Linux-Networking Digest #942, Volume #9 Tue, 19 Jan 99 20:13:37 EST
Contents:
Re: dhcpd problems - would appreciate your insight (Chris)
Login as root with telnet (Steve Ledford)
Re: This ongoing flame-fest ("DG")
Documentation for SAMBA? (bill davidsen)
MINICOM for PPP? (Brian Dudek)
Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+ ISA and Redhat 5.2 ("wayne m. eaker")
Re: smaba & win98 (Gustavo Gibson da Silva)
Unable to connect using PPP (Norm Dowds)
DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net (Tina)
Re: Connect without hub (Chris Cappuccio)
Re: Weird 3COM Card Problem - Help Please ("Todd A. Wood")
Re: ip-up problem (Clifford Kite)
Re: Samba and "Sendmail" on a notebook (bill davidsen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: dhcpd problems - would appreciate your insight
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:22:59 GMT
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:56:40 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daddy Rabbit)
wrote in comp.os.linux.networking:
>>>No subnet declaration for eth0 (0.0.0.0)
>I only have one NIC in the machine. I have tried every scenario I can
>think of and the best I can do is get this message. Since there are no
>subnets, only the one net, I don't get it.
Don't forget that you have to have a properly configured ethernet
interface *before* you launch dhcpd. Since you are issuing the IP
addresses, I assume you have a fixed address yourself. Simply put the
appropriate ifconfig statement in your network startup script.
------------------------------
From: Steve Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Login as root with telnet
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:48:35 -0600
I have a very annoying problem with my Linux (RH 5.1) setup at home. I
have setup an old PC as a print server/internet gateway. It is headless
(ie. no monitor) and I was planning on managing it across my LAN by
simply telnet'ing into the thing. Well, telnet works just fine but my
login as root is rejected every time. I can log in as one of the user
accounts I set up and I can then 'su' to root but this is flat out
annoying. What do I need to change on the box in order to enable root
login over telnet?
------------------------------
From: "DG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: This ongoing flame-fest
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 06:01:37 GMT
Yeah, well thanks for sharing your crap. Now go and stuff some vomit on your
face, pigfart !!!
Moriarty wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hey all...
>
>I personally like to read this and other Linux related newsgroups for the
>same reasons many of your others do: To learn from one another and help one
>another, if we are able of course... Unfortunatly, there is now a
flame-fest
>going on in this thread, and personally, I wish it would stop.
>
>I am not attempting to flame anyone on either the majority users or DG's
>side... I am just trying to clear the air... I mean, for many of us, USENET
>is more than just newgroups... USENET is a way of life... And, like in the
>real world, it is usually better for us to get along and become productive,
>than to always be angry and everything get destroyed in a heartbeat...
>
>To DG: I read your first post (the initial post that started this) that
>requested help from the members of these groups. I was going to respond to
>you, but I first (like usual) read the other people responses to your
>responses and, to be honest with you, after re-reading all the posts of
this
>thread over and over again, I fail to understand why you are so upset with
>us. In my opinion (and I'm sure yours and others will have differing ones),
I
>think many other people at first tried to help you find the easiest, least
>time-consuming way to solve your original problem. To be honest with you, I
>am all for the idea that one can log on to the net at any time and download
>either patches, updates, or the whole smoe of the Linux OS for free. The
fact
>that it was originally made available by Mr. Torvaldes in the source code
>format for free under the GPL is what has enable others and myself to
legally
>enhance and modify these sources and re-distribute them back on the net so
>that others, in whatever way they can, can benefit from the total sum of
our
>collective knowledge. Now, Mr. DG, I have collaborated with Microsoft
before
>on several projects and beta testing surveys, and I personally can tell you
>the frustration I felt when I needed to re-format my Windows partitions and
>do a complete re-install because of some renegade thread in a program which
>screwed it all up. I don't know about you, but if the only way you could
>restore Windows was to make a disk which has just the proper software,
tools,
>and drivers on it to just connect to your ISP, and then make the FTP
>connection each and every time the system dies, I think you would get
rather
>tired of repeating this task over and over again... I mean, a good complete
>software on Linux, in my opinion is over 500+ MB, and the basic Windows 98
>stuff is around what, 240 MB or so? And then, after you have spent the time
>required to download the software, then have to spend the time waiting to
>install it, you may be looking at several hours (based on the transfer
>figures you gave us at 500 MB/2 hours), and having a CD copy, in my humble
>opinion, would be a heckuva lot easier to keep on hand then to have to keep
>repeatedly downloading over and over again. When the earlier posters
>suggested that you make a purchase of one of the various CD-ROMS available,
>they were not trying to insult your intelligence, or take away your rights
as
>an Internet user - they (and I) were just speaking from the experience that
>years of tinkering and hassles of trying new things out has taught us. I
>believe one gentleman suggested you go to the Cheapbytes website
>(http://www.cheapbytes.com) and purchase the Linux distrubution for $1.99
>(w/Total shipping charges it comes to around $8.50 or so in US Dollars)...
