Linux-Networking Digest #984, Volume #9 Sun, 24 Jan 99 09:14:14 EST
Contents:
Re: HELP: IBM ISA Token Ring 16/4 (mark ross)
Re: DNS problem with IP Masq Gateway (David Kirkpatrick)
how to setup a driver for sis6326 display card in RH5.2 Linux? ("Alexander")
how to setup a driver for sis6326 display card in RH5.2 Linux? ("Alexander")
Re: PORT 110 Connection refused !! (Matthew Malthouse)
Re: Mount WIN9x drive across LAN (Richard Hector)
Testing PPP ("Mark Lopez")
Proxy problem ("Ahmed Hasan")
Re: connect refused (Thomas Beutin)
Setup modem on Sony Vaio 505 notebook (Felix Lam)
Setup modem on Sony Vaio 505 notebook (Felix Lam)
Re: Configuring system to have multiple ethernet addresses (Chris Brenton)
Dual Token Ring Cards on RedHat 5.2 ("Rett Walters")
Re: Which processes listen on which ports ? ("Rett Walters")
Re: Need SMBMOUNT! (root)
Re: Configuring system to have multiple ethernet addresses (Brian McCauley)
Simple? Sendmail newbie question (Scott R. Palmer)
Token Ring network? (Stef)
Re: Firewall or IPMasq or Both: Need Recommendation (Dan Kegel)
Re: Which processes listen on which ports ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Basic Home Network Guidance - Please (David Francis)
Repost: ppp dialin causes diald to bring up ppp dialout link (Colum Paget)
Re: Cable Modem problems (Blake Winton)
Probleme mit Netwerk ("Gerald Werner")
Re: I need a good proxy server (Dan Kegel)
Firewalling (Donovan Wade)
Re: Can anyone help me? (plea for mail). ("minstrel")
Routing problems ... (Daniel Tyrode)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mark ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: HELP: IBM ISA Token Ring 16/4
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:29:24 -0800
Thanks for the info Richard & Michael
Richard Payne wrote:
>
> >Does the token ring driver seem stable ?
> >I was thinking of building linux box to route between a token ring and
> >ethernet networks.
> >Any one have any experence on this ?
>
> Seems fine to me. I've got a 486 with an Auto16/4 in it and it has
> run for months w/o any trouble.
>
> --
> Rich Payne
> (Speaking for myself, not my employer)
> payner at timken dot com
>
> Looking for Alpha-Linux info?
> http://www.alphalinux.org
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS problem with IP Masq Gateway
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:50:06 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How are you connected to the net? Is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx the
nameserver provided by your ISP? Are you only local or
even going to an ISP? What is in hosts, lmhosts and networks?
Matthew Ho wrote:
>
> My linux gateway with IP masquerade enable has a problem with its DNS
> lookup. I have a LAN with 4 Windoze host machines connected to a linux
> gateway with IP masquerade configured. The hosts work fine with some
> applications like Web and ICQ. However, my linux gateway cannot resolve
> internet domain name. I can resolve names within the LAN thru. the
> hosts file. Everytime i try "ping www.yahoo.com" there is no reply.
> when i try "nslookup", i got the following
>
> *** Can't find server name for address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: No response from
> server.
>
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the DNS i use for every host machines.
>
> my resolv.conf has the entry
>
> nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>
> and nsswitch.conf
>
> hosts: files dns
>
> looks like resolver cannot talk to the dns i specified.
> Please help.
>
> Thanks
> Matthew
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: hk.comp.os.linux,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: how to setup a driver for sis6326 display card in RH5.2 Linux?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 01:09:05 +0800
i was already setup a Redhat 5.2 linux but it can't recognize my display
card
SIS6326 AGP 8mb RAM.
When i start "startx", the screen is very large, all icon is enlarge.
So, how can i update my display card driver.
Pls give me some advice, thx
I'm so poor, pls tell me step by step, thx
------------------------------
From: "Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
hk.comp.os.linux,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.rpm,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: how to setup a driver for sis6326 display card in RH5.2 Linux?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 01:07:58 +0800
i was already setup a Redhat 5.2 linux but it can't recognize my display
card
SIS6326 AGP 8mb RAM.
When i start "startx", the screen is very large, all icon is enlarge.
