Linux-Networking Digest #936, Volume #9 Tue, 19 Jan 99 09:14:00 EST
Contents:
Re: Reconnection after WWW session terminates: WHY ? (Brian McCauley)
Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (M. Buchenrieder)
Which processes listen on which ports ? (Joerg Klaas)
Re: Linux and winNT callback ... PPP doesn't work.. why ? (Diederick van Dijk)
Re: running smtp server and pop3 server on same machine ? (Joerg Klaas)
Re: Simple networking questions (Brian McCauley)
Re: Finger info, hostname (Brian McCauley)
Re: Routing problems ... (Chris)
Re: Simple networking questions (Peter Farmer)
Re: forwarding, masquerading, firewalling?????? (Michael Schwager)
Re: Tricky network problem (using loopback?) (Sam Clayton)
Re: ppp-on doesn't respond (Clifford Kite)
Re: A little newbie help... seeing Win95 shares in Linux (Ben Sandler)
anyone, anywhere, got dhcp-2_0b1pl6 to work? (Daddy Rabbit)
Re: Machine denys telnet and FTP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NFS problem from Solaris client to Linux server (Fernand Jacinto)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Reconnection after WWW session terminates: WHY ?
Date: 19 Jan 1999 12:27:43 +0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I have my ISP configured with ppp under ISDN. Mail and news are still not
> working perfectly, but Netscape works almost ok. Two points are obvious:
>
> 1. When I open Netscape and try to connect the first time, this failes. Reload
> works, and all other www traffic too.
Demand dial and dynamic IP? The connection that starts the link now
has the wrong source IP address.
To enable work-round do:
echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr
> 2. After I have terminated the Netscape session, the connection is terminated
> after 60 seconds, as I configured it, BUT after another 60 sec interval there is
> a reconnection on the www port (80) for no reason ! This continues in cycles.
> Not good for my nerves and for my telephone bill ! Who knows the trick ?
Dunno about this one. It may be related.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,redhat.networking.general,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:07:18 GMT
[Newsgroups: slightly trimmed, F'Up set]
Daryle Niedermayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Urgh.
[...]
In another posting in this thread, I already stated that I overlooked
your statement about the added entry. The first paragraph of your original
posting was a bit misleading. My apologies.
>About WU-FTP. Thanks Barry for restating my point with such clarity. IMHO,
>WU-FTP should not be allowing openings that the shells deny.
[...]
Last try:
a) On a system with shadow password enabled, an empty string in the
password field in /etc/passwd (and no entry in /etc/shadow)
will let you login without a password prompt.
b) You can't login via telnet as root due to the standard security
precautions that prevent logins with EUID 0 (aka root) via the network
(/etc/securetty) .
c) WU-FTPD doesn't look into /etc/securetty . Why should it ? It doesn't
open a tty at all. Therefor, FTPD doesn't reject root logins that way.
Fact: Your system has been compromised. Backup your vital data and
reinstall , using the latest RH edition and the updates from the errata
page .
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't mungle your address.
------------------------------
From: Joerg Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Which processes listen on which ports ?
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 07:28:12 +0100
Does anyone know an easy way to find out, which processes are listening
on which port ?
I'm thinking about a combination of "netstat -na" and "ps -xla".
If my problem is still not clear:
"netstat" gives me a list of open/possible connections.
"ps -xa" gives me a list of processes
How can I link this two outputs together ?
Thanks, Joerg.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diederick van Dijk)
Subject: Re: Linux and winNT callback ... PPP doesn't work.. why ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:06:42 GMT
"PeP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have exactly the same problem.
Have you solved this problem yet ?
If so, can you email me the solution.