>I honestly believe that these people were not trying to pick on you or
start
>a fight or deny you anything which you feel you are entitled to. I believe
>that they were under the impression from your posts that you had some past
>familarity with Linux (RedHat Distributions in particular) and were ready
to
>make the switch from Windows 9x as your primary OS to Linux. (I myself got
>that same impression after reading your initial posts based on how you were
>wanting to set up your hardware per your descriptions)... The reason why
they
>told you to buy the premade CD-ROM was to save you both time and money - I
>mean, didn't you yourself say that you didn't want to shell out the cash to
>get a CD-ROM burner? No offense to you, but in my opinion, $1.99 + shipping
>is *MUCH* *MUCH* cheaper than several hundred dollars for a *good*
>CD-ROM burner... I think maybe you mistook these other peoples posts as
being
>critical of you, when in fact (in my opinion) they were actually trying to
>save you some grief... Now, be honest with us here - when you first got to
>the point in your self-taught education, how many times did you get to the
>point where a re-install of Windows 9x was necessary? Several I bet. Now,
it
>is true, both of my opinion and of several millions of Linux users (and
>Microsoft also, according to their in-house memos) that Linux is far more
>stable an environment (especially for development and Net applications)
than
>Windows 9x / NT, but we also realize that nothing is ever perfect and that
>there is always the possibility of a crash or a major bug popping up where
a
>re-install of all systems maybe necessary. Now do you see why having a
backup
>CD-ROM would be desireable? I mean, all your drives are wiped: So, you
would
>have to 1. Set up Windwos 9x all over again. 2. Install the Internet FTP
>software 3. Configure the Net stuff 4. Dial-up/Connect and FTP all those
>hundreds of MB all over again... 5. Reboot and setup Linux... 6. Configure
>everything that you lost in the crash... 7. Fix every little minor detail
you
>may have missed... And so on and so on... With a CD-ROM, you could take a
>good two hours off of this process... Maybe you don't run a website (or
maybe
>you do), but I know that there are many on USENET who also double as
>webmasters and such, and if the servers are down, then they are losing
>money... Are you with me so far?
>
>Now, personally, I have no opinion on how you get your money or what you
>choose to do with it. if it is your money and you earned it, then you have
>ever right to do with it as you see fit. Same with what you choose to do
with
>your hardware and/or software you already own or already buy... If you were
>to decide to go out and buy a K7-500 Mhz CPU in 6 months or so, I would say
>more power to you, and I would support you in any way possible (as well as
be
>secertly envious :) The type of people who run OSes like Linux are the type
>of people who like to tinker, problem-solvers and developers who like to
get
>in and get their hands-dirty with new software and hardware, to push the
>technology envelope to the extreme (or as extreme as they can get)... In my
>opinion, if I am starting out on something brand new, and there is someone
>who obviously is more knowledgeable about it than me on it, I am most
>*defintely* going to try and learn from them or ask them their advise... I
>don't have to agree with it or do what they say... Nothing says that you
are
>obligated to what the members of this group suggest... (It is your money,
>your hardware, and your software, and your time, after all) We will not be
>offended in any way as long as you respect our rights to our opinions...
