add a Linux box to my home network, as the internet connection
| running IP masq. would a 386/20 be able to keep up with
| masquerading/firewalling at cable modem speeds or would it cause a
| bottleneck in my internet connection? If so, what is the minimum speed
| you would recommend to use with a cable modem (assuming ~1.5Mbps)
If you are just running one net behind the router, and you compile with
"optimize as a router" you are unlikely to have problems, at least not
to notice. The bandwidth should handle T1 or even E1 (2.05Mb) and I'm
not sure what cable bandwidth is these days.
Don't decide you should have print/fileserver/backup/DNS on this machine
too!!
Keep your firewalling simple! I would flat reject any packet from the
cable open a socket (see -y) and call that a firewall. You really want
to drop ICMP redirects, too, not sure off the top of my head how to do
that and still let ping work...
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
"Too soon we grow old, and too late we grow smart" -Arthur Godfrey
------------------------------
From: "musician" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: WEIRD modem probs under RHL 5.1
Date: 12 Jan 1999 19:17:05 GMT
musician <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<01be3e5a$713aa4c0$9218b1cf@hacker-1>...
> Here's what happens:
> I load Seyon and it gives me an error message something like:
> Can't access /dev/modem - in use by thread [n]
> I <KILL> the thread, it gives the same error message again (with a
> different thread no., though), I <KILL> that thread, reload Seyon, it
dials
> & works correctly. BUT, when I try to have wzdial auto-config
(<wzdialconf
> /etc/wzdial.conf>), it can't find my modem. I even disabled my on-MB
> serial ports in the BIOS and set my modem's jumper to COM1 (ttyS0), and
it
> STILL won't work. Does anybody have a clue what's going on? I can't
> connect to the net! Yes, BTW, I am a new lUser.
> -Jeremy S.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Franklin Rouse)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Permitting users to start PPPD
Date: 12 Jan 1999 19:02:56 GMT
Reply-To: frouseATnortelDOTcom
In article <777rq5$eao$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>You might need to make pppd suid root and thats all.
>
>I would recommend creating a group that is allowed to dial-out as opposed
>to letting any user bring up the link. Heres an example using
>shadowed passwords.
>
>'groupadd -g 1005 dialout' (create the group)
>
>'usermod -u 1001 -g 1001 -G dialout,cdrom,floppy,audio myusername'
>(add yourself to the new group and any other groups you are a member of)
>
>'chgrp dialout /dev/ttyS3' (change the modem to device to the new group)
>'chmod g+rw,o-rwx /dev/ttyS3' (deny access to non-group members)
>
>'chgrp dialout /usr/sbin/pppd' (change group of pppd)
>'chmod g+x,o-rwx /usr/sbin/pppd' (make it executable by group only)
>'chmod u+s /usr/sbin/pppd' (make it suid root)
>
>Now members of the group dialout should be able to bring up the link.
>
>Hope this helps,
>Dave
Hello,
I have tried the above and it does not work for my setup. Keep in
mind that I have three network connections (work and 2 ISP's) so I
must use the "name" parameter in pppd. Any time I attempt to set the
userid of the script that launches ppp and try the script from a user
other than root I receive the message that the name option only works
when the user is root.
Does anyone know of a work around to this type of problem besides
the sudo option? I have just recently installed sudo and it does work
but what I would like to be able to do is to create user accounts that
dial into what ever network I specify when I log in. I am attempting
to automate the connection so that my wife will be able to use linux
without linux getting in her way.
Cheers
#include <std.disclaimer> "Life is a tragedy for those who feel,
Frank Rouse and a comedy for those who think."
frouseATnortelDOTcom Research Triangle Park, NC - Jean de la Bruyere
--
Frank Rouse Patch Tools Design
ESN 355-3013
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,alt.linux
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP: Setting up a DIAL-IN PPP SERVER on my Linux box??