Thanks,
Diederick van Dijk
(remove nospam from my email adres)
>hi,
>
>I configured my linux box to connect to a NT RAS server with the callback
>abilities. I know I get authenticated the first time. (I call my server, it
>authenticates me .. and it call me back)
>My modem answers the call, and around 30 seconds later, my modem hangs hup
>and it seems there wasn't any ppp device created
>
>Here follow the log of my connexion :
>
>an 17 18:39:15 darkvador pppd[393]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: send (^MAT^M)
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: expect (OK)
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: ^MAT^M^M
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: OK
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: -- got it
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: send (ATH0^M)
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: expect (OK)
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: ^M
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: ATH0^M^M
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: OK
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: -- got it
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: send (ATDT5555555^M)
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: expect (CONNECT)
>Jan 17 18:39:16 darkvador chat[395]: ^M
>Jan 17 18:39:34 darkvador chat[395]: ATDT55555555^M^M
>Jan 17 18:39:34 darkvador chat[395]: CONNECT
>Jan 17 18:39:34 darkvador chat[395]: -- got it
>Jan 17 18:39:34 darkvador chat[395]: send (^M)
>Jan 17 18:39:34 darkvador pppd[393]: Serial connection established.
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: Using interface ppp0
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><callback 0x605> 06 00 00 3e fa 07 02 08 02 00]
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth chap 80> <magic 0x394d> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 06 4e> < 13 17 01 ac
>2d 70 50 a8 10 11 d2 bc 40 00 a0 24 aa af 14 00 00 00 00>]
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x0 < 11 04 06 4e>
>< 13 17 01 ac 2d 70 50 a8 10 11 d2 bc 40 00 a0 24 aa af 14 00 00 00 00>]
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><callback 0x605> 06 00 00 3e fa 07 02 08 02 24]
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth chap 80> <magic 0x394d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth chap 80> <magic 0x394d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: cbcp_lowerup
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: want: 14
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: rcvd [CHAP Challenge id=0xab
><0dcc3435aad6fcd7>, name = ""]
>Jan 17 18:39:35 darkvador pppd[393]: sent [CHAP Response id=0xab
><00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000012d6d4be3db512f481c36737f25
>d5b5eb2c332348e826b4501>, name = "ANDROMEDA\\PP"]
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: rcvd [CHAP Success id=0xab ""]
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: cbcp_open
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: rcvd [CBCP Request id=0x1 <
>AdminDefined delay = 0>]
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: length: 3
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: user admin defined allowed
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: cbcp_resp cb_type=8
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: cbcp_resp CONF_ADMIN
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: sent [CBCP Response id=0x1 <
>AdminDefined delay = 5 number = >]
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: rcvd [CBCP Ack id=0x1 < AdminDefined
>delay = 5 number = >]
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "Call me back,
>please"]
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
>Jan 17 18:39:36 darkvador pppd[393]: Connection terminated.
>Jan 17 18:39:37 darkvador pppd[393]: Exit.
>Jan 17 18:39:40 darkvador pppd[397]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
>Jan 17 18:39:41 darkvador chat[398]: expect (RING)
>Jan 17 18:39:52 darkvador chat[398]: ^M
>Jan 17 18:39:52 darkvador chat[398]: RING
>Jan 17 18:39:52 darkvador chat[398]: -- got it
>Jan 17 18:39:52 darkvador chat[398]: send (ATA^M)
>Jan 17 18:39:52 darkvador chat[398]: expect (CONNECT)
>Jan 17 18:39:52 darkvador chat[398]: ^M
>Jan 17 18:40:07 darkvador chat[398]: ATA^M^M
>Jan 17 18:40:07 darkvador chat[398]: CONNECT
>Jan 17 18:40:07 darkvador chat[398]: -- got it
>Jan 17 18:40:07 darkvador chat[398]: send (c^M)
>Jan 17 18:40:07 darkvador pppd[397]: Serial connection established.
>Jan 17 18:40:08 darkvador pppd[397]: Using interface ppp0
>Jan 17 18:40:08 darkvador pppd[397]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
>Jan 17 18:40:08 darkvador pppd[397]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <callback
>0x605> 06 00 00 9f fe 07 02 08 02 00]
>Jan 17 18:40:26 darkvador last message repeated 6 times
>Jan 17 18:40:29 darkvador pppd[397]: Modem hangup
>Jan 17 18:40:29 darkvador pppd[397]: Connection terminated.
>Jan 17 18:40:30 darkvador pppd[397]: Exit.
>
>I don't understand why there is a callback fields in the log when my modem
>answers the call ...