So, how can i update my display card driver.
Pls give me some advice, thx
I'm so poor, pls tell me step by step, thx
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Malthouse)
Subject: Re: PORT 110 Connection refused !!
Date: 22 Jan 1999 21:38:07 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:04:27 GMT shin, dong shik wrote:
} Hi,
}
} When I telnet to localhost at 110 pop3 port, my linux box return this:
}
} trying 127.0.0.1
} telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
}
} I dont know why and how to fix it. Really I have no ideas where to
} check from the first..!!
} please help me...
}
} ---
} /etc/hosts.deny:
} ALL: ALL
}
} /etc/hosts.allow:
} ALL: LOCAL @my.domain.name
}
} /etc/inetd:
} pop2 ... ... ... /usr/sbin/tcpd ipop2d
} pop3 ... ... ... /usr/sbin/tcpd ipop3d
} imap ... ... ... /usr/sbin/tcpd imapd
}
} I think those setting will be ok, but...
Can you connect with a POP3 client application? if _not_ do you
have a line
pop3 110/tcp # POP version 3
in /etc/services
Matthew
--
"Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern
technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat."
http://www.calmeilles.demon.co.uk
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:33:47 +1300
From: Richard Hector <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mount WIN9x drive across LAN
Dave Roznar wrote:
>
> I have a home LAN with 3 Win9X systems. All is OK and all ping and can
> access the Cable Modem.
>
> One of these systems also has RedHat 5_2 installed with KDEand
> Netscape 4.5 for Linux. It works fine across the LAN/Gateway/cable
> modem (which is on a Win98 system). It, too, pings the Win9X systems.
>
> However...I would like to MOUNT my other systems drives. I can mount
> the win9X partition on my Linux box in the standard way...mount -t
> vfat /dev/hda1 /mnt/win and I don't have a problem with mounting the
> FAT32 partition.
>
> My question is...can I mount the remote drives of the systems on my
> LAN without running NFS/Samba, etc. Can I just use the Win peer to
> peer setup ? (I didn't think so) :-)
I think Samba is only the 'server' side. You need smbfs in your kernel
(as a module?).
I don't think you need Samba as well for that, but you may want it
anyway, for the Win machines to see your Linux (and non-running Windows)
disk(s).
I think I only ever got Samba going, not smbfs (It was all too
frustrating with a 386sx20 Linux box :-)
Richard Hector
------------------------------
From: "Mark Lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Testing PPP
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:45:56 -0800
Are there any tools(sniffers,analyzers) , running on Linux, that can monitor
PPP negotiatons. tcpdump only monitors after a connection is established. I
need to see the connection coming up etc..
Any help would be appreciated!
Mark
------------------------------
From: "Ahmed Hasan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Proxy problem
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 15:55:29 +0300
My ISP connects me to the Internet using a proxy server. It is very easy to
setup the connection in Windows, but I am trying to connect to the Internet
through Linux and want to use a tool like lynx, gopher and the other tools.
Can you tell please how to tell Linux to connect using the proxy server?
------------------------------
From: Thomas Beutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: connect refused
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 14:20:01 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hallo,
>
> ich habe ein Problem mit dem Netzwerk zwischen Unix V (Interactive),
> Linux S.u.S.E 6.0 und WindowsNT+95 Rechnern.
> Das Netzwerk zwischen den Rechner funktioniert soweit ganz
> gut, ich kann unter einander ein ping absetzen (jeder Rechner hat eine
> eigene TCP/IP-Adresse) aber ich komme von den Unix- Rechner nicht
> mit telnet oder ftp auf die Windows Rechner.
Do You have a telnet/ftp server on your Wondoze boxes? It's not in
standard
Windoze - may be a ftp server in NT.
What's about a telnet/ftp between Linux and Interactive?
>
> Kann mir einer helfen
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Thomas Beutin
Fon +49-30-444 29 31 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax +49-30-446 41 52 http://laokoon.in-berlin.de/~beutin/
Beam me up, Scotty. There is no intelligent live down in Redmond.
------------------------------
From: Felix Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Setup modem on Sony Vaio 505 notebook
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 01:17:06 +1100
hi there,
I have been trying to setup the 56K internal modem with
redhat 5.1 and tried to make call using minicom.