>Hopefully, most of the time we are right, or can point you in the direction
>to a place (A website, for example) where you can find it on your own...
But,
>like all things in life, sometimes we are wrong... But remember, the
>USENET is for anyone who has any ideas at all to come and participate and
>share what both the newer people are looking for, as well as gain
experience
>from the people who have more knowledge and familarity... But remember, at
>any time you are free to stop logging into your NNTP server... You don't
have
>to post... There will always be people who will disagree on anything with
>you, no matter what the subject... The fact that we are able to form
>different opinions independently from anyone else is what probably
seperates
>humankind from the lesser species on the planet... You know what I mean?
You
>came on this group posting a problem, and we responded (or at least some of
>us did) - I'm not quite sure why you became so upset... I am at a lost as
to
>why this thread even got started and continued...
>
>Maybe you are a natural-born troublemaker... These people do exist.
>But, since I know nothing about you, and I have never met you or
encountered
>you in my personal life to the best of my knowledge, I am going to treat
you
>with the same respect and dignity that I would give any person either on
here
>or in the real world... But, once you abuse that trust that people given
you,
>then it is usually *very* difficult, if not impossible, to regain what was
>lost, and build again from there...
>
>All I ask that before you launch your newsreader and flame me to the ends
of
>the Earth for this post, is that you try to see my side of it - our side
>maybe? - and realize that nobody was trying to tell you what to do... On
the
>net, nobody knows anything about anybody else until you yourself tell us,
and
>there are lots of ways that people can tell traits in other people...
Please
>also realize that many of the people on the USENET have been *very*
longterm
>Internet users (I myself have been online for over fifteen years now) and
>while we may be set in our weird little ways, on most technical topics, we
do
>know what we are talking about... Take it from those who know, and maybe
you
>will save time, money, resources, and maybe even more importantly, make
some
>new friends... Of course, and I am only going to say it once, you screw
>around with the wrong people, and it is quite possible that you will not be
>logging on for soem time without *quite* a bit of effort...
>DO YOU UNDERSTAND? Thank you. :)
>
>I hope that DG and anyone else who reads this message will send me some
>feedback on this, whether good or bad... I welcome all opinions - good,
bad,
>indifferent, or completely new fresh ones... :)
>
>Thank you for your time and for your attentive patience... Take care, and
>have a good day...
>
>Moriarty
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Documentation for SAMBA?
Date: 19 Jan 1999 18:34:05 GMT
Is there any overview documentation for SAMBA? Not the 80 or so things
I've found which deal with some tiny bits in painful detail? I need an
example of something *tiny* which will work. Not which needs to be
fitted to your situation, not change this to that, just flat makes any
one bit of filespace visible to the world, with a list of every file
needing to be changed and every file/click needed on Win95 to actually
see the data.
I can see filespace fine with smbclient, but Win95 doesn't see it. I'm
in a sort of complex network, with the client and server separated by a
router, and if SMB won't work over a router, then I see the problem.
Only the docs seem to indicate it will.
Inet === Linux router (2.1.132) --- PPP to other sites
/ \
192.168.22 x.x.x.x
class C 6 bit subnet
| |
client server
Again, if I boot "client" on Linux, smbclient works just fine, but
"Network Neighborhood" doesn't see the Linux server. I probably need to
do magic somewhere to tell the W95 machines about something, but I
don't have/need a master table for the W95 machines to see each other.
If it matters, the 6 bit subnet is official and visible on the net (with
firewall restrictions, of course). The private network is masqueraded.
Both the 6bit and private can use the net, can see each other
(telnet/ftp from W95 works), smbclient from Linux to W95 works. Both tcp
and udp packets are forwarded correctly, obviously. Ping works between
any two machines, so ICMP also works.
