Linux-Networking Digest #968, Volume #9 Fri, 22 Jan 99 14:13:48 EST
Contents:
Re: Cannot ping win95 from Linux (Jeffery Cann)
Re: Win95 to Linux via Serial ports/PPP (Rob van der Putten)
Any program conver text file to g3 format file ? ("Wilson Lam")
web ripper (karim)
How do I access mails in Outlook on Linux (Joseph Kuan)
Can anyone help me? (plea for mail). ("minstrel")
Re: FTP problem - RedHat 5.2 (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: "New Mail"-Notification via smbclient (Andrzej Filip)
Re: newbie question (Ulrich Eckhardt)
Re: Mail Spooler.... (Andrzej Filip)
Re: Linux server on small network (Doug DeJulio)
Re: running X on a remote server (Stef)
no ping when adding network machine ("Hans Kool")
Re: AutoPPP and pppd server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: to get SATAN... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
site for microsoft violations ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Almost PPP-connected?? (Viktor Jonsson)
sun <--> linux box ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Do I need Samba ?? (Villy Kruse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jeffery Cann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cannot ping win95 from Linux
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 05:59:46 -0700
Alvin Lim wrote:
> Try reinstalling the TCP/IP stacks on your computers in Windows
> ie, delete the TCP/IP protocol in Control Panel/Networking
> and then reboot
> and then go back into Control Panel/Networking
> and then add the TCP/IP stack again.
My thanks for the advice. Predictably, this didn't work. The TCP/IP stack
was not initializing because the windows 95 device driver showed the network
card as unavailable.
The way I got it to work was:
1. Remove network card on windoze.
2. Shut down windoze.
3. Pull network card out of motherboard.
4. reboot.
5. shutdown
6. add network card to motherboard.
7. reboot.
8. add network protocols.
9. reboot
10. configure network protocols
11. reboot
> Jeffery Cann wrote:
>
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I have a simple 2 node ethernet. There is a Linux-only server
> > (192.168.0.1) and a Linux-WIN95 dual boot client (192.168.0.2). They
> > are connected with 10-Base-T cross-over cable.
> >
> > When the dual boot machine is running Linux, I have no networking
> > problems. I can ping, telnet, ftp, etc between both machines. Because
> > networking works great on Linux, I assume I have no problems with
> > ethernet cards or x-over cable.
> >
> > The problem is (of course) windows 95. I cannot ping, telnet, or ftp
> > the Linux server from MS-DOS window. Ping reports:
> >
> > "PING: transmit failed, error code 10043"
> >
> > Looking on Microsoft's web site, this socket error code means that my
> > TCP/IP stack has not initialized.
> >
> > I have added both IP addresses, fcdn and aliases to the 'hosts' file. I
> > am not using WINS, DNS, or gateway. I have the following settings for
> > windows:
> >
> > IP Address: 192.168.0.2
> > Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
> > Microsoft client for networks
> > Ethernet adapter
> > NetBUI protocol
> > TCP/IP protocol
> >
> > Issuing a netstat -r shows no active routes or no active connections. I
> > tried the following route commands in ms-dos, but still same PING
> > message.
> >
> > route add 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
> >
> > also
> >
> > route add 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
> >
> > Finally, from the Linux server, any ping request to the win95 machine
> > times out.
> >
> > The "Networking Troubleshooter" in win95 is useless. If anyone can
> > suggest some place where I can get information about how to set up the
> > windows portion of this network, I would appreciate it.
> >
> > Jeff
> > --
> > "Who does not trust enough will not be trusted."
> >
> > - Lao Tsu
--
"Who does not trust enough will not be trusted."
- Lao Tsu
------------------------------
From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win95 to Linux via Serial ports/PPP
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:13:15 +0100
Hi there
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Matt Kressel wrote:
> Make sure to NOT use hardware flow control (use software if
> necessary) since you do not have control lines.
With a proper cable you do.
RXD--------\ /--------RXD
X
TXD--------/ \--------TXD
RTS--------\ /--------RTS
X
CTS--------/ \--------CTS
DTR--------\ /--------DTR
X
DSR--*-----/ \-----*--DSR
| |
DCD--+ +--DCD
GND---------------------GND
Not using flow control may result in lost packets.
Regards,
Rob
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: "Wilson Lam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,de.alt.comm.mgetty
Subject: Any program conver text file to g3 format file ?
Date: 22 Jan 1999 13:39:30 GMT
Hi,
I have tried pbmtext comes with mgetty. It seems it not working
correctly. Is there any other program can do the job correctly ?