>
>Here follows the script and the option files I used to connect to the RAS
>server (/etc/ppp/scripts/ppp-on):
>
>/usr/sbin/pppd debug file /etc/ppp/options /dev/modem 115200
>sleep 3
>/usr/sbin/pppd debug file "/etc/ppp/options-callback" /dev/modem 115200
>
>
>/etc/ppp/options :
>------------------------
>proxyarp
>asyncmap 0
>crtscts
>#modem
>lock
>#passive
>#-ac
>debug
>-d
>lcp-max-configure 40
>lcp-max-terminate 40
>lcp-max-failure 40
>ipcp-max-terminate 40
>ipcp-max-configure 40
>name "ANDROMEDA\\PP"
>remotename ""
>#ms-dns 172.28.0.1
>#-pc
>#-vj
>noipdefault
>callback 1
>connect 'chat -v "" \rAT "OK-+++\c-OK" ATH0 OK ATDT5555555 CONNECT ""'
>nodetach
>
>
>/etc/ppp/options-callback :
>------------------------------------
>connect 'chat -v RING ATA CONNECT "\c"'
>defaultroute
>proxyarp
>default-asyncmap
>#nomagic
>crtscts
>modem
>lock
>passive
>#-ac
>debug
>-d
>lcp-max-configure 40
>lcp-max-terminate 40
>lcp-max-failure 40
>ipcp-max-terminate 40
>ipcp-max-configure 40
>ipcp-accept-remote
>ipcp-accept-local
>name "ANDROMEDA\\PP"
>remotename ""
>#ms-dns 172.28.0.1
>#-pc
>#-vj
>#callback 0
>
>
>I don't know what to do ...
>
>PeP
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
From: Joerg Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.misc,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: running smtp server and pop3 server on same machine ?
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:31:37 +0100
Well, actually this is the default configuration of nearly all linux (if
not all Unix variations) distributions.
There's nothing special to take care of.
SMTP and POP3 do not really interact directly with eachother.
POP3 is only beeing used by clients to read mails, while SMTP is usually
only used for sending post, as well as for general server to server mail
transfers.
Joerg
e-account wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to run both smtp and pop3 servers on the same machine?
> If so, are they able to transfer mail from the one to the other?
> We seem to have some problem to implement it.
>
> Feel free to comment.
>
> Thanks
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Simple networking questions
Date: 19 Jan 1999 12:48:38 +0000
Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Im looking for commands which can do the following.
>
> DNS an ip adddres and vice versa. (ie putting in a host name will
> producde the IP and vice versa)
gethostbyname() and gethostbyaddr(). (Or at the command line use
host, dig, or nslookup).
> Find out exactly what connections are connected to my machine.
netstat -ta
> EG, if someone is pinging me 64 k blocks of data, I want to know
> their IP address.
ICMP is connectionless so knowing connections won't help.
Looking in /proc/net/rt_cache will show you what IP addresses your
machine has recently been talking to. You can get the "iproute"
program to ake this more readable.
This information is probably useless as only a complete idiot would
launch a DoS attack without spoofing their IP source address.
You need to get the ISP admins involved.
> Computer running under Linux 2.0.35
I've never looked into the IP accounting facilities but they may help.
I think there's a way to have entries from the route cache passed to
some user space process before they are deleted - but I may be
dreaming.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Finger info, hostname
Date: 18 Jan 1999 17:48:01 +0000
"Perus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to change the hostname length shown in finger in my linux system.
> How do I do this?
Change the defintion of UT_HOSTSIZE /usr/include/utmp.h.
In fact the code is already in there for a new improved utmp but it's
ifdef'd out.
Then just recompile your libc and anything else that may include
utmp.h.
This is, of course, impractical.
More realistically you could probably modify the finger to call
gethostbyaddr() on the value in the ut_addr field of struct utmp.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: Routing problems ...
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 18:38:57 GMT
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:57:23 -0400, Daniel Tyrode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in comp.os.linux.networking:
>machine1:
>IP: 150.185.162.129
>NETMASK: 255.255.255.192
>IP network: 150.185.162.128
>Broadcast: 150.185.162.191
>machine2:
>IP: 150.185.162.193
>Netmask: 255.255.255.192
>IP network: 150.185.162.192
>Broadcast: 150.185.162.255
>machine3: ( router and gateway to the outside )
>IP: 150.185.162.29
>Netsmask: 255.255.255.128
>IP network: 150.185.162.0
>Broadcast: 150.185.162.127
>
>This last machine has three ethernet cards, one that goes to machine1
>another that goes to machine2 and a third one that goes to the principal
>gateway ( in this case a computer with an IP 150.185.162.1 ) that exits
>to the Internet.