If there's an example, I'll put a W95 machine on the same subnet as the
client, configured as needed, and see if it's the setup or routing. But
not knowing if the setup is right, there are just too many places where
something could be upper or lower case, and where parts care and parts
don't. Documentation with "may need" doesn't help, conflicting
documents which tell me I must set something which another says I
shouldn't, or which insist that I need to use upper or lower case "as
appropriate" also don't help. I'd like to start with something working
and go from there until I see if it's setup or network.
The old SAMBA on my SCO box wasn't this picky, or by great chance I got
it right first time ;-) Unfortunately that's long gone or I wouldn't
have to ask.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
"Too soon we grow old, and too late we grow smart" -Arthur Godfrey
------------------------------
From: Brian Dudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MINICOM for PPP?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:45:55 -0700
Can minicom be used to start a ppp connection? If so, then once '~' and
stuff is returned, how do I make the connection available to the system?
If this will not work my problem my stem from my ISP's requirement to
have 'ppp' entered at the prompt after login and password. How can this
be scripted with minicom or chat or something better (easier) so users
other than root can use it.
If it matters, I'm on a RH5.0 box - and no RH's tool does not work
because 'ppp' is not/can not be passed - I guess?
Thanks
Brian
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "wayne m. eaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help,alt.os.linux
Subject: Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+ ISA and Redhat 5.2
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:39:26 -0500
I have tried and tried and tried to get this network card to work under
redhat. I have tried working with network configuration utilities that
come with redhat. I have recompiled the kernel. I have made eepro.o a
module and put it in the kernel. I have turned off the PnP and Flash
RAM memory on the card. Most of the time, I get no message at all at
boot time. However, the best I can do is get a message that says
"Delaying eth0 initialization." Then, it's still useless. Does anyone
have this card and has set it up successfully? Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Wayne Eaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Gustavo Gibson da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: smaba & win98
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:13:06 -0300
rbrewer wrote:
>
> My win98 machine sees the samba drive on my linux machine but always asks
> for a password which never works. I log onto the win machine with the same
> login and password as my linux machine (i.e.-root, "pwd"). I feel that there
> is something wrong on the win machine with tcp/ip setup but have gone
> through every setting with no luck. I have tried deleting the pwl files and
> restarting, etc. Any help would be appreciated. I recently changed from
> slackware to redhat 5.0 to avoid all the hassles of setting up ppp, network
> card and graphics. This seems like deja vue but that's what newsgroups are
> for.
> Thanks
This is due to the new feature of win98: do not accept plain-text
passwords by default. Go to this URL and follow the instructions:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q185/6/12.asp
Or enable encrypted passwords on samba (it means that you must create a
second authentication database).
Gustavo.
--
"La Femme partage nos peines,
double nos joies et triple
nos depenses."
------------------------------
From: Norm Dowds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Unable to connect using PPP
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:37:39 -0800
I am running Red Hat 5.2 and my modem is a Practical Peripherals 14.4 .
I am able to connect using Minicom to my ISP . The RAS responds as would
be expected . I have used the Control Panel ( under X ) configure PPP0
but upon activation , it does does not " dial " . The chat-ppp0 appears
consistent with the configuration input . Upon toggling the interface ,
both pppd and chat come up . Messages which are not entirely
uderstandable are sent to /var/..../log/messages and have been viewed
via tail .
As the configuration tool under Control Panel is straightforward and
Minicom indicates no modem problem I am stuck as to how to proceed
toward successfully accessing my ISP via PPP . Your help would be
appreciated .
N
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:38:29 GMT
Hello,
I have seen a ton of messages concerning setting up Linux for ADSL in
combination with having to use DHCP but none of them have helped me to solve
my problem. So, I am posting in hopes that someone out there has done the
same thing as I'm trying to do in a very very similar situation.