ATDTxxxxxxxx
NO DIAL TONE
I have fiddled with the init string (ATZ, AT&FX3 ...etc)
but still no luck. I checked the IRQ and stuff with setserial
and appear fine (com2, i.e. on /dev/cua1).
This modem works fine on my win98 setup.
Thanks a lot in advance. This has been bugging me for
nights now ... :(
------------------------------
From: Felix Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Setup modem on Sony Vaio 505 notebook
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 01:20:14 +1100
hi there,
I have been trying to setup the 56K internal modem with
redhat 5.1 and tried to make call using minicom.
ATDTxxxxxxxx
NO DIAL TONE
I have fiddled with the init string (ATZ, AT&FX3 ...etc)
but still no luck. I checked the IRQ and stuff with setserial
and appear fine (com2, i.e. on /dev/cua1).
This modem works fine on my win98 setup.
Thanks a lot in advance. This has been bugging me for
nights now ... :(
------------------------------
From: Chris Brenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.networks,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.nt.kernel-mode,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Configuring system to have multiple ethernet addresses
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:26:39 -0500
Amey Laud wrote:
>
> using separate networks to handle the input and the output, that is,
> each system reads from a different physical network
> and writes into a different physical network. This would mean that each
> machine have two IP addresses
> that are configured on separate ethernet cards and can be addressed and
> used explicitly.
> 1. Is such an arrangement possible? (That is, OS and IP support)
Depends. A quick question, will systems be reading & writing to the same
machine? Something like the following:
HOST_1
| |
HOST_2
The reason I ask is that you will go through hell trying to select which
network will be used. It would be far easier to use a single subnet but
implement it on a full duplex switch. If however you are talking
something more like this:
HOST_1
|
HOST_2
|
HOST_3
Where HOST_2 will be communicating on 2 subnets, this type of setup will
not be a problem and should work fine.
> 2. Are there existing examples of such a setup?
Multi-homed hosts are pretty common. IT all depends on how you are
trying to lay it all out.
> 3. The arrangement might involve heterogenous platforms.
> I am interested specifically on the possibility of such a setup on
> NT/Linux running on Intel (Xeon)/Alpha.
Should not be any more of a problem. The issues I mention above stem
from general networking principals and are not limited to a specific OS.
The only real difference is that if you are attempting the first network
config (2 networks in parallel), each OS may use a different process in
choosing which network to use for communications.
Cheers,
Chris
--
**************************************
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Multiprotocol Network Design & Troubleshooting
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0782120822/geekspeaknet
* Mastering Network Security
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0782123430/geekspeaknet
------------------------------
From: "Rett Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dual Token Ring Cards on RedHat 5.2
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:44:45 -0600
Hello All:
I am currently attempting to get 2 IBM 16/4 Auto ISA token ring adapters
installed in an IBM PC 360 (i686/150). I have been able to get Linux to
detect and install the first card. However, only after I turned of PnP for
the card and hardcoded the resources. I did the same with the second
adapter. I set aliases for tr1 and tr0 in conf.modules, with one at io=a20
(this one works) and the other at a24 (this one doesn't work). During
bootup I get good initialization of the first card, but the Kernel says
"Delaying Intialization of tr1". I have verified the resources of both
cards to be unique... I still can't seem to get it going.
Does anybody out there have any ideas???
Please Help!
Rett Walters
Please respond via email as well...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Rett Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Which processes listen on which ports ?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:48:08 -0600
Add a 'n' to the command:
For example:
netstat -aoen --inet
Rett Walters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>:> Thanks, Joerg.
>
>: the command is :
>
>: netstat -aoe --inet
>
>Actually, I just did that and it looks like it only replaces the port
>numbers with the associated protocals from the /etc/services. It doesn't
>really say which process is binding the port. For instance I ran sshd on
>port 79 and that command reported it as finger :)
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Need SMBMOUNT!
Date: 22 Jan 1999 15:05:04 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Roznar) writes:
>
> >. So, where is smbmount!! I
> >> did not compile Samba, but used the RedHat RPMS for Appolo from the
> >> Samba site.
> >>
> >
> > They didn't compile it with the option --with-smbmount.
> >
>
> Well, I solved my own problem. I looked at my CD and started looking
> at the Packages available. I found smbfs under the FILE package.