Machine 3 would therefore have three IP addresses, with the one listed
representing the interface that connects to the router. What are the
other two?
>For some reason, machine1 and machine2 can get conected with each other
>through machine 3, and they can also get conected with machine3.
>Unfortunatelly I have been unable to establish conection from any
>machine1 or machine2 to the principal gateway (150.185.162.1) thus the
>outside, although machine3 has normal access to the outside.
The fact that machines one and two can talk means that you have most of
the hard stuff done. Your problem is probably confined to the firewall
rules and/or the route instructions. We need more information about your
server's configuration. The output of the following would help:
route -n
ipfwadm -l -I -n
ipfwadm -l -F -n
ipfwadm -l -O -n
------------------------------
From: Peter Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Simple networking questions
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:02:34 +0000
==============79E96AC9D70515532656E5BD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Rob wrote:
> Hello
>
> Im looking for commands which can do the following.
>
> DNS an ip adddres and vice versa. (ie putting in a host name will
> producde the IP and vice versa)
> and
> Find out exactly what connections are connected to my machine. EG, if
> someone is pinging me 64 k blocks of data, I want to know their IP
> address.
>
> Can anyone help?
>
> Cheers
> Rob
>
> --
>
> Computer running under Linux 2.0.35
>
> Rob Barnes
> ICQ : 2224468
> Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web Page : Brother wrecked it, last time I let him use FTP..
> Go to : www.unix-vs-nt.org/kirch/ for an education...
Try the host command,
$ host www.redhat.com
$ host 199.183.24.253
assuming you have a dns server configured in your /etc/resolv.conf this
should work
if you don't have you resolv.conf configured properly add some lines like
this
search domain.net
nameserver <ip-address>
--
Peter Farmer
Product Support
Simon Murby Associates
Tel +44 (0) 171 960 2900 - Fax +44 (0) 171 960 2901
http://www.sma.uk.com
==============79E96AC9D70515532656E5BD
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
Rob wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>Hello
<P>Im looking for commands which can do the following.
<P>DNS an ip adddres and vice versa. (ie putting in a host name will
<BR>producde the IP and vice versa)
<BR>and
<BR>Find out exactly what connections are connected to my machine.
EG, if
<BR>someone is pinging me 64 k blocks of data, I want to know their IP
<BR>address.
<P>Can anyone help?
<P>Cheers
<BR>Rob
<P>--
<P>Computer running under Linux 2.0.35
<P>Rob Barnes
<BR>ICQ : 2224468
<BR>Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<BR>Web Page : Brother wrecked it, last time I let him use FTP..
<BR>Go to : www.unix-vs-nt.org/kirch/ for an education...</BLOCKQUOTE>
Try the host command,
<BR>$ host www.redhat.com
<BR>$ host 199.183.24.253
<P>assuming you have a dns server configured in your /etc/resolv.conf this
should work
<BR>if you don't have you resolv.conf configured properly add some lines
like this
<P>search domain.net
<BR>nameserver <ip-address>
<PRE>--
Peter Farmer
Product Support
Simon Murby Associates
Tel +44 (0) 171 960 2900 - Fax +44 (0) 171 960 2901
<A HREF="http://www.sma.uk.com">http://www.sma.uk.com</A></PRE>
</HTML>
==============79E96AC9D70515532656E5BD==
------------------------------
From: Michael Schwager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: forwarding, masquerading, firewalling??????
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 14:31:41 -0800
Thanks a lot. So far in one day I have not been assigned a new ip address. I
will use the subnet method instead of having the dhcpc server calling the
script.