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:10:47 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I know others have probably asked, but I'm not sure so I'll
> ask.....Does anyone know how to set up a Dial-In PPP Server on a Linux
> Machine so i can dial into it from afar and get tcp/ip routing to work
> with it??? Sort of like having a single user ISP going on, ya know? If
> anyone can help, thanks in advance, if not......ask someone who might
> know AND thanks in advance...or something
Kindly look at the HOWTOs at http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
From: "Doug Hardman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PostgreSQL setup problems
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:28:57 -0500
group,
I'm trying to set up a PostgreSQL server under RedHat 5.2 (intel) and having
a lot of problems. I installed from the RPM, and I'm not sure that it got
everything. It's telling me that it can't connect to "template1" and when I
go to look for "template1" it's nowhere to be found.
I'm not sure that it's starting up, because if I do a "top" or "netstat", I
can't see it anywhere in the list.
When I log in and type "postmaster" I get this...
_____
[doug@gorf doug]$ postmaster
postmaster does not know where to find the database system data. You must
specify the directory that contains the database system either by specifying
the -D invocation option or by setting the PGDATA environment variable.
No data directory -- can't proceed.
_____
I decided to dig a little deeper, and ended up in the contrib directory of
the documentation. I found there a "postgres.init" file which I proceeded to
execute. The results were less than helpfull...
_____
[doug@gorf linux]$ ./postgres.init start
Starting postgres: Password:
su: incorrect password
postmaster []
_____
I didn't know that I needed a password?
psql was my next attempt, as I thought that maby it COULD be running, and me
not know it.
_____
[doug@gorf linux]$ psql
Connection to database 'doug' failed.
connectDB() failed: Is the postmaster running and accepting connections at
'UNIX
Socket' on port '5432'?
_____
Nope.....
anyone have any ideas?????
-Doug
--
=====================<>=]|[========] Douglas Hardman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] AMG Advertising & PR, Inc.
http://www.accessamg.com Resident Cyber Samurai
216-621-1835 Cleveland, OH
------------------------------
From: "Fulton B. Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: File and Samba Write Permissions
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 20:24:54 +0000
I have some FAT drives, which are mounted on /mnt/cdrive - /mnt/fdrive,
which I'd like to have read and write access to, both as an ordinary
user, and also from a Windows 98 PC networked to my Linux box under
Samba. How do I change Linux and Samba file permissions so I can do
this? That is, how do I invoke chmod so that /mnt/cdrive is
readable/writable by a given non-root user, and similarly, what do I put
in smb.conf to make this drive readable/writable?
--
Fulton B. Gonzalez Phone: (617) 627-2368
Department of Mathematics Fax: (617) 627-3966
Tufts University Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Medford, MA 02155
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roteus)
Subject: Need help with PPP (Invalid protocol error)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 06:33:31 GMT
I've got pppd setup using chat and the chap-secrets is setup that gets
authenticated but then it gives me an invalid protocol 8702.. the
syslog entries follow.
Jan 12 22:18:11 famvid pppd[504]: pppd 2.3.3 started by root, uid 0
Jan 12 22:18:12 famvid chat[506]: abort on (BUSY)
Jan 12 22:18:12 famvid chat[506]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Jan 12 22:18:12 famvid chat[506]: send (AT&F^M^M)
Jan 12 22:18:12 famvid chat[506]: expect (OK)
Jan 12 22:18:12 famvid chat[506]: AT&F^M^M^M
Jan 12 22:18:12 famvid chat[506]: OK
Jan 12 22:18:12 famvid chat[506]: -- got it
Jan 12 22:18:12 famvid chat[506]: send (AT&D2&C1^M^M)
Jan 12 22:18:13 famvid chat[506]: expect (OK)
Jan 12 22:18:13 famvid chat[506]: ^M
Jan 12 22:18:13 famvid chat[506]: AT&D2&C1^M^M^M
Jan 12 22:18:13 famvid chat[506]: OK
Jan 12 22:18:13 famvid chat[506]: -- got it
Jan 12 22:18:13 famvid chat[506]: send (ATD544-0387^M^M)
Jan 12 22:18:13 famvid chat[506]: expect (name:)
Jan 12 22:18:13 famvid chat[506]: ^M
Jan 12 22:18:33 famvid chat[506]: ATD???-????^M^M
Jan 12 22:18:33 famvid chat[506]: CONNECT 28800/ARQ^M
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: ^M
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: ^M
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: User Access Verification^M
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: ^M
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: Username:
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: -- got it
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: send ??????^M^M)
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: expect (sword:)
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: ??????^M
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: Password:
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: -- got it
Jan 12 22:18:34 famvid chat[506]: send (??????^M^M)
Jan 12 22:18:35 famvid pppd[504]: Serial connection established.