> smbmount/smbumont were there.....all 50K. So I added them and they
> worked.
>
Bear in mind, that the smbfs rpm works ONLY with 2.0.x kernels.
Either with 2.1.xxx or 2.2.0 kernels it won't work. You need the smbmount
version that comes with samba (the rpm you installed has nothing to do with
the samba package) and infact it needs to be compiled against the respective
kernel headers.
Unfortunately, as you mentioned the smbmount program is not included
with the samba2.0 rpm from the contrib site - one has to compile it for him
self.
==============================
p94003@rainbow.**NOSPAM**.cs.unipi.gr
remove **NOSPAM** to reply !!
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.networks,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.nt.kernel-mode,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Configuring system to have multiple ethernet addresses
Date: 23 Jan 1999 15:44:53 +0000
Chris Brenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Amey Laud wrote:
> >
> > using separate networks to handle the input and the output, that is,
> > each system reads from a different physical network
> > and writes into a different physical network.
Yes I think I understand so far.
> > This would mean that each
> > machine have two IP addresses
> > that are configured on separate ethernet cards and can be addressed and
> > used explicitly.
No, I don't see why that follows.
> > 1. Is such an arrangement possible? (That is, OS and IP support)
>
> Depends. A quick question, will systems be reading & writing to the same
> machine? Something like the following:
>
> HOST_1
> | |
> HOST_2
>
> The reason I ask is that you will go through hell trying to select which
> network will be used.
I don't know about NT but Linux has no problem at all having two (or
more) ethernet cards with the _same_ IP address. You can specifiy in
the routing table which is to be used for output. You _can_ still
give the two cards different IP addresses but it gets a bit more messy.
> It would be far easier to use a single subnet but
> implement it on a full duplex switch.
Yes, if you have the requisite hardware this is probably a better
sollution.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
Subject: Simple? Sendmail newbie question
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott R. Palmer)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 10:06:54 -0600
OK, my Linux server is up & running RedHat 5.1, with kernel version 2.0.35.
Now I want to get sendmail setup. I would like to fix an immediate problem
that I have first, and learn about the inner workings of sendmail later, if
possible, so here's my question:
I want to set up my server so that an outside user can use it as an SMTP
server. It works fine as a POP server, but when I try to send mail through it
from another computer using it as the SMTP server, it says that it doesn't like
my destination address, and it only seems to take destinations that are on that
server itself, ie. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ideas? I am trying to get this piece working first, then I'll end up buying a
good book on sendmail later and end up tweaking it more extensively....
TIA,
Scott
------------------------------
From: Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Token Ring network?
Date: 23 Jan 1999 17:26:08 +0100
I want to connect two computers using Token Ring adapters. Can I
directly connect these two Token Ring adapters? I want to make the
cable myself. Which line of one adapter has to be connected with which
line of the other adapter. With lines I mean the holes on the 9-pin
sub-D connector of my adapters. They are numbered like this:
\-------------/
\ 5 4 3 2 1 /
\ 9 8 7 6 /
\-------/
I checked the Token Ring mini HOWTO, but didn't find this information.
Any hint welcome!
Stef
--
WebMaster D-WERK
UNIX and Windows NT administration, SOS-ETH
ETH Zurich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hoes.li
------------------------------
From: Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall or IPMasq or Both: Need Recommendation
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:05:42 -0800
Mike schrieb:
> I also am hosting www and mail via two servers. Must they be outside the
> firewall??? You are correct in assuming they get dynamic IP assigned by my
> term server. I also understand that moving my ISP does not affect internal
> hosts/clients...
>
> What are my options for the www and mail and dns client???
Put the servers *outside* the Masq host.
Put your customers *inside* the Masq host.
Be sure to use the latest Masq, else your customers won't be
able to play some online games. The Masq in kernel 2.2.0-final is fine.
Even with the lastest Masq, some games and programs like ICQ will
give your customers fits.
- Dan
--
Speaking only for myself, not for my employer
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Which processes listen on which ports ?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 18:43:57 GMT
: For example:
: netstat -aoen --inet
Yes, but neither of those actually tell you what processes are bound to
those ports. They merely tell you what the ports are, or the most common
service that uses that port are. Say for example I see that port 5678 is
bound sitting there waiting for connections, how can I find out which
process or which pid is then one that is actually using it?