Any help is appreciated !
Wilson
------------------------------
From: karim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: web ripper
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:01:35 GMT
Is there a good web ripper out there ? I've tried wget, but it doesn't
actually make the list of files nor does it do file filtering, I need
something like WebZip for windoze (if anyone is familiar with that).
Karim Nasser
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Kuan)
Subject: How do I access mails in Outlook on Linux
Date: 22 Jan 1999 15:00:13 GMT
Does anyone know is that possible to access my mail account in MS Outlook
on a WinNT machine from Linux?
Joe
------------------------------
From: "minstrel" <none>
Subject: Can anyone help me? (plea for mail).
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:47:12 GMT
I'm beginning to think I may have to go without mail on my Linux box
indefinitely.
Here's the problem: fetchmail checks my POP3 mail fine when I don't have
any. The problem comes when I do have mail. It can tell how many messages
I have, and it starts reading the first message. Here's the problem:
SMTP connect to localhost failed
fetchmail: SMTP transaction error while fetching from server
Yes, I have sendmail running. I starts a bootup just as it should.
Does anyone have any idea what's wrong, or even how I could begin to find
out what's wrong. It's quite a pain to have to boot Windows every time I
want to check my mail, or visit this wonderful group.
Any help will be seen a God sent.
Thanks,
Aaron Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: FTP problem - RedHat 5.2
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:25:18 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you using root to login. Make up some generic login with 1:6
and ftp into that login.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've managed to setup a FTP daemon on the two Linux boxes I've connected via a
> private network. However I'm having this problem accessing the other Linux box
> via FTP. The problem is as follows:
>
> ftp fairlane
> Connected to fairlane
> 220 fairlane.fords.com.au FTP Server ..............
> Name (fairlane:root): ftp
> 530 User ftp access denied
> Login failed
>
> I only have two Linux machines connected to each other and I can't ftp both
> ways. Using either machine to access the other via ftp gets the above error
> message. I have setup a ftp account. I've also tried root and my personal
> account both getting the above message. I don't have a \etc\ftpusers file so
> I assume that no user accounts are denied at all. Also I've checked
> hosts.allow and that is set as ALL : ALL and nothing is in hosts.deny so
> what could be the problem? It seems strange that it didn't even ask me for
> the password before giving me the error message. I've installed wu-ftppackage
> on both machines as well. I was able to telnet to one other no problems and
> NFS works as well. So can anyone tell me what's going on? Thanks.
>
> Timbo.
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Andrzej Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "New Mail"-Notification via smbclient
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:10:54 +0100
Marcus Faure wrote:
> I am running a linux mailserver that receives mail via UUCP over TCP.
> The mails are sorted into the users' mailfolders in /var/spool/mail via
> procmail and are fetched from windows clients with pop3.
> The problem is that some users never check if new messages arrived, so i
> decided to put winpopup into the startup folder and run smbclient to
> notify them.
> But - you guessed it - I could not figure out how to do it.
> For testing, I just piped the whole message into smbclient via
> /etc/aliases:
>
> joe.user: "|/usr/bin/smbclient -M winhost -d 3 > /tmp/debuglog"
>
> /tmp/debuglog says, that 500 or so bytes are transmitted. Only winpopup
> does not popup. This works perfectly with exactly the same debuglog
> when run from the commandline (no matter under what uid) , e.g.
>
> cat /var/spool/mail/joe.user|/usr/bin/smbclient -M winhost -d 3 > /tmp/debuglog
>
> I also tried to run smbclient from .forward with the same result. When put
> into /etc/aliases, smbclient is executed as user daemon, but this does
> not seem to be the problem because su - daemon, cat cat /var/spool/mail[..]
> works.
try:
|/usr/bin/formail -X from: -X subject: |/usr/bin/smbclient -M winhost -d 3 >
/tmp/debuglog
It should forward only from and subject headers.
--
Andrzej (Andrew) A. Filip
home e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie question
Date: 22 Jan 1999 15:45:48 GMT
Haaino Beljaars wrote:
>
> > >Since yesterday my RH 5.2 machine has a connection to the internet via a
> > >cablemodem. All works fine. But, since I know that the internet isn't
> > >safe these days I want to place some security on my computer before I
> > >let it run 24 hours a day. So, I have installed a simple firewall to
> > >ensure that nobody can get to my netwerk and so. But, I also know that
> > >RH has some security holes on its own. What should I do the make my
> > >machine run more securerely?