Jan 12 22:18:36 famvid pppd[504]: Using interface ppp0
Jan 12 22:18:36 famvid pppd[504]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Jan 12 22:18:45 famvid pppd[504]: CHAP peer authentication succeeded
for ????????
Jan 12 22:18:46 famvid pppd[504]: Unsupported protocol (0x8207)
received
Jan 12 22:18:46 famvid pppd[504]: Peer is not authorized to use remote
address xxx.xx.xx.xxx
Jan 12 22:18:46 famvid pppd[504]: Connection terminated.
Jan 12 22:18:47 famvid pppd[504]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Jan 12 22:18:47 famvid pppd[504]: Exit.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
btw. if it's not too much trouble could you send any responses to my
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks.
------------------------------
From: Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Q: Network Linux and OpenDOS ?
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 00:01:54 -0500
Mike Hall wrote:
>
> I've got two systems, they both run Linux, but sometimes I run
> OpenDOS on the smaller one. Can I use Samba to let the OpenDOS
> system talk with the other Linux system? (to avoid a floppy-net)
Nope, OpenDos uses a Novell client, with IPX/SPX. But there are some
IPX servers out there, check out the IPX-HOWTO for more info.
(remove FREAK...)
=======================================================================
Mike Stella Software / Systems Engineer
http://www.sector13.org/kazin Thirteen Technologies, LLC
=======================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Barnett)
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL setup problems
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 08:20:34 GMT
In article <77gbak$3va$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Doug Hardman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm trying to set up a PostgreSQL server under RedHat 5.2 (intel) and having
>a lot of problems. I installed from the RPM, and I'm not sure that it got
>everything. It's telling me that it can't connect to "template1" and when I
>go to look for "template1" it's nowhere to be found.
>
>I'm not sure that it's starting up, because if I do a "top" or "netstat", I
>can't see it anywhere in the list.
>
>When I log in and type "postmaster" I get this...
>_____
>[doug@gorf doug]$ postmaster
>postmaster does not know where to find the database system data. You must
>specify the directory that contains the database system either by specifying
>the -D invocation option or by setting the PGDATA environment variable.
>
>No data directory -- can't proceed.
The problem seems to lie with the setup. I would suggest going through the
postgreSQL manuals. You can find more information at
http://www.postgresql.org//
>From the information here, it seems you don't have the environment setup for
postgreSQL. Also, you may not have a database administrator account setup
(usually you create one called postgres). The manual will guide you through
this. It is also a good idea to create a separate account. Don't run
postgreSQL as root as this creates a possible security hole in your system.
The account should have environment variables setup for postgreSQL - such as
where to find data and so on. I give an example that I have in the postgres
profile.
PATH=${PATH}:/opt/pgsql/bin
MANPATH=${MANPATH}:/opt/pgsql/man
PGLIB=/opt/pgsql/lib
PGDATA=/opt/pgsql/data
export PGLIB PGDATA MANPATH
You would need to find out where your installation has placed the postgreSQL
directories and modify my example as necessary.
Having set this up, and if running postmaster does not work, then you probably
need to initialise the system. To do this, you need to run initdb.
If you then run postmaster (preferably in the background), it should start up
ok. The recommendation is generally:
nohup postmaster -S -i >> /opt/pgsql/server.log 2>&1 &
or something like that - so you get an server log from postmaster.
postmaster is the postgreSQL 'listener'. Running with the '-i' option means
that you can access it over a network (e.g. Connect to it via ODBC). Refer to
the man page for more information.
>psql was my next attempt, as I thought that maby it COULD be running, and me
>not know it.
>_____
>[doug@gorf linux]$ psql
>Connection to database 'doug' failed.
>connectDB() failed: Is the postmaster running and accepting connections at
>'UNIX
> Socket' on port '5432'?
>_____
>
>Nope.....