Two new problems:
1. Last night, my LAN hosts were able to get on the net and web browse even
though I could not ping to an internet host by name (I had to use the ip
address). Today, for some stupid reason, I can't even browse. I can load up a
web page by typing in the ip of the site, but that's it. Something to do with
nameservers I'm sure. I didn't change anything on the windows-host (LAN) end,
I'm sure. I used tcpdump and saw that when netscape loaded up on a host on the
LAN, NOTHING came through to either network card. I just used tcpdump in
default mode so it was supposed to see everything coming. So for some reason
netscape isn't even asking the linux machine to go look for things. When I ping
from a LAN host to something, like scf.usc.edu, tcpdump reports this:
mindwalker.netbios-ns > 10.10.10.255.netbios-ns: udp 50
and the overall ping doesn't work. I don't know if these two issues pinging and
web browsing) are related.
2. Last night, when browsing was working, ICQ didn't work from the LAN hosts
either. I'm not sure if that's because of the nameserving problem or because of
more involved proxy/firewall issues having to do with icq.
Any and all help is much appreciated :)
michael
------------------------------
From: Sam Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Tricky network problem (using loopback?)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:15:11 +0000
In message <7802k9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"rkv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Can you ping interface itself (192.168.1.1)?
Yes, with 0 packet loss. AFAIR this also increases the Tx/Rx packets on
the loopback entry (as given by ifconfig)
> 2. All your computers have to be on the same subnet (192.168.1.0/24).
yes 192.168.1.2 (AKA frodo) can ping 192.168.1.3 (AKA samwise) and
vice-verca, they can also exchange files etc.
'pinging' 192.168.1.1 (AKA gandalf) fails from both other machines.
the failed 'pings' don't give the error 'network is unreachable' (or
whatever) they just sit there. (I left it for 20 minutes and still
nothing)
'pings' into 192.168.1.1 make the traffic led flash on the back of the
machine.
'pings' from 192.168.1.1 don't produce any visable effect.
> 3. Try "route" and see what does it say (at least has to show the route to
> 192.168.1.0 through 192.168.1.1 on eth0).
'route -n' gives:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
Should the gateway on the first entry be 192.168.1.1?
is this set in the routes.conf file (SuSE distribution)
> 4. Check /proc/routes
>
>
>
Mihai Petre suggested:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mihai Petre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I had this problem.Me too I had an answer from this group.
> > U should type (or add those 2 lines in your rc.local)
> > route add 192.168.1.1
> > route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
> >
> > Mihai
> >
This didn't work.
Cheers,
Sam
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ppp-on doesn't respond
Date: 18 Jan 1999 16:18:17 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I'm using Slackware 3.5 to create a ppp connection, but ppp-on won't
: even dial my modem. I know the modem works because I use minicom to
: create VT100 connections.
: I read the PPP-HOWTO and created ppp-on and ppp-on-dialer scripts.
: ppp-on-dialer looks like this:
: #!/bin/sh
: exec /usr/sbin/chat -v \
: TIMEOUT 3 \
: ABORT '\nBUSY\r' \ \
: ABORT '\nNO ANSWER\r' \ \
: ABORT '\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r' \ \
: '' \rAT \\
: 'OK-+++\c-OK' ATH0 &K3 E1 Q0 S0=0 &C1 &S0 \ \
: TIMEOUT 60 \\
: OK ATDT$TELEPHONE \ \
: CONNECT '' \\
: agon--agon ppp \
The first line above, beginning with TIMEOUT, has a space after the `\'
and if this is the case in the actual script, then delete the space.
The `\' is an escape for the end-of-line and there cannot be anything
between it and the end-of-line. And you should have only one `\' on
each line, *except* for the last line which should not have an escape.
If this fails to get you further along in the connection process, then
maybe it is something indigious to PCMICA - which I know nothing about.
: Jan 18 03:15:01 empire kernel: registered device ppp0
: Jan 18 03:15:01 empire pppd[134]: pppd 2.2.0 started by root, uid 0
: Jan 18 03:15:02 empire chat[137]: expect ( )
: Jan 18 03:15:47 empire chat[137]: alarm
This is a timeout alarm on the chat default timeout of 45 seconds.
Timeout alarms are a classic symptom of a bad chat script. The TIMEOUT
in your script should have generated a message and didn't do so, the
timeout was not changed to 3 seconds either.