I am using ADSL through Bellsouth.net in the Birmingham, AL area. Under
Win95 everything is going great and working fine. When I tried setting up
Linux, I installed the dhcpcd (client, not dhcpd) but it's failing every time
I try to use it. I've followed the following suggestions with no luck yet:
1. added -h option to the call to specify hostname (used regular host name
and also the login name that I use for bellsouth.net). 2. added -r option 3.
tried the fixes suggested in the DHCP howto in the
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts 4. tried using the dhcpcd 1.3.17 and the 0.70
packages (rpms) 5. tried getting the source for dhcpcd 0.70 and also for
1.3.17 and recompiling them. - I did have a problem trying to compile 0.70
and gave up trying but 1.3.17 worked fine as far as compiling goes. 6. tried
beating a drum, burning stuff, and chanting to the gods.
I'm getting "no DHCPOFFER messages" in /var/log/messages whenever I run
dhcpcd.
Nothing has worked so far and I'm wondering if anyone else had gotten their
connection to work under Linux for BellSouth.net. I keep hearing about
everyone else's success and I keep trying to follow everyone else's advice,
but nothing ahs worked for me yet. I've even tried some obscure silly things
that my own mind drummed up...
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
- Darricke Rayl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Tina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 15:50:02 -0800
It may depend on what kernel version you are using. After kernel v2.1.something
the DHCPCD v0.70 will not work. I use a roadrunner cable modem, and I downloaded
a newer daemon "rrdhcpcd" and it worked.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have seen a ton of messages concerning setting up Linux for ADSL in
> combination with having to use DHCP but none of them have helped me to solve
> my problem. So, I am posting in hopes that someone out there has done the
> same thing as I'm trying to do in a very very similar situation.
>
> I am using ADSL through Bellsouth.net in the Birmingham, AL area. Under
> Win95 everything is going great and working fine. When I tried setting up
> Linux, I installed the dhcpcd (client, not dhcpd) but it's failing every time
> I try to use it. I've followed the following suggestions with no luck yet:
>
> 1. added -h option to the call to specify hostname (used regular host name
> and also the login name that I use for bellsouth.net). 2. added -r option 3.
> tried the fixes suggested in the DHCP howto in the
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts 4. tried using the dhcpcd 1.3.17 and the 0.70
> packages (rpms) 5. tried getting the source for dhcpcd 0.70 and also for
> 1.3.17 and recompiling them. - I did have a problem trying to compile 0.70
> and gave up trying but 1.3.17 worked fine as far as compiling goes. 6. tried
> beating a drum, burning stuff, and chanting to the gods.
>
> I'm getting "no DHCPOFFER messages" in /var/log/messages whenever I run
> dhcpcd.
>
> Nothing has worked so far and I'm wondering if anyone else had gotten their
> connection to work under Linux for BellSouth.net. I keep hearing about
> everyone else's success and I keep trying to follow everyone else's advice,
> but nothing ahs worked for me yet. I've even tried some obscure silly things
> that my own mind drummed up...
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> - Darricke Rayl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95
Subject: Re: Connect without hub
Date: 19 Jan 1999 23:40:39 GMT
What about the situation where you are connecting together two machines
via RJ45 ? Don't ethernet cards with 10bT interfaces rely on the hub
for collision detection? If a hub detects a collision, it sends out a signal
which causes the cards to retransmit...Otherwise packets are lost?
In comp.dcom.lans.ethernet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Rob Wiltbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, a hub is designed to to take packets and distribute them as best as
>> is can to their destination. You're more likely to have packets collide
>> on a peer to peer than through a hub.
> Perhaps I am wrong, but I thought a hub simply made the appropriate
> electrical connections. That is, to my knowledge, a hub does not
> deal with packets, only with electronics. (If it deals with packets
> and distributes them to their destinations appropriately, then it
> is probably a switch. Granted, one could say "hub" and mean
> "switching hub", but in those context (microhubs) that's probably
> not the idea.)
> So, in my understanding, you're *just* as likely to have packets
> collide on a two host network whether or not you have a hub.