Without postmaster running, you will not be able to connect to a postgreSQL
database (psql is a simple frontend that allows you to do things like
maintenance, simple queries and that kind of thing; like Oracle's svrmgrl)
Please look through the postgreSQL administrator's guide as this covers in
greater depth the setup and care for your postgreSQL installation.
Best regards,
JonB.
P.S. This isn't really a networking question. :)
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 23:21:48 -0800
From: Derek Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! Connection refused!!
possibly tcpd is not set up to allow you to connect from a remote machine.
Check hosts.allow and hosts.deny
man pages
man tcpd
man hosts_access
man hosts_options
note that redhat and slackware linux ship with a sligtly defective hosts.deny file.
The deny part works, but the notification part
doesn't work. after the ALL : ALL keywords, you might need to put the keyword "spawn"
before the shell command you want executed
(usually piping the results of safe_finger to the mailer)
Cheers!
d.
Perus wrote:
> I don't understand... I'm trying to connect to my server with telnet, but it
> says connection refused. Now it IS online, I pinged it and it responded. But
> I can't get in. Also all services, FTP, HTTP are down.
> Please help, it has been working fine before!
> The server is agrippa.ifl.lu.
>
> If you reply by e-mail, reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], please
>
> Jussi Saarivirta
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Derek Shaw
Business Information Systems
Victoria, BC.
voice: 250-885-2021 fax: 250-386-4060
------------------------------
From: Joe McCorkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: speed within SubNet
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:46:41 -0600
I have a cable modem with Redhat 5.1 and the same goes for a guy on the
same subnet.
My ip is xxx.xxx.xxx.118
His ip is xxx.xxx.xxx.158
The xxx indicates the same #'s. My subnet mask is 255.255.254.0. His is
255.255.255.0. Is there a problem here? Both our gateways are
xxx.xxx.xxx.1 and nameservers are the same as well. It seems that I can
connect to other cable modems out of my subnet at 500Kb/s speeds, but I
can only connect to him at 2.5K/s max!!!!! This does not seem right!!!
Any help would be appreciated
Joseph McCorkle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Eigil Bjorgum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Token ring
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 22:31:55 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all.
By some coincidence I turned out to try helping some people to install
Linux (RH 5.2). Unfortunately I discovered that I have to hook the box
to a token ring LAN. So here I am, stuck with a 3com 3C359 PCI card and
no driver. Anyone out there who can point to a driver for that card? As
a resort I can buy another card, but rather not. Any advice is
appreciated.
Best regards,
Eigil
------------------------------
From: "waxhead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Invalid argument
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 07:45:59 GMT
I am running redhat 5.2 on a DEC alphastation 200 4/233
I have installed a second NIC in the system(the box comes with a nic
installed)
I have compiled and compiled and compiled kernels for the last two months.
Have set all the options for firewalling, ipforwarding and all that good
stuff I have read in just about every HOW-TO's I can find of networking,
firewalling, ppp, ipforwarding, net3, kernel, alpha, etc......
I have eth0 connected to my internal network here at my house. (192.168.0.5)
eth1 is connected to a cable modem with the cox @home ISP. (24.1.aaa.bb)
eth1 is setup with DHCP, The DHCP fails at boot but I have entered a command
line in the /etc/rc.d/rc.local file to start the DHCP service to eth1
The problem I am having is when I try to the following command
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
I get the error message
ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Invalid argument
I have followed evrything in the HOW-TO's on kernels, net3, PPP, ISP,
ip-forwarding,firewalling.
Here is the end of my rc.local file.
echo "ip_masq 192.168.0.5"
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
/sbin/depmod -a
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_raudio.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_irc.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_cuseeme.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_vdolive.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_quake.o
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
/sbin/route add -net 192.168.0.0
But the next to last line fails with the error I showed above.
The only way I can get ip-forwarding to work is to type
ipfwadm -F -p masquerade
AAAARRHHHHH........I don't think I want this like this..
Thanks in advance for any help on this.
Christopher
------------------------------
From: Dirk Thomalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading and MSIE
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 22:48:01 +0100
Juergen Fiedler wrote:
>
>
> The only programs that doesn't work are the Microsoft
> ones, like MSIE and Outlook.
It's not a bug, it's a feature! ;-)
Get rid off the M$ stuff, that's it.
--
- Dirk
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