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Basic Home Network Guidance - Please
From: david@no-spam,dcf.net (David Francis)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:52:27 GMT
Hello:
I have just torn down a dedicated PPP internet connection with a block of
assigned IP addresses and moved the server to my office. Now, back at the
homefront, I have set up a brand-new RedHat 5.2 LINUX system...
My only Internet access now is a dynamicaly assigned IP address through a
dial-up connection. I want to set-up my LINUX box to dial-out on demand from my
Win9* boxes on the home LAN.
LINUX Box= 192.168.0.1
Win9* Box= 192.168.0.2
I don't need to be "spoon fed" the steps. I'd just like to get others input on
how they handle this routing scenario, security considerations, various
options, etc...
Any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
David
------------------------------
From: Colum Paget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Repost: ppp dialin causes diald to bring up ppp dialout link
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:42:25 +0000
I'm reposting the following as I think it got buried in this very active
newsgroup!
Hello All!
I'm dealing with a small office server running redhat where diald
provides a connection to the internet using pppd. Recently I added a
dial in PPP connection, and now when I telnet to the server with my
dialin connection it comes up with the 'Connected To..' message straight
away, (so I presume that my machine connects to the server directly) but
there
is a delay before I get the 'Login' and 'Password' prompts, I'm pretty
sure that it's during this delay that diald brings up the link to the
internet. Presumably the server gets a connection from my client machine
OK, but then can't figure out how to route packets back to it. So I
added to my ip-up script;
'route -host <hostip> dev <ppp-device>'
where <hostip> and <ppp-device> are arguments passed to the script that
tell it the ip address of the client and which net interface it is on (I
detect which tty device as well, so that I only do this for the dial-in
link). I was totally confident that this was the solution to the
problem, supplying an explicit route back to the client, so that packets
wouldn't get sent to the default route of the diald 'fake' slip device,
and cause the internet link to come up. IT MADE NO DIFFERENCE
WHATSOEVER! Help! I'm sure that should have worked and have no idea what
to do now!
On another note, I want to be able to offer certain admin tasks (of
which ppp-on and ppp-off are examples) as options on the embryonic
company intranet through the use of cgi-scripts to kick off the
appropriate commands. However, a lot of these commands seem to require
the user to be root. I don't want to run the webserver as root, because
that seems to much like asking for it, but I can't find any way to
execute these commands otherwise (the setuid permission to make the
effective user root when a script is run doesn't seem to help any). As
a last resort I'm going to try piping the password into the su program
in one of the scripts (what a pity that I can't just pass it on the
command line, let me guess, that would be a security hole wouldn't it?)
but if anyone has a more elegant solution I'd like to hear it!
Thanks a lot
Colum
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blake Winton)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: Cable Modem problems
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:48:59 GMT
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999 23:13:37 GMT, Robert Montgomery wrote:
>I was noticing a message on the Console after every "activate" that said
>something like "delaying activation of eth0", but now even that has
>stopped...
I got that error quite frequently while I was setting up my Linux box
with a few different cards. Using RH5.2, I found that I had to add
alias eth0 ne
options ne io=0x240
(or something similar) to my /etc/conf.modules file. My main problem
was that the auto-detection of the io address seemed to be failing,
which would prevent the ethernet card from being set up.
>Paul Tiseo wrote:
>> 3. I looked into the DHCP HOWTO as it seems to be rather
>> important for cable modems. (Got that out of the cable modem
>> mini-HOWTO) The first thing one must do replace rc.inet1 in
>> /etc/rc.d with a new script. Problem? I don't seem to have an
>> rc.inet1 to replace! Does it have to do with an incomplete
>> networking installation?
Try /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/* instead.
The modifications you need to make are pretty small, IIRC.
Of course, I can't get my linux box totally working either, so who am
I to talk.
Later,
Blake.
------------------------------
From: "Gerald Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Probleme mit Netwerk
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 17:37:37 +0100
Hallo Leute,
ich habe Linux SuSE 6.0 installiert.
Das System laeuft auch.
Nun versuche ich, eine Netzwerkverbindung zu erreichen.
Ich bringe einfach keinen Ping auf einen anderen Rechner zustande.