>
> > install a shadow password
> > and thing's like that... remove Anonymous FTP....
>
> Done all this. But are other thinks I should worry about? I heard that
> some programs, such as sendmail have reported bug that causes security
> risks. Where can I read more about this kind of topics and how to close
> some holes?
Hi,
there are several security mailing lists around. I thing
redhad has it's own security mailing list. Also a common
mailing list about security issues (not only linux specific)
is bugtraq.
Just search around with your favorite search engine about this
topic and have a look on the redhat web - page
Uli
--
Ulrich Eckhardt Tr@nscom GbR
http://people.frankfurt.netsurf.de/uli http://www.transcom.de
Lagerstra�e 11-15 A8
64807 Dieburg Germany
------------------------------
From: Andrzej Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mail Spooler....
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:15:17 +0100
Brad McMahan wrote:
> I would like to setup a system that would execpt email for a domain if
> the main mail server is down. In the DNS I would have two MX records. My
> question is how do I setup the sendmail on the mail spooler to except mail
> for that domain and then forward it to the real mail server when it's up
> again?
>
> Brad
Just make sure that antispam rules allow relaying email for primary
via secondary.
redhat:
add the domain name to /etc/mail/relay_allow and restart sendmail.
That's all.
For more details:
news:comp.mail.sendmail
http://www.sendmail.org/faq
--
Andrzej (Andrew) A. Filip
home e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug DeJulio)
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Linux server on small network
Date: 21 Jan 1999 13:24:57 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matthew Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Best windows telnet package? Tera-Term is quite nice, as it's pretty
>robust and there's an ssh add-on for it, but I much prefer Ewan as it's
>fast and has a decent xterm-like font.
>
>Alternatively, grab a free X server for Windows and run that. There's one
>called MiX which works OK. I like eXceed, but it's expensive - you'd be
>better off spending the money on another hd and dual-booting :)
An alternative to getting an X server for Windows would be to set up
VNC between the windows and Linux boxes. When you're going over a
small local LAN, its network performance is more than sufficient, and
I find it easier for a non-hardcore-unix-geek to set up than an X
server (eg. all the font issues are pushed off to the Unix server).
--
Doug DeJulio | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HKS, Incorporated | http://www.hks.net/~ddj/
------------------------------
From: Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: running X on a remote server
Date: 22 Jan 1999 18:22:17 +0100
: How can i start X server of a remote machine ??
: Is there any way to do this?
You mean so that the Output of the X Server apears on your local
machine? I don't think this is possible. But Maybe VNC can solve your
problem. I find it very usefull:
http://www.orl.co.uk/vnc
Stef
--
WebMaster D-WERK
UNIX and Windows NT administration, SOS-ETH
ETH Zurich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hoes.li
------------------------------
From: "Hans Kool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: no ping when adding network machine
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:20:59 +0100
I have a problem: when I try to add my Win95 laptop to my Linux/Windows 95
LAN the network freezes!
Let me describe the situation:
'Old situation' - working fine:
===============================
I have a simple network with one Redhat 5.0 Linux server & one Windows 95
machine. The linux machine acts as a fileserver, running Samba, the Windos
59 machine (4.0.0.950B) is my regular 'workstation', with IPX/SPX, Netbeui
and TCP/IP installed. I use 10MB NIC's connected by a simple 5 port hub
(10MB). I can ping from/to both machines and access files, run a linux
webserver (apache, great!) etc. No problem at all, until....
'New situation' - not working :-(
==================================
I want to connect my laptop to the network. I use a 10/100MB Dynalink L100C
PCMCIA card (configured to run at 10MB). The laptop as also a Windows 95
machine (4.0.0.950B), same drivers etc. as the other windows95 machines,
except for the IP address of course. All IP addresses are static in the
192.168.42.xx range, netmask 255.255.255.0.
When the problems start:
========================
Now what's happening? Suppose I am running my network as usual: one Linux
server, one windows 95 machine. All working fine. I start pinging the
windows 95 machine from the Linux machine for a unlimited period to
demonstrate what's happening. Then I boot the Compaq 1220 laptop (connected
to the hub). The pinging between Linux and the workstation continues, but as
soon as the LINK led on the laptop's PCMCIA card flashes on, the pinging
from Linux to the workstation stops. If I try to ping form the workstation
to Linux I receive a 'Request timed out' message.