> - Logan
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
--
More people have died in the last five minutes from alcohol and tobacco use
than have died from LSD and MDMA use in the history of the world.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 01:16:22 +0100
From: "Todd A. Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: Weird 3COM Card Problem - Help Please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> My problem with my 3COM problem continues, any help would be GREATLY
> APPRECIATTED
>
> Problem: System hangs during "boot" with new PCMCIA multi-function card.
> =======
>
> Background:
> ==========
>
> -IBM ThinkPad 600
> -Dual Booting Windows 5.2 and Macmillan RedHat 5.2 - new clean install
> -Trying for almost a week to get a new 3com 3CXEM556B to work.
> -Card installed great in WINDOWS, works perfectly, WINDOWS gave it IRQ 9,COM
> 3.
>
I have nearly the identical card / if not the same
To start, get an install pcmcia-cs.3.0.5+ (I am on 3.0.8)
/etc/pcmcia/config.opts
include port 0x2f8-0x2ff, port 0x120-0x12f, memory 0xa0000000-0xa0ffffff
# memory 0x09001000-0x09001fff, memory 0x09003000-0x09003fff #(Also
Works)
reserve irq 3
exclude irq 4, port 0x3f8-0x3ff, port 0x3e8-03ef, irq 7, irq 9, irq 5
module "3c589_cs" opts "irq_list=3"
module "serial_cs" opts "irq_list=3"
dmesg:
Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.0.8
kernel build: 2.2.0-pre8-ac1 #15 Tue Jan 19 21:31:46 CET 1999
options: [pci] [apm]
Intel PCIC probe:
TI 1131 PCI-to-CardBus at bus 0 slot 4, mem 0x68000000, 2 sockets
host opts [0]: [pci + serial irq] [no pci irq] [lat 168/176] [bus
32/34]
host opts [1]: [pci + serial irq] [no pci irq] [lat 168/176] [bus
35/37]
ISA irqs (default) = 3 polling interval = 1000 ms
cs: IO port probe 0x0120-0x012f: clean.
cs: IO port probe 0x02f8-0x02ff: clean.
cs: memory probe 0xa0000000-0xa0ffffff: clean.
eth0: 3Com 3c589, port 0x120, irq 3, Auto port, hw_addr
00:00:86:18:84:94
tty01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
eth0: autodetected 10baseT
# cardctl ident
Socket 0:
product info: "3Com", "Megahertz 3CXEM556", "LAN + 56k Modem", ""
manfid: 0x0101, 0x0035
function: 0 (multifunction)
Socket 1:
no product info available
# cardctl status
Socket 0:
5V 16-bit card present
Function 0: ready
Function 1: ready
Socket 1:
no card
# /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia
PCMCIA=yes
PCIC=i82365
PCIC_OPTS="wakeup=1 irq_list=3"
CORE_OPTS=
Sincerely,
Todd A. Wood
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: ip-up problem
Date: 19 Jan 1999 12:46:03 -0600
Jonas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
..
: in my /etc/ppp/ip-up it says:
: .....
: run-parts /etc/ppp/ip-up.d
: .....
: I've put a file named firewall in the directory containing my firewall rules
: . Made it executable, but when i run pppd and a connection is made it
: doesn't execute the script. Why? Is the name wrong or what?
In order for pppd to execute a command from /etc/ppp/ip-up the command
must have the full path specified.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: Samba and "Sendmail" on a notebook
Date: 19 Jan 1999 19:13:42 GMT
In article <77p1vf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I have my notebook computer configured to browse the internet using a
| network. When I take this computer off the network and to boot it up, it
| takes forever. It always stays on Sendmail for about 10 minutes and Samba
| for about 30 minutes. Is there anyway to shorten the timeout wait?
It's caused by no nameserver. Either run a caching server on the local
machine, with only a few addresses like localhost and the machine's real
name, or modify the resolv.conf file to drop any nameservers not
available. Long waits for DNS to time out, longer if you have multiple
servers.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
"Too soon we grow old, and too late we grow smart" -Arthur Godfrey
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