Verwendet wurde, nach mehreren Versuchen, die absolute Standardvorgabe von
SuSE.
Alle Vorgaben ersetzt, SuSE System fuer Netzwerkserver geladen.
Doch erst einmal die technischen Daten:
(Hardware ist i.O. wurde unter NT und '95 getestet)
AMD 233, IDE, 3c905
Die Details:
Typ des Netzwerks eth0
Art der Karte 3Com 3c590x/3c90x
Optionen options=0 (10Mbit sollten reichen)
Der (die) Rechner wurde installiert (autosensing erkennt die
Netzwerkkarte(n)).
Alle Vorgaben wurden beibehalten.
IP: 192.168.0.99
Subnet: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: eigene IP-Adresse
Ping auf eigenen Rechner o.k.
Ping auf bestehendes Netz versucht, kein Erfolg.
zweiten Rechner plattgemacht:
IP 192.168.0.100
Subnet 255.255.255.0
Gateway eigene IP-Adresse (als auch die vom anderen Rechner probiert)
Eigenen Hub fuer die beiden Linux Rechner eingesetzt.
Ping auf den eigenen Rechner funzt mit IP-Adresse als auch mit
local-Adresse.
Der Ping auf den anderen Rechner bingt kein Ergebnis.
Habt Ihr Ideen was das sein kann?
Oder habe ich da etwas Grundsaetzliches uebersehen.
In den Manuals, gedruckt und online, finde ich keinen Hinweis.
Besten Dank im Voraus
Gerald Werner
------------------------------
From: Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I need a good proxy server
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:08:25 -0800
Peter Hernberg schrieb:
> Well, I (finally) got my ethernet cards working (both of them). Now I
> need a proxy server for my home network. If one of you gurus could
> reccomend one, I would appreciate it. I need one with the following
> features http (duh!), pop, and tcp and udp bridge proxying. Easy setup
> would be a plus. Thanks in advance!
Use Masq. I'd recommend the lastest version, as it's more
compatible with multiplayer games than older ones,
thanks to the loose udp patch.
- Dan
--
Speaking only for myself, not for my employer
------------------------------
From: Donovan Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Firewalling
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 17:23:58 GMT
I am a newbie trying to setup a server with Linux RH5.2, Apache_1.3.3,
PHP, PHPLIB, mod_ssl, etc.
I want to protect myself while I'm still developing, and then also when
it is seriously connected
to the net. I am locally administering it, but that will change to also
include remote administration.
I've read many of the docs for both ipfwadm and also SOCKS5. I'm
leaning towards ipfwadm,
but just don't have any experience in this area.
Any ideas? Thanks very much for any feedback.
Donovan Wade
------------------------------
From: "minstrel" <none>
Subject: Re: Can anyone help me? (plea for mail).
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:35:05 GMT
Thank you ever so much! That was the problem. I had renamed my computer,
changing localhost and localhost.localdomain to my own personal choice.
I have mail!
Aaron Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Daniel Tyrode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Routing problems ...
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:57:23 -0400
Dear linux`s users,
I have been trying to route a class C subnet that has the following
caracteristics:
machine1:
IP: 150.185.162.129
NETMASK: 255.255.255.192
IP network: 150.185.162.128
Broadcast: 150.185.162.191
( this machine has only one ethernet card )
machine2:
IP: 150.185.162.193
Netmask: 255.255.255.192
Broadcast: 150.185.162.255
IP network: 150.185.162.192
( just 1 ethernet card )
machine3: ( router and gateway to the outside )
IP: 150.185.162.29
Netsmask: 255.255.255.128
IP network: 150.185.162.0
Broadcast: 150.185.162.127
This last machine has three ethernet cards, one that goes to machine1
another that goes to machine2 and a third one that goes to the principal
gateway ( in this case a computer with an IP 150.185.162.1 ) that exits
to the Internet.
For some reason, machine1 and machine2 can get conected with each other
through machine 3, and they can also get conected with machine3.
Unfortunatelly I have been unable to establish conection from any
machine1 or machine2 to the principal gateway (150.185.162.1) thus the
outside, although machine3 has normal access to the outside.
Can anyone explain me what is it that I have been doing wrong?
Thank you for your time and help,
Daniel Tyrode
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