I now can not ping any machine from Linux, nor the Linux machine from any
windows 95 machine any more. However, I CAN ping between the two Windows 95
machines. If I then physically disconnect the STP cable connecting the
laptop to the hub, the pinging from Linux to the Windows95 workstation
continues as if nothing happened!
I don't know too much about networking, but I tried to examin the network
with Netstat. It does not report any hard errors.
PS: If I use the combination laptop + Linux only (without the 'windows95
workstation'), everything works fine too (so I think the laptop should be
configured properly). Also, the name to IP translation (via hosts file) is
ok.
This is a very nasty situation, since I lose contact with my fileserver as
soon as the laptop joins the network.
Can anybody help me (I hope I gave enough info)?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: AutoPPP and pppd server
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 12:11:04 GMT
Hi!
Earlier I posted a message that I will give it a try so I did.
I was successful on my stand alone server. I tested it with a
windows98 client and it work like I was logging in to my ISP.
I tested both the http and ftp url and the results were quite
amazing. Let me know if you have any progress.
Bud
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alan Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've installed Redhat 5.1 for use as a small dialup PPP server. Dialout
> PPP works fine, but inbound /AutoPPP/ calls will not stay connected. A
> Win95/Win98 caller can connect and log in, but immediately gets the
> dreaded "cannot negotiate a set of protocols" message. An OS/2 dialer
> gets similar results without the message.
>
> On the dialer side, TCP/IP is the only protocol requested. On the Linux
> side, mgetty takes the call and PAP validates the user successfully, but
> then the caller drops the session almost immediately. The Linux box is a
> standalone, not networked to anything else currently.
>
> /var/logs/messages says that CCP was terminated by the remote. Why
> is it giving up?
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: to get SATAN...
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:45:44 GMT
In article <wKqK1FFR#[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Michael Lee Yohe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>you may want to take a look at SATAN: System Administrator Tool for
> >>Analyzing Network
> >
For a better free vulnerability scanning tool I would look at Nessus. It has
almost five times as many vulnerabilities as SAINT and replaces the slow,
kludgy CGI interface with a real one [i.e GTK+]
Nessus is available at http://www.nessus.org
-mdf
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: site for microsoft violations
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:19:45 GMT
Is there a web site for all of the violations of the internet runns that
Microsoft has enaged in. This would seem to be a very useful site. The only
problem is who can enough space to host it ;-)
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Viktor Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Almost PPP-connected??
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 19:17:57 +0100
Hi,
I had the same problem. I installed KDE and used thier kpppd program, which is
a lot easier to use then scripts. Try to change to PAP in you confs.
/Viktor
Den m�n, 11 jan 1999 skrev George Lampke:
>Running Redhat 5.2 and using "ppp-on" and "ppp-on-dialer" to make PPP
>connection to my ISP. THe modem dials, connects, and receives my login
>and password. It establishes a connection but shuts down almost
>immediately. The last lines in /var/log/messages are:
>
>Jan 11 14:31:52 localhost pppd[835]: Serial connection established.
>Jan 11 14:31:53 localhost pppd[835]: Using interface ppp0
>Jan 11 14:31:53 localhost pppd[835]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua2
>Jan 11 14:31:56 localhost pppd[835]: Serial line is looped back.
>Jan 11 14:31:56 localhost pppd[835]: Connection terminated.
>Jan 11 14:31:57 localhost pppd[835]: Exit.
>Jan 11 14:33:29 localhost kernel: PPP: ppp line discipline successfully
>unregistered
>
>
>WHAT HAPPENED!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sun <--> linux box
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 12:11:07 GMT
This is a question about connecting a Sun Ultra (running Solaris 2.5.1) and an
Alpha box (Running Linux - Redhat 5.2), which is about to be purchased. The
Alpha box will have a 7200 RPM IBM Ultra 2 drive with an Ultra 2 SCSI
controller.
I'm at a University, and here we just plug a jack into the wall for each
machine we want to be on the ethernet. (As you can see, I don't know much
about these things.) So the Sun and the Alpha (which will be physically right
next to each other) are (will be) both plugged into the wall and communicate
through the ethernet, which is shared with a bunch of other machines.
I want the Sun to be able to carry out calculations on the files which reside
on the Alpha. So I mount the Alpha drive onto the Sun, and thus via NFS let
the Sun pretend that the Alpha drive is really inside the Sun. But the files
are megabyte size, and there are many files, so during a day, there might be
around 10 gigabytes getting passed through the ethernet from the Alpha to the
Sun (and a modest amount back the other way).