: Jan 18 03:15:47 empire pppd[134]: Exit.
: Jan 18 03:15:47 empire chat[137]: Faile
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
------------------------------
From: Ben Sandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A little newbie help... seeing Win95 shares in Linux
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 00:27:06 +0000
Brian Newman wrote:
>
> I have a Win95 box and a Linux box ethernetted together. I have Samba up and
> running on Linux and I can share the Samba shares from Win95 with no problem.
> When I try to access one of the shares on the Win95 box from the Linux box, I
> get a message that RPC can't make a connection.
>
> This is when trying "mount -t nfs win95box:/c /mnt/win95box/c". Is that right?
No. nfs is for mounting other UNIX shares. It's a different program
entirely.
You want to use smbmount.
> I've tried "smbclient \\win95box\c" in just about every syntax I can and
> smbclient always tells me there aren't enough "\" in the parameter. How many do
> I need to put in and where?
smbclient is for looking at the share. smbmount is for actually
mounting it. You don't have enough slashes because backslashes ("\")
must be escaped. You do that by preceding it with a backslash, so \
would be \\. But no matter, because you can use forward slashes. So,
smbmount //win95box/c will do the trick.
>
> I checked out "man rpc", which tells me to run "rpc client foo bar" to engage
> the RPC client. Okay, but... the executable "rpc" is in my /sbin/init.d
> directory, and its only options are "rpc start" and "rpc stop", and it doesn't
> seem to help.
rpc is nfs stuff. Don't worry about it.
Hope that helps,
- Ben
>
> Any hints?
>
> --------------------
> Shade and sweet water,
> Brian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.aracnet.com/~bnewman
> "A small bullet, a piece of glass /
> And your heart just grows around it" -- Laurie Anderson, "Poison"
--
Ben Sandler
email me: sandler at ymail dot yu dot edu
"Windows is an operating system, not a religion."
- Ted Waitt, chairman of Gateway
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daddy Rabbit)
Subject: anyone, anywhere, got dhcp-2_0b1pl6 to work?
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:50:33 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have spent two days on this piece of work and it looks like I'm
going to have to start all over from the ground up and find another
version. If you have managed to get this )*&(*% thing to work using a
single network I sure would appreciate it if you would share a copy of
your dhcpd.conf.
Thanks
Jim
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Machine denys telnet and FTP
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 01:29:08 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scallica) wrote:
I am guessing that you are telneting out of the linux box to another box.
It might be that you have named your box xyy.isp.com and when you telnet out,
the remote system is checking to see what your reverse-dns looks like and it
finds out that it is dialup-052.isp.com and is denying you. Might look at
that.
If it is telneting in to your box, send a copy of the /var/log/secure messages
file.
shane.
> >> I am using Redhat 5.2 with a 3c509 card. The system is online. However,
> >> when I try to telnet or ftp to it, it finds the host, but keeps denying my
> >> connection
> >> and closes the telnet window. What could be wrong? Thanx.
> >>
> >Chech your /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny files.
> >--
> >Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> I did...hosts.deny is empty, and hosts.allow sez
> ALL: ALL....any other suggestions?
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Fernand Jacinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS problem from Solaris client to Linux server
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:09:25 +0100
Hi,
I am new in the Linux world... I am trying to put
Linux machine in our UNIX environment (SUN, HP and SGI).
I would like to set up Linux node as NFS server. It's
working correctly but sometimes i have the following message
in Solaris log file :
Jan 18 11:36:21 Solaris_node automountd[146]: No network locking on
linux_node : contact admin to install server change
When i have this error message, the acces to a file or directory
isn't possible. The very strange thing is that i can see the file
with a "ls" command but a simple touch and/or vi aren't ok. Futhermore,
the problem occur sometimes and not always...
What's wrong ?
Solaris nodes are under 2.5 or 2.5.1 and linux node under
Redhat 5.2.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Fernand.
PS : Could you answer me via E-mail too ?
--
Fernand Jacinto
Laboratoires d'Electronique Philips S.A.S
22 avenue Descartes, 94453 Limeil-Brevannes, France.
Phone : (33 1) 45106939, Fax : (33 1) 45106872
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