I'm concerned that this method of getting files from the Alpha to the Sun is
inefficient. Speed is a big issue.
Do I have other options? Will setting up a separate hub let the Alpha and
Sun communicate faster? If so, what hardware/software do I need and how
do I do it?
Thanks,
David Jaffe
Dept. of Math. and Stat.
Univ. of Nebraska - Lincoln
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Subject: Re: Do I need Samba ??
Date: 22 Jan 1999 19:27:14 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tom Reinertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark,
>
>> RTFM for SAMBA.
>
>What manual? The only thing I can find on SAMBA is the SMB HOWTO which is
>pretty spotty. Is there something more complete?
>
For example one of these: Someone also wrote a book on SAMBA. I'm not sure
which publisher, though.
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/COPYING
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/announce
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Application_Serving.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/BROWSING.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/BUGS.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/cifsntdomain.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/CVS_ACCESS.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/DHCP-Server-Configuration.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/DIAGNOSIS.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/DNIX.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/DOMAIN.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/DOMAIN_CONTROL.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/ENCRYPTION.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-meta-FAQ-1.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-meta-FAQ-2.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-meta-FAQ-3.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-meta-FAQ-4.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-meta-FAQ-5.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-meta-FAQ-6.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-meta-FAQ.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-meta-FAQ.sgml
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-meta-FAQ.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-Server-FAQ-1.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-Server-FAQ-2.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-Server-FAQ.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/Samba-Server-FAQ.sgml
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/sambafaq-1.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/sambafaq-2.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/sambafaq-3.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/sambafaq-4.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/sambafaq-5.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/sambafaq.html
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/sambafaq.sgml
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/faq/sambafaq.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Faxing.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/GOTCHAS.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/HINTS.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/history
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/INSTALL.sambatar
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/make_smbcodepage.1
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/MIRRORS.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/NetBIOS.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/nmbd.8
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/NT4_PlainPassword.reg
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/NTDOMAIN.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/OS2-Client-HOWTO.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Passwords.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/PRINTER_DRIVER.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Printing.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/PROFILES.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/PROJECTS
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/README.DCEDFS
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/README.jis
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/README.sambatar
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/samba.7
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/samba.lsm
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/SCO.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/security_level.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smb.conf.5
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smbclient.1
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smbd.8
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smbmnt.8
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smbmount.8
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smbpasswd.8
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smbrun.1
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smbstatus.1
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smbtar.1
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/SMBTAR.notes
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/smbumount.8
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Speed.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Speed2.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Support.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/testparm.1
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/testprns.1
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/THANKS
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Tracing.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/UNIX-SMB.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/UNIX_INSTALL.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/wfw_slip.htm
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Win95.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/Win95_PlainPassword.reg
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/docs/WinNT.txt
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/dce-dfs
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/dce-dfs/README
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/dce-dfs/smb.conf
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/misc
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/misc/extra_smbstatus
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/misc/wall.perl
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printer-accounting
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printer-accounting/acct-all
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printer-accounting/acct-sum
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printer-accounting/hp5-redir
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printer-accounting/lp-acct
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printer-accounting/printcap
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printer-accounting/README
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printing
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printing/smbprint
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/printing/smbprint.sysv
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/README
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/simple
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/simple/README
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/simple/smb.conf
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/smb.conf.default
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/svr4-startup
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/svr4-startup/README
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/svr4-startup/samba.server
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/thoralf
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/thoralf/smb.conf
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/tridge
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/tridge/README
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/tridge/smb.conf
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/tridge/smb.conf.fjall
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/tridge/smb.conf.lapland
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/tridge/smb.conf.vittjokk
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/tridge/smb.conf.WinNT
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/validchars
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/validchars/msdos70.out
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/validchars/nwdos70.out
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/validchars/readme
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/validchars/validchr.c
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/examples/validchars/validchr.com
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/Manifest
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/Read-Manifest-Now
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/README
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/Roadmap
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p7/WHATSNEW.txt
>
>> SAMBA is an SMB (server message block) server for Linux and is onlynecessary
>> if you want to use your Linux box to participate in Microsoft Networking. If
>> all you want is TCP/IP functionality, you do NOT need SAMBA.
>
>>
>
>If I want my Win95 PC to be able to access a printer on a Linux box, do I still
>need SAMBA?
>
That would be much easier with SAMBA. The you can use the standard Win95
network printer facility.
>Thanks
>
>Tom
>
>
Villy
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
